data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43a41/43a412c8d9bba1a927959db47fdfa8dfee3b5c01" alt="MetalHeart"
MetalHeart
Well-known member
Great album
Not just crunchy, but magically very chewy and juicy at the same time.Amazing album and also sounds great. What I think of when I think of a crunchy Marshall (besides Angus)!
I don’t know man…magical? Lol. It’s a just a decent, Gibson into Marshall rock tone. It’s because the music is so good that maybe it makes the tone seem stellar? I’m not saying it’s a bad tone, because it’s not, but it doesn’t stand out to me over any other rock/metal band of the time.Not just crunchy, but magically very chewy and juicy at the same time.
Interested to know if anyone knows what Steve Clarke was using gear/signal wise, aside from a Les Paul into a Marshall?
Well, can you name one album from, say, '78 to '82 with the same level of gain (so less than VH, probably slightly more than AC/DC basically), but with that same chewiness? And sure the songs rock well, so that helps...but for me, the tone definitely stands out.I don’t know man…magical? Lol. It’s a just a decent, Gibson into Marshall rock tone. It’s because the music is so good that maybe it makes the tone seem stellar? I’m not saying it’s a bad tone, because it’s not, but it doesn’t stand out to me over any other rock/metal band of the time.