Yup. If you have a business and are willing to monitor / curate your sub-forum, it's all-good.
You didn't seem to have noticed that he did indeed do the 50-post, 2FA thing. He had an ad in the classifieds section but couldn't meet the requirements for specific pricing etc. 'cause "cables". I therefore suggested a manu sub-forum for him.
As for "character tests" - that approach would be a slippery slope IMHO. You can have a slot 'cause we like you but you cannot 'cause you've breached an invisible threshold of likability. We have rules. If he, like anyone else, breaks the rules sufficiently in order to get bant, he stands to lose more 'cause he'd effectively lose his sub-forum.
Lastly, one word:
Larry.
You seemed to have missed my point entirely...
Yes I did notice he had 50 posts and 2FA. But IMO those 50 posts [at the time] were gained outside the spirit of the rule. I do understand that it's an automated thing that only counts the quantity, not quality. I would argue that troll posting a giveaway and multi-posting a tuner thread is cheap posting and bad etiquette, thereby violating the spirit of the minimum post count. The rule does state:
1. You need 50 posts to PM
and 2FA enabled to buy / sell / trade here.
Cheap posting to up your count is bad etiquette, will be frowned-upon and won't win you any friends here.
And since you brought this to light, Rule 2 was also violated:
2. No unauthorized commercial postings.
With the exception of authorized commercial sellers the Classifieds Section is strictly for private party sales and is offered free of charge to members of the Rig-Talk Community. If you are a dealer or commercial seller you must PM me directly for permission to post your gear.
So here we have a person who right off the bat arguably violated the spirit of rule 1, flat out broke rule 2, had zero presence on R/T, the little that was established were troll posts, and then handed a sub forum. Not only that, it was suggested to him by a moderator that he should have a manu. sub forum. Please explain to me how that does not suggest any random Joe Blow off the street can have a sub forum no questions asked and not put (or at min. have potential to put) R/T in a bad light.
My point is there are rules and standards to post in the classifieds, but none to be granted a manufacturers sub forum. They can just be handed out like Halloween candy. I wouldn't count have a business or monitor/curate as actual rules either. One, it's not written as an official rule/policy anywhere. Two, half the subs aren't monitored anymore and nothing about that is enforced. Three, Is it even verified that the person does indeed have a legitimate business before giving them a sub?
Mentioning Larry again says you entirely missed the point.
To reiterate my point, there's no minimum standard to be granted a manu. sub forum. My statement about building forum cred wasn't about likeability or "character tests". It was about establishing a presence on R/T before being handed a sub forum; just like Rule 1 for the classifieds. Off the top of my head; be a member for X amount of time, have X number of posts (excluding OTC), show that you actually have a product. Establishing a presence happens to have a secondary effect of showing character, but isn't the main purpose.
Let me put out a hypothetical...
Brand new member joins up and says "I make/sell guitar strings can I have a sub forum?" As things stand now that would be granted. Other members buy sets of strings. Turns out this dude is a fraud and people get packs of office depot rubber bands. What do you think is going to be the first questions asked? I suspect it would be how/why did he get a sub forum in the first place and who gave it to him? Yeah the guy is a scammer, but it ultimately falls on Rig-Talk for not having a set standard and giving him the platform with no questions asked. And as it stands the guy could still keep his sub forum. It wouldn't take but one bad situation for R/T to lose credibility and gain a rep. as a place for scammers. On top of that, the mod who gave out the sub forum is going to be called into question and likely have their good name sullied.
Now let's say the guy ultimately was a scammer, but this time around there were minimum standards set to receive a sub forum. Let's say member for 90 days, 200 posts (excluding OTC posts), and presented some form of proof of product (website, facebook, a simple picture). And let's put and agreement to actions deemed "a violation of trust/scamming" would result in termination of sub forum for good measure. Dude turns out to be a scammer anyway. This go around fault lies 100% on him. R/T & mods did their due diligence to ensure the safety of it's members and presumably delete the sub forum. The situation would still suck, but has a completely different vibe on the side of R/T and mods; their reputations aren't put in jeopardy.
To wrap thigs up I do want to emphasize a few things:
1. I understand this whole thing stemmed from a misunderstanding and led to a crappy looking situation. I'm in no way trying to single any one person out as being at fault, not legitimate or anything like that; that goes for both members and mods. It just so happened that this all brought some deficiencies that could lead to a really bad situation to light.
2. My overreaching reason for posting any of this is for the wellbeing of Rig-Talk as a whole. I don't want to see the forum go downhill because of an oversight. I also don't want to see a mod get put in a compromising situation that would put their individual reputation on the line. As far as this conversation is concerned, both of these seem easily preventable by IMO establishing some minimum standards for being granted a manufacturer sub forum.