V
visualrocker69
New member
This is a kind of desperate situation... since selling my Bogner XTC nearly a year ago (just gasped, myself) I haven't replaced it with any credible means of amplification. I got a V-amp last summer but haven't had much time / inclination to play guitar anyway so I just left everything guitar-related at home during this semester. But, my new guitar is on its way, and I'm looking to get re-inspired and back into the game, so to speak. For that to happen, I need to acquire a piece of gear that'll make the magic happen... Amps aren't something I'm willing to consider, so what'll it be? Axe-FX or Eleven rack?
Has anyone seen a comparative review of these two units? Hopefully one that attempts to be as objective, balanced, and unbiased as possible? (After all, eeeeeeeeeeverybody knows the unequivocal answer is "Axe-FX is always better"
)
The things the Eleven rack has going for it over the Axe-FX are an XLR mic input w/ phantom power, USB connectivity, and a rather big price reduction. First two are fairly indisputable, however, the price drop begs the question ...
Exactly WHAT does the Eleven compromise over the Axe-FX?
Sure there are countless benefits to the Axe-FX based on the fact that it's a different model of business... for instance, the rate with which the unit evolves due to Cliff's unparalleled dedication. But such things don't really stand up to a fair comparison.
As I see it, this can be evaluated in terms of three basic categories. (1) Sound (2) Feel and (3) Features.
(3) Features we can dispense with immediately. The Eleven just doesn't match up... whether this is a detriment is a subjective question... contingient entirely upon the individual needs of the user. In my case, I could live with the more limited features of the Eleven.
(1) Sound is subject to countless variables... what equipment it's being used through (insert FRFR advocacy here) the room you're in, etc, etc, etc. Just for the record, I do NOT have FRFR monitors and though I plan to acquire them, my means of amplifiaction will leave a lot to be desired regardless of whether I choose the Axe-FX or the Eleven.
(2) FEEL, IMO, is the bottom line for comparison. As I see it, the Axe-FX's MAIN selling point, is its ability to replicate the dynamic response of an amplifier... in essence, the Axe-FX is able to BE an amp (well, preamp) rather than simply a modeler which approximates amps, typically to unsatisfactory degrees.
That said, the main question is this: does the Eleven succeed in realistically emulating the feel of an amp? How does it compare to the Axe-FX in this aspect?
Thanks in advance for your input!
Has anyone seen a comparative review of these two units? Hopefully one that attempts to be as objective, balanced, and unbiased as possible? (After all, eeeeeeeeeeverybody knows the unequivocal answer is "Axe-FX is always better"

The things the Eleven rack has going for it over the Axe-FX are an XLR mic input w/ phantom power, USB connectivity, and a rather big price reduction. First two are fairly indisputable, however, the price drop begs the question ...
Exactly WHAT does the Eleven compromise over the Axe-FX?
Sure there are countless benefits to the Axe-FX based on the fact that it's a different model of business... for instance, the rate with which the unit evolves due to Cliff's unparalleled dedication. But such things don't really stand up to a fair comparison.
As I see it, this can be evaluated in terms of three basic categories. (1) Sound (2) Feel and (3) Features.
(3) Features we can dispense with immediately. The Eleven just doesn't match up... whether this is a detriment is a subjective question... contingient entirely upon the individual needs of the user. In my case, I could live with the more limited features of the Eleven.
(1) Sound is subject to countless variables... what equipment it's being used through (insert FRFR advocacy here) the room you're in, etc, etc, etc. Just for the record, I do NOT have FRFR monitors and though I plan to acquire them, my means of amplifiaction will leave a lot to be desired regardless of whether I choose the Axe-FX or the Eleven.
(2) FEEL, IMO, is the bottom line for comparison. As I see it, the Axe-FX's MAIN selling point, is its ability to replicate the dynamic response of an amplifier... in essence, the Axe-FX is able to BE an amp (well, preamp) rather than simply a modeler which approximates amps, typically to unsatisfactory degrees.
That said, the main question is this: does the Eleven succeed in realistically emulating the feel of an amp? How does it compare to the Axe-FX in this aspect?
Thanks in advance for your input!