nightlight
Well-known member
Not blanket statements. I played them plenty of times at volume (which in some ways actually made it worse) comparing to other amps as reference points and yes I tried multiple cabs and speakers, which aren’t capable anyway of fixing the issue of an amp inherently sounding synthetic like a recording. Nothing can fix that IME. It’s just the inherent sound. No IR’s and I don’t use reverb or any fx to cloud the tone of gear when I’m trying to understand their sound. It’s a huge problem in gear demos when they drench it in reverb or delay. Plenty of pickup varieties too. I do my homework and only give opinions of gear I properly tried and AB’ed with decent benchmarks. It’s just my findings and opinion. It had the Marshall flavor for sure, which of course I like, but like hearing a synthetic recording of one, sorta like comparing Sunny D to fresh squeezed OJ. I don’t care what artists used what gear (not all of them have great tone anyway). I only care about how it sounds in person when I hear it. I’m not trying to be harsh, just as honest as I can be in my findings. We also all have different taste. I don’t care for synthetic soundings amps like Engl’s or JVM’s, nor plastic-y sounding amps like EVH’s, nor quacky amps like Splawn’s, nor filtered/cardboard-y amps like the UU, Omega’s, Driftwood’s or KSR’s. For high gain I like Wizard’s, early Recto’s, Mark IIC+’s, first version Uber’s, Blueface VH4, Hermansson, Dino, Steavens, Lenz or the right modded Marshall’s. Basically amps that sound more organic/raw with more detail to the notes and more natural feelings. Just my opinion, take it or leave it
Thanks for sharing your views.
I really don't think Engls sound synthy. Highly compressed sure, but they don't sound synthetic to me.
I also wouldn't call a 5150 plasticky, I would have described it as buzzsaw-like or a can of bees. But definitely not plastic.
So I guess it just goes to show, as someone once told me on TGP, it's hosses (I say hosses) for cosses.