Purpleibby":3h0ck3j4 said:
Both amps sound great...but I have no idea why dude set up the Friedman like he did....look at the controls...he's not setting them up for a comparable amount of cut. That's what I hate about these demos(stop looking at the knobs and use you ears)....the JCM800 in inherently brighter and you have to basically fight to keep it from being too bright(presence and treble are BELOW noon) ...The BE100 is more balanced, but look at the controls.....he's barely above 12 oclock on the treble and presence....there's room to add some cut and he's just not doing it.
Wish folks would stop looking at where the dial is set and use your ears.
As far as feel and attack I like the Friedman better but he needs to dial in more cut(really I'd dial in the Friedman completely differently than him)
I'd choose the BE100 and put the treble or presence at 1 oclock on both or close(maybe 1 and 1:30...wouldn't take much to balance the difference....the 800 is brighter by nature he has the presence treble below noon.
I didn't set the EQ by looking at it. I turned on the amp and played through what I thought sounded good. And then I did the same with the Marshall. When I play the Friedman live, that's generally where I have the EQ set. In this recording (to my ears) the Marshall has too much high end that I would probably end up cutting out with a post EQ if I was putting it in a mix anyways. If you'll look back in the thread, I made this post:
"They can definitely be dialed to sound more similar to one another. Comparison videos are always a little goofy in that respect because it's just a snapshot of two different amp settings but it's good fun! Personally, I'm going with the Friedman as it's my main recording / gigging amp, but I do love them both for different reasons. Thanks so much for checking out the video!"