Agreed. Emulation makes sense (just not a great emulation to me). I don’t remember my Metroplex having a big low end actually, but haven’t tried a SuperplexThe key word is "emulation". When I hear that, I run the other way.
I had a 100 watt Super Plex. Very disappointing amp. So much bass I couldn't dial it back. When you turned the bass control "off", like you would on a Marshall, the sound disappeared. Great bass amp I guess. I couldn't move that boat anchor fast enough.
Getting the Super Plex was my mistake. I should have got the Metroplex.Agreed. Emulation makes sense (just not a great emulation to me). I don’t remember my Metroplex having a big low end actually, but haven’t tried a Superplex
Owned the very first production metroplex mkI.
That amp was loud AF. It does try to impose a fake compression that real 60’s Marshall’s do naturally. I’m not a VH person either and when running an SD-1 into it I just didn’t like the sound. I found it uninspiring and off sounding at the same time. This is through greenbacks.
I’m not interested in a mark ii either but that’s on me - I didn’t like how his metroplex responded to external boosts.
George has posted on TGP a bit about the MKII's internals, essentially he managed to emulate the Phase Inverter. So when you turn your master volume down this emulation manages to replicate the sound of a distorted PI.Sort of makes sense IIRC the circuit was basically a master volume Marshall with a bunch of internal filtering / eq by inductors to try to make it sound like an old Marshall. Haven't seen anything about the internal of the MkII
I had 3 of his champions.Owned the very first production metroplex mkI.
That amp was loud AF. It does try to impose a fake compression that real 60’s Marshall’s do naturally. I’m not a VH person either and when running an SD-1 into it I just didn’t like the sound. I found it uninspiring and off sounding at the same time. This is through greenbacks.
I’m not interested in a mark ii either but that’s on me - I didn’t like how his metroplex responded to external boosts.
I also learned that you must play like George, have similiar guitar set-up and most importantly a 4X12 with Greenbacks to find the fire in his amps.. the whole flavor of the vibe and the kerrang changes.Owned the very first production metroplex mkI.
That amp was loud AF. It does try to impose a fake compression that real 60’s Marshall’s do naturally. I’m not a VH person either and when running an SD-1 into it I just didn’t like the sound. I found it uninspiring and off sounding at the same time. This is through greenbacks.
I’m not interested in a mark ii either but that’s on me - I didn’t like how his metroplex responded to external boosts.
I found you had to use the onboard boost but keep the level low like between 1.5-3 and also boost it externally with your preferred Marshall boost of choice. I used an SD-1. When you keep the onboard boost level low, it keeps the mids from being hollowed out as you turn the built in boost level up. You can further tune the EQ internally but you have to open the amp up.I also learned that you must play like George, have similiar guitar set-up and most importantly a 4X12 with Greenbacks to find the fire in his amps.. the whole flavor of the vibe and the kerrang changes.
Once I ran either the Metroplex, the SuperPlex and the DVL-1 through a 4X12 with Greens=GOLD.
With the 4X12 Greens there’s a few settings with the DV-1 that bump that amp up significantly in terms of bad to the bone ramone.
Much , much better.
Go watch his demonstrations, he doesn’t play though entire song sections or ever lays into any palm mutes, he does the chord to riff thing.
So it’s difficult to pinpoint the feel & reaction of the amps in his demo’s.
We alll know the AC/DC feel.
Maybe the MKII is different?