
rsm
Well-known member
yes; but it costs money to fight it in court. they leave me alone, I leave them alone. seems to work. until it doesn'tYour county is in violation of the law. You could sue them, but you don't have standing.
yes; but it costs money to fight it in court. they leave me alone, I leave them alone. seems to work. until it doesn'tYour county is in violation of the law. You could sue them, but you don't have standing.
When it used to snow here, the only emergencies we really had were snow storms. And anyone going out in those, unless for an absolute emergency, we’re assholes IMO. Just stay the fuck home so people can plow the roads.they also impose curfews during hurricanes, along with mandatory evacuations; and they often deploy the National Guard. It's crazy. IMO
IDK, I don't think I would voluntarily comply with anyone trying to take my firearms during an emergency situation.They did that with Katrina because assholes were opening fire on first responders. So they had to stop first responders from actually saving people. If I’m choosing between taking an asshole’s gun with an un-damaging collateral, of also temporarily taking a gun from a law abiding person (who also should have left if they could) and allowing innocent civilians to be saved after a devastating storm, it’s an easy choice. I’m not anti-2A and shoot myself but we have a lot of dumbass gun owners in this nation and to act like they did during an extreme emergency was heinous. So fuck them and their guns.
exactly. I just stay the fuck home during hurricanes and mandatory evacuations.When it used to snow here, the only emergencies we really had were snow storms. And anyone going out in those, unless for an absolute emergency, we’re assholes IMO. Just stay the fuck home so people can plow the roads.
Well, then you’re either going to get taken into custody or shot by the National Guard. Those guys are not gonna give a shit about your personal stance or defiant Internet posts when there are lives on the line and they’ve been given a direct order under Emergency powers.IDK, I don't think I would voluntarily comply with anyone trying to take my firearms during an emergency situation.
The people shooting at first responders weren’t the ones they were disarming.They did that with Katrina because assholes were opening fire on first responders. So they had to stop first responders from actually saving people. If I’m choosing between taking an asshole’s gun with an un-damaging collateral, of also temporarily taking a gun from a law abiding person (who also should have left if they could) and allowing innocent civilians to be saved after a devastating storm, it’s an easy choice. I’m not anti-2A and shoot myself but we have a lot of dumbass gun owners in this nation and to act like they did during an extreme emergency was heinous. So fuck them and their guns.
They didn’t have the time or ability to be that precise about it. They’re not gonna waste time investigating who’s doing the shooting in such a dire emergency. They are going to hit that nail with the biggest hammer they have to get on with trying to save peoples lives. Definitely a case of ask for forgiveness not permission.The people shooting at first responders weren’t the ones they were disarming.
Not any more. Know why ? Because after that bullshit laws were put in place preventing it. As fucked Jonas this country is there’s no fucking way in hell the national guard is shooting someone down in their own home for refusing to give them their guns. Those mother fuckers don’t even have the right to come in and search.Well, then you’re either going to get taken into custody or shot by the National Guard. Those guys are not gonna give a shit about your personal stance or defiant Internet posts when there are lives on the line and they’ve been given a direct order under Emergency powers.
You sound like Thumbpicker now.They didn’t have the time or ability to be that precise about it. They’re not gonna waste time investigating who’s doing the shooting in such a dire emergency. They are going to hit that nail with the biggest hammer they have to get on with trying to save peoples lives. Definitely a case of ask for forgiveness not permission.
Are you sure that’s the case? Even when a state of emergency has been declared? It may just come down to the discretion of the Guard themselves or local leadership. What do you think would happen if in a devastated area under intense conditions, knowing there’s thousands of people need medical, rescue and evacuation and you have one guy doing his best bunker impersonation refusing to give up his weapons, holding up those efforts?Not any more. Know why ? Because after that bullshit laws were put in place preventing it. As fucked Jonas this country is there’s no fucking way in hell the national guard is shooting someone down in their own home for refusing to give them their guns. Those mother fuckers don’t even have the right to come in and search.
I know, was just kidding.nope, I said useless and meant it; Lenin called them useful and they were useful to him; they're not useful to me.
I'd like to give them a free one-way ticket to Cuba, Venezuela, Gaza or eastern Ukraine, and let them figure the rest out for themselves
Yep, those pesky Constitutional rights get in the way of totalitarians, tyrants and Gestapo just following orders.They didn’t have the time or ability to be that precise about it. They’re not gonna waste time investigating who’s doing the shooting in such a dire emergency. They are going to hit that nail with the biggest hammer they have to get on with trying to save peoples lives. Definitely a case of ask for forgiveness not permission.
It depends on the state. Louisiana being one that passed laws forbidding it in the aftermath of Katrina. And no national guards do not have the authority to dictate operational rules of engagement on the fly. Not even during the Ferguson riots.Are you sure that’s the case? Even when a state of emergency has been declared? It may just come down to the discretion of the Guard themselves or local leadership. What do you think would happen if in a devastated area under intense conditions, knowing there’s thousands of people need medical, rescue and evacuation and you have one guy doing his best bunker impersonation refusing to give up his weapons, holding up those efforts?
If you're the government and knocking on my door and want to come in, then have a warrant to enter my property.Well, then you’re either going to get taken into custody or shot by the National Guard. Those guys are not gonna give a shit about your personal stance or defiant Internet posts when there are lives on the line and they’ve been given a direct order under Emergency powers.
exactly, that investment would pay off exponentially, and start immediately after the first boatload or planeload left.I know, was just kidding.
As to the second part; that would mean using our tax dollars for something beneficial![]()
a state of emergency does not suspend our Constitutional rights.Are you sure that’s the case? Even when a state of emergency has been declared? It may just come down to the discretion of the Guard themselves or local leadership. What do you think would happen if in a devastated area under intense conditions, knowing there’s thousands of people need medical, rescue and evacuation and you have one guy doing his best bunker impersonation refusing to give up his weapons, holding up those efforts?
Like a remake of "Forbidden Planet" with modern-day CGI ?As to the second part; that would mean using our tax dollars for something beneficial![]()
Shit man, modern CGI might actually be a lot less cool than what they did in 1956. Love the way that movie looks.Like a remake of "Forbidden Planet" with modern-day CGI ?
![]()
Right ?Shit man, modern CGI might actually be a lot less cool than what they did in 1956. Love the way that movie looks.