MARK1970 Active member Jan 3, 2009 #1 John, what is the difference between whomp and whomp II ? I am just curious. I currently love the whomp on there now.
John, what is the difference between whomp and whomp II ? I am just curious. I currently love the whomp on there now.
S Suhr Member Jan 5, 2009 #2 MARK1970":tszdy2ba said: John, what is the difference between whomp and whomp II ? I am just curious. I currently love the whomp on there now. Click to expand... It is tighter and never gets muddy, it also retains the normal settings of the presence so you dont feel the need to kick the presence up when using it. They both work great especially compared to typical depth controls but the II is more focused.
MARK1970":tszdy2ba said: John, what is the difference between whomp and whomp II ? I am just curious. I currently love the whomp on there now. Click to expand... It is tighter and never gets muddy, it also retains the normal settings of the presence so you dont feel the need to kick the presence up when using it. They both work great especially compared to typical depth controls but the II is more focused.
F fearhk213 Well-known member Jan 6, 2009 #3 That sounds awesome. I liked the original Whomp, but I always felt it could have used some more focus in the low end. I bet that thing kills now.
That sounds awesome. I liked the original Whomp, but I always felt it could have used some more focus in the low end. I bet that thing kills now.
MARK1970 Active member Jan 6, 2009 #4 John, is it difficult to upgrade to a whomp II ? Can this be done by me or a tech ?
P petethorn New member Jan 10, 2009 #5 Mark I think your avatar could be considered a "Whomp II" I tried the Whomp II yesterday, it sounds really great- tight fat lows
Mark I think your avatar could be considered a "Whomp II" I tried the Whomp II yesterday, it sounds really great- tight fat lows
MARK1970 Active member Jan 10, 2009 #6 petethorn":1cx7yqyr said: Mark I think your avatar could be considered a "Whomp II" I tried the Whomp II yesterday, it sounds really great- tight fat lows Click to expand... Pete, I think you are right. I must find a "Whomp III".
petethorn":1cx7yqyr said: Mark I think your avatar could be considered a "Whomp II" I tried the Whomp II yesterday, it sounds really great- tight fat lows Click to expand... Pete, I think you are right. I must find a "Whomp III".
