
It highlighted the parallels between other ancient histories and the Enoch account. Namely, the Watchers/Observers (Aliens?), "Spaceships", "Abductions", Atlantis, the introduction of technologies and the alleged suppression of these accounts by the monotheistic faith traditions. Covered the "giants/hybrids" as well.Too much of a clickbait title for me and I hate those long winded go nowhere documentaries that usually lack anything concrete but I am familiar with the book of Enoch to some degree.
This channel is better.. Some good stories here..
Not trying to spite you in any way but that's pre history 101 stuff if you've already read the actual book. Alleged suppression. Those books and many more have been available to anyone who can read for a long time and are widely accepted by just about every sect of christianity.It highlighted the parallels between other ancient histories and the Enoch account. Namely, the Watchers/Observers (Aliens?), "Spaceships", "Abductions", Atlantis, the introduction of technologies and the alleged suppression of these accounts by the monotheistic faith traditions.
I am interested in "pre history" but I'm not really that familiar with it. I have read Enoch and actually much of the Bible. I am drawn in particular to stories that are cross referenced in different cultures, like the flood for example. To me that yields more weight as to their existence. There is also a lot of overlap of "aliens" and giants. It's just interesting, I don't eat it up, and don't worry, I'm still a skeptic. As I mentioned, it has always been curious to me why Enoch was not canonized. I don't know if it was suppressed, but it's a possibility. We've talked a little about why I don't think the Christian account is true, but can discuss more.Not trying to spite you in any way but that's pre history 101 stuff if you've already read the actual book. Alleged suppression. Those books and many more have been available to anyone who can read for a long time and are widely accepted by just about every sect of christianity.
I just find it interesting that it doesn't really change your mind about any other bible stuff where you remain a skeptic but yet are eager to eat this stuff up. I know that probably sounds like an attack on you but it isn't. I just don't get the disconnect there.
I’ve always been fascinated by the Book of Enoch and its take on hidden world history. Once, I had to write an essay about it but struggled with structuring my thoughts. I found a site with professional essay writers who really helped. They made my paper so compelling! Their insight was invaluable, especially when discussing the Watchers and their influence. This made me wonder how much of our known history is influenced by these hidden narratives. Have any of you found other texts that complement Enoch’s writings?Not trying to spite you in any way but that's pre history 101 stuff if you've already read the actual book. Alleged suppression. Those books and many more have been available to anyone who can read for a long time and are widely accepted by just about every sect of christianity.
I just find it interesting that it doesn't really change your mind about any other bible stuff where you remain a skeptic but yet are eager to eat this stuff up. I know that probably sounds like an attack on you but it isn't. I just don't get the disconnect there.
Sure, personal preference, biases and inclinations. But corroboratory evidence can be helpful as well. That’s what Christians often point you to establish the authenticity of a text. Personally I just think Enoch is a cool book. It’s interesting to consider some of its revelations and accounts, but I take it with a grain of salt.I'm curious how some find certain texts compelling while remaining skeptical of others. Maybe it's about how these texts resonate with personal beliefs or gaps in understanding. I think it's also about exploring different perspectives, even if we don’t fully accept them.
Lot called, he wants his wife back.I take it with a grain of salt.