Tonelover
Well-known member
Trump and Vance are going to be left holding each other's dicks when this is all over.
No one wants to hear about you giving them blowjobs at the same timeTrump and Vance are going to be left holding each other's dicks when this is all over.
Me either, but good one!No one wants to hear about you giving them blowjobs at the same time
I read that JD opposed mandated vaccines but he got one just because he wanted one. What a dope huh?No one wants to hear about you giving them blowjobs at the same time
Yes.I read that JD opposed mandated vaccines but he got one just because he wanted one. What a dope huh?
You are misguided about a lot of things though, the vaccine is Krull’s bread and butterYes.
Oh I’m very anti vax. And you are mistaken that I’m misguided in that regard at least.You are misguided
Justin Anusrar I came across a quote that made me think of you, by Ayn Rand:
"if you want to propagate an outrageously evil idea (based on traditionally accepted doctrines), your conclusion must be brazenly clear, but your proof unintelligible. Your proof must be so tangled a mess that it will paralyze a reader’s critical faculty—a mess of evasions, equivocations, obfuscations, circumlocutions, non sequiturs, endless sentences leading nowhere, irrelevant side issues, clauses, sub-clauses and sub-sub-clauses, a meticulously lengthy proving of the obvious, and big chunks of the arbitrary thrown in as self-evident, erudite references to sciences, to pseudo-sciences, to the never-to-be-sciences, to the untraceable and the approval—all of it resting on a zero: the absence of definitions."
Great, can you think of an example to illustrate this problem?That is a bit of a self fulfilling prophecy right there. My answers and opinions are always dead simple. You and others just go to great lengths to nitpick and evade the simplistic point, because by itself that point can’t be argued. You do it every time.
Sure I could just ignore them instead of going off on all the dumbass tangents you send me on though, so I’ll take fault for that.
Great, can you think of an example to illustrate this problem?
I don't recall responding to that specifically (With the study I posted), but rather the broader discussion. As I keep saying, it's kind of a moot to worry about greenhouse gasses if eliminating their source warms the planet.I say “greenhouse gases warm the earth”
You respond with an article about something else and we argue about it a week because I am trying to stay on topic and you want to relate to something else
I don't actually have a party, but even that being the case, my party is gong to win this election and everyone in them other parties are going to be left holding each other;s peen-ginas when it's over so pipe down big dawg.Trump and Vance are going to be left holding each other's dicks when this is all over.
Makes no difference what you say either. We'll see in November.By all accounts except the far far left Harris is a major underdog. Makes no difference what the brainwashed masses say.
By all accounts except the far far left Harris is a major underdog. Makes no difference what the brainwashed masses say.
If it was printed on paper it would make good asswipe.Take that for whatever you want
I'm sure all the same media that is literally on video calling her the newly appointed border czar, but is now saying she wasn't, that's just something republicans made up, would say that. They lie, they get caught lying ( Biden's dementia for example) then they lie again and act like they never said it. They should be held to account for lying about Biden's mental issues. And Kamala and KJP definitely should. They won't be though. You guys like being lied to.New York Times latest survey showed them pretty even. Take that for whatever you want