Digital Jams":aa364 said:Not too many questions about the tone part of the build
generalgrievous":5f980 said:I love the body shape and the finish but you need to change the headstock and inlays. They both look out of lace to me anyway. Other than that it's damn hot man.
tjon":0a094 said:
Digital Jams":751d9 said:Not too many questions about the tone part of the build
Chubtone":50fba said:Will my sales guys and the customers be able to pronounce the name?
generalgrievous":078d3 said:I love the body shape and the finish but you need to change the headstock and inlays. They both look out of lace to me anyway. Other than that it's damn hot man.
mchn13":a5eb7 said::|::QBB:
+1 on the dots, as well, it looks like a es 335 fretboard, on a horizon. i really hope the design comes together though; the neck-thru horizon-ish design is my absolute favorite. almost forgot, black hardware, also would make a difference. what are wings? mahogany?
nwright":838a6 said::|::QBB:
Nope, if that was the case, then the knob would be tilting downward, not upward. The pot shaft looks like it tilts downward a bit, but then the volume knob goes the other way. Weird.
I'm interested to see how these things play, but yeah, I agree with Pete...Something about them looks cheap. With the non- bound headstock and the plain dots and whatnot, it doesn't jell with me for some reason. I like the carved top SS style, but something about this doesn't look right. For me, a new bound headstock and no inlays at all would be better than this. Or, no binding on the neck and headstock. One or the other, not half and half.
indespise":ce4b1 said:You guys going to do a King V style model soon?
dave_mc":9eca7 said:ah, i forgot about this.
If you want to keep the cost down, not having a compound radius board might help there... I know that wouldn't really be a factor in whether or not I'd buy a guitar or not.
Maybe this has been mentioned already, though.