Is Quartersawn Maple really better?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SpiderWars
  • Start date Start date
SpiderWars

SpiderWars

Well-known member
Intuitively it seems like it would be a bit more stable but is stability even an issue with decent flat-sawn Maple? I guess I'm curious if it just SEEMS like an improvement or if it really makes a difference that one could feel/hear. The Warmoth/USA Custom necks I've bought were all QS and I just snagged a 1-pc QS Musikraft on Reverb so I must be assuming QS is better but I can't say from firsthand experience/comps that it's any better. Yet I pay extra for it. :confused:
 
Some guys like Tom Anderson swear by flat sawn, and the neck on every Anderson I've had was extremely stabile. And I've had a quarter sawn neck that would go bonkers some times. But others that have been fine.

It's probably more important that whatever the cut, it's grain is straight and it's been properly acclimated.
 
I've built many strats, including all the ones pictured here: www.sparkguitars.com

Some of my necks are quartersawn, some are flatsawn, some are one-piece, others are two piece. It's very hard to describe the difference quartersawn necks make, and it's very hard to even tell a difference, but there is a difference. Quartersawn necks are my favorite necks. I also have an Eric Johnson strat which has a quartersawn neck, by the way. There is just something about them in the way they sustain and snap, and I really like it, but I couldn't tell you exactly what it is. I can barely tell the difference, but whatever it is, I can appreciate it.

It also looks absolutely fantastic. Just check out an Eric Johnson strat or look at my surf green strat and you'll see what I'm talking about. One other thing is that I have to do less fret leveling than flatsawn Maple. However, in my experience with roasted Maple, it also seems very stable, so whatever they cut stays true. All of my quartersawn and roasted necks have required the least fret leveling. It's not like that 100% of the time, but it's more consistent than flatsawn Maple in my experience.

Like I said though, the main difference is cosmetic. I think the advantage of quartersawn is marginal or hardly perceptible, but when you've worked with enough woods, I think you can pick up on some of the nuances even though you may not be able to articulate what it is.
 
I wouldn't pay the extra dollars for one if you are basing it on "sounding/being" better. But if you want one because it looks cool then yeah pay the extra
 
I think maybe the quality of the wood might make more of a stability difference than the direction of the cut. Cheap/low grade quartersawn neck is likely inferior to a super high grade piece that is flat sawn. Just for argument's sake. But I'm no luthier so I have no idea
 
It's more stable and less likely to warp... better is in the ears of the beholder and the hands of the builder. YMMV.
 
I've never bought a guitar based on QS or not. It's a feature I never look for and will skim over in the specs list of a guitar. Just never thought about it much at all. I've had some and I can't say I can tell a difference.
 
Better? Depends on what you prefer. To me they feel stiffer and sound snappier (in general but of course wood quality and kind are more dominant). So if you want that they are the better choice.
 
I did replace the neck on my Warmoth and during the interim had a cheaper WD Music neck on it for a while. The new neck is QS Maple with Pao Ferro board and it is definitely snappier. I didn't attribute that to the QS Maple but maybe that was a contributor. I kind of expected a little less snap.

I do think it looks cool but once your 10 feet away or so I can't see any difference.
 
Different necks just sound different IME. Even with the same woods. I've swapped around maybe half a dozen flat sawn, rosewood board Strat necks. They're just all a bit different.
 
I like quartersawn myself and have had no issues with many necks I have. I do prefer quartersawn and one piece maple (no lam fretboard unless ebonay or rosewood)
 
Back
Top