Ear Candy speakers

  • Thread starter Thread starter richedie
  • Start date Start date
remocity":289ie0sa said:
What can you compare them to soundwise?
Click to expand...


I am not really sure to be honest. I will say that when I first got them, they were bright, slightly harsh on the top, and didn't have as much depth. But they broke in really quick, and I am most happy with them now. I have not had a whole lot of other speaker experience, but have played through V30's, Gt12-75's, and GH30's significantly, apart from stock speakers like mesa black shadow and fenders.

I would say they are probally most like Gt12-75's or GH30's, but more even tonally and tighter on the bottom. I always had a problem with flub with the 75's and a hollow midrange with a bass heavy amp. I can get an even tone out of them, and they are pretty versatile. Maybe not as sweet as others, but I am liking them over my celestion priors. I can record a clip if you would like???? just name what kind of sound , heavy, lighter drive....???
 
IMHO....MUCH beter than any Celestions I have ever played. I have all three EC speakers.
 
I didn't like the Sugars at all. I felt they were very hollow, and didn't have much mid-range at all. Clean stuff sounded great, and mid-gain was good. But for me, the high-gain tones through them sucked. The green Machines were much better, when they were at high volumes. At low volumes, they were fizzy at least to me. Compared to a Celestion K-100 I didn't think either speaker stood next to them. The K-100 had a warmer mid-range, and a better, tighter low end. The highs were just perfect on the K-100s.

So for me, I didn't like the Ear Candy speakers at all, minus the Green Machine. The GM was good, just not as good for me as the K100.

Eric
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top