Picasso
Well-known member
You know who you are…
@Aynirar27 What makes you say that?she’s quite adept at jumping to preformed conclusions. I can see why you like her
You just don't want anyone to know you're all in.she’s quite adept at jumping to preformed conclusions. I can see why you like her
Right? How dare they condemn that!Two assholes they are.
It casts a huge net of protection against many things and people. Thinking pedophiles is one of them is a huge stretchYou just don't want anyone to know you're all in.
So you're for it then.It casts a huge net of protection against many things and people. Thinking pedophiles is one of them is a huge stretch
Yea I am. But I also don’t believe it will in any way enable or promote pedophiliaSo you're for it then.
Sure you don’t.Yea I am. But I also don’t believe it will in any way enable or promote pedophilia
If you care to share where it specifically talks about decriminalizing pedophilia, then I will totally eat my words.Sure you don’t.
Until then, @PinkInMyAsshole can eat shit.If you care to share where it specifically talks about decriminalizing pedophilia, then I will totally eat my words.
This ^fuck the UN....
Page 6:
https://icj2.wpenginepowered.com/wp...ciples-FINAL-printer-version-1-MARCH-2023.pdf
The Principles are based on general principles of criminal law and international
human rights law and standards. They seek to offer a clear, accessible and workable
legal framework – as well as practical legal guidance – on applying the criminal law
to conduct associated with:
sexual and reproductive health and rights, including termination of pregnancy;
consensual sexual activities, including in contexts such as sex outside marriage,
same-sex sexual relations, adolescent sexual activity and sex work;
gender identity and gender expression;
HIV non-disclosure, exposure or transmission;
drug use and the possession of drugs for personal use; and
homelessness and poverty.
Rights such as?That is still broad. Page 22 goes in to it much deeper, but it is not implying free range of sex with any age person you want.
It seems to be much more focused on protecting the rights of an underaged person more so than enabling others to prey on them
So something that has been going on recently is we have been seeing a push to give power to adolescents in which if they give consent then sex with a person of any age should be considered "ok" which works in conjunction with what you see in the above. If P is now added to the string of LGBTQetc, these people can't be witheld from expressing and acting on their sexual orientation is what this is moving towards.That is still broad. Page 22 goes in to it much deeper, but it is not implying free range of sex with any age person you want.
It seems to be much more focused on protecting the rights of an underaged person more so than enabling others to prey on them