crankyrayhanky
Well-known member
Well since Eddie took it from someone else in the 70s and this Kiesel is splatter, whatever. I want one
Sucks about your art . That’s scummyIf it wasn't licensed, that's pretty scummy. Just had a ton of my artwork stolen and was being sold by someone else claiming rights to it, so I'm def against that kind of bullshit. Trying to be fair though, I'm gonna give Kiesel the benefit of the doubt, for now. That said; grab the pitchfork if it's theft.
They pay Holdsworth's estate, they have a headless Holdsworth in their catalog, this is a limited run of the Holdsworth model with headstock before Allan wanted a headless model. Holdsworth goes back to Carvin days.Those guitars look terrible. But I would never buy a Kiesel anyway. Hard pass. I aw they re-issued Holdsworth's guitar too. Had him in the ad for it. I wonder if they are paying anything to his estate? I highly doubt it.
Fr it was him ? Or was that a joke
Fr it was him ? Or was that a joke
The same guy that thinks their Ultra V is worth $2k to start vs the $900 they’d been forever with the same old CNC.those just simply look horrible ............. wonder who OK'ed that venture
Injustice isThe bigger injustice to me are the tips of those headstocks
I'm not a fan of anything Kiesel does. They have issued some of the fugliest headstocks known to man. Add to that, I don't like supporting douchebags.
I'd rather spend my money on an Epiphone.