John4021 Ghosted me with missing money on guitar

  • Thread starter Thread starter innogator
  • Start date Start date
I

innogator

Member
Short version:
I purchased a Jackson RR1 from @John4021 back in February and received it with damage. John refused any accountability to make it right and has ghosted me at this point. I had to push a claim through PayPal which took over a month to get most of my money back but I'm still out of pocket $183.

The deal thread with all the context has been deleted but I had it archived here for reference. You can see my pics and initial comments. I can post before/after pics as well if that's helpful: web.archive.org

Long version:
I purchased the guitar with the original case, which John wanted extra for since it was oversized. So we agreed on $2650 shipped as the final price. He said he was good with PP G&S and I asked him send over an invoice. After payment he then noticed he was short because of fees since he didn't build those into the invoice, so I sent over $93 PP F&F to make him square, so $2743 total. He had trouble with the invoice initially so I didn't want to ask him to go through the trouble of redoing it, my mistake in hindsight.

I received the Jackson damaged as noted in my comments in the thread (linked above); most importantly the ebony fretboard was significantly cracked from fret 22 all the way up to fret 5 with an obvious glue repair attempt. This, along with a chipped corner, pretty significant fretwear, and the case being damaged (all of which were explicitly described as mint in the listing) was too much to overlook. So I reached out to John the next day (Feb 14th). He acted surprised and concerned it was damaged but offered no recourse. I asked about a shipping claim which he said was too much trouble in the past. I then asked to just ship the guitar back in which John replied "Dont want it back. No telling how the damage happened", he then proceeded to tell me I got a great deal and should basically just accept it. I pushed back with listing photos showing the damage existed before shipping if you know where to look, but the quality of the pictures were bad so it wasn't obvious. He then told me "Never saw the ebony crack. DONE DEAL" and blocked me on RigTalk.

At that point I opened a PayPal dispute and posted in the deal thread, which blew up. This apparently created some pressure for him to do the right thing. After a few days he then messaged me and offered to trade a 50's Les Paul Standard. It was a nice guitar but I declined as I have too many LPs and the market value doesn't align with the Jackson, but told him I would be open to trades to offset value as long as I came out even value wise. I also told him I was reaching out to Luthiers to inquire about repairing the fretboard and he was good with that and even recommended a guy. The next day I heard back from multiple guitar shops I had reached out to and every single one said that with the crack being so prominent and right above the truss rod that they would have concerns around structural integrity and recommended I return the guitar if it were an option. I then told John I would not be keeping the Jackson as I didn't want to have to deal with the worry of that, but I was still open to working out an amicable deal somehow. At that point John ghosted me and I haven't heard from him since Feb 20th.

The PayPal dispute was longer than necessary because he was not providing them info until the deadlines, but PayPal ultimately decided in my favor to return the guitar for a refund. I had to purchase a $90 shipping label for an oversized package, signature required, and insured for the correct amount ($2833 out of pocket total). He received the guitar March 14 but again let the PayPal deadline of saying he received it go to the last day so I finally got refunded for $2650 yesterday (Mar 25th), 39 days after I told him there was a problem. I then messaged him and reminded that I had paid $2743 and would appreciate being squared up the $93 original payment and that I would eat the cost of shipping back. Still no reply since Feb 20th.

My honest opinion is that if you've had to deal with John4021 and it was smooth, it was just because you didn't have any issues with the gear because he does not stand by making a deal right if there's a problem. The responses I received were condescending to say the least and blocking someone doesn't make your problems go away. The guitar was very obviously not insured when shipped, which was part of the problem as well, although I do believe the guitar had these problems before shipping. I have no doubt that if I didn't have purchase protection that I would be out my full payment price and be stuck with a damaged guitar I'd have to get fixed. I would recommend avoiding deals with @John4021, especially anything high end.
 
I’ve been following this since before you bought it. Definitely sucks to see how it turned out for both parties, but it is a shame there was no integrity on his part. Be hard to trust the right thing will be done in the future for future sales. Hopefully the admins here take it serious and take action to prevent it from happening to someone else. Beautiful guitar otherwise but the problems it had BEFORE being shipped definitely kills the value and I don’t blame you one bit about wanting a FULL refund to make it a DONE DEAL!
 
Wasn't there a middle party trying to get stuff square?

This is absolutely BS.

Also, kind of shitty that the original thread was erased. This is why I don't do deals like this. I still haven't done the 2FA thing, just to keep me from even commenting on items.

This is a credibility ruining transaction, and is very discouraging. Yes, Buyer beware and all that, but this is unacceptable.

Sorry you went through it, but it could have been worse. Guess we all will learn and proceed accordingly. All one can do is to hold each other accountable. That is the only way this crap works.

My rule is; Don't be a douche, be honest and fair, square business. Too many asswipes in this world, definitely don't need anymore.
 
Wasn't there a middle party trying to get stuff square?
There was for a couple days after he initially blocked me. That person was very easy to talk to and level headed about the situation, I much preferred talking to that person tbh. Then once the thread blew up, John reached out to me directly so the middleman went away. Agree, it's just been poorly handled but could've been a lot worse. Would think someone with such a long standing reputation would want to do the right thing.
 
Hard for a trust based system to work when
There was for a couple days after he initially blocked me. That person was very easy to talk to and level headed about the situation, I much preferred talking to that person tbh. Then once the thread blew up, John reached out to me directly so the middleman went away. Agree, it's just been poorly handled but could've been a lot worse. Would think someone with such a long standing reputation would want to do the right thing.
after the way this unfolded if I was you and everyone else in this thread I wouldn’t buy a piece of bubble gum from him for the fact it might be pre chewed lmao
 
Would think someone with such a long standing reputation would want to do the right thing.
This is why I'm so confused. Not trying to pile on, or even talk ill, I just expected better. Especially considering all the members that spoke on his behalf.

This event makes me never want to do a deal on this site. Especially when sellers want more protection than the buyer should need, if it's a square deal.

It shakes a users confidence in the credibility of any user. If one seller held in this high regard can land another in this type of situation, how can a user trust another...ever. This is where I am. Just surprised.
 
Last edited:
It shakes a users confidence in the credibility of any user. If one seller held in this high regard can land another in this type of situation, how can a user trust another...ever. This is where I am. Just surprised.
And I fully understand that with me being a newer member, this calls questions to my credibility as well. That's not ideal to me either since I'm interested in a ton of stuff that gets posted. I just couldn't let this go without being called out.
 
Before we go on a witch hunt, i would think there is a reason original thread has been deleted. And I would find out why before I jumped the gun. I still believe in John until the rest comes out
 
Before we go on a witch hunt, i would think there is a reason original thread has been deleted. And I would find out why before I jumped the gun. I still believe in John until the rest comes out
king-diamond-king.webp
 
Before we go on a witch hunt, i would think there is a reason original thread has been deleted. And I would find out why before I jumped the gun. I still believe in John until the rest comes out
The proof is all over the place. The fact he can’t take accountability or much less handle business himself says a lot about his character. If the thread didn’t have the damage shown in John’s pictures then I could see being skeptical, but there is no denying it.
 
The proof is all over the place. The fact he can’t take accountability or much less handle business himself says a lot about his character. If the thread didn’t have the damage shown in John’s pictures then I could see being skeptical, but there is no denying it.
Sure. Optics arent good. But it took a moderator to delete thread, and I trust our mods to only do so for good reason
 
Sure. Optics arent good. But it took a moderator to delete thread, and I trust our mods to only do so for good reason
Maybe a mod will chime in then. For all we know they could have deleted it to save the last bit of dignity he may have, but I’d be willing to bet it was just so it didn’t turn into a shit slinging contest
 
John reached out for me to repair the guitar. Which was surprising because I was one of the ones pointing out the crack is clearly visible in the listing pictures and John knew about it.

Given the drama, the further potential for shipping damages, I declined to repair the guitar.
Probably best. This is a mess.

I want to give everyone the benefit of doubt. I am not judging any member. It's just a shame.
 
this dude is out of his mind,
I told him keep it and I'd help with what he considered repairs.
Then he calls a luthier who said guitar wasn't worthy of fixing; The guy he called didn't even see the guitar.
Puts a dispute against me on PayPal who gave him his moneys owed. The money he got is what PayPal says
since they are the final word.

Now this baby comes to bitch about $95.00 shipping??? As far as I am concerned, he is a scam artist,

I took the Jackson to a Luthier that fixed small cracks,
This guy is known for his workmanship and does vintage guitar work.
Real talented guy.
Plays great now as it did back then.

I am not going into the whole sale/deal but I stand by what I saw.
Then he claims a paint chip on one wings corners...more bullshit lies.

You got squared away with PayPal. Taked your money and stop crying.
 
Nice response

Never said it wasn't worthy of fixing, they all said they could fill the gap with glue but warned there could be structural issues later. Not something I should have to deal with on a "DEAD MINT" guitar. I don't claim to be a luthier so I take their word for it.

If you'd read the story of events it's $90 shipping which I wasn't even trying to get back, it's the $93 payment I sent you because you invoiced me the wrong amount.

1742922816444.png
 
You got the guitar back and money on top to boot. If you think that's an honest deal then that's further evidence you shouldn't be doing deals with people.
 
You got the guitar back and money on top to boot. If you think that's an honest deal then that's further evidence you shouldn't be doing deals with people.
The anger in little man’s response says everything there is to say about the situation
 
Here's my unanswered questions @John4021

  • Why do you think I should only get a partial refund? You know I sent a second payment because you invoiced me wrong. I have the receipts and the conversation we were having at the time.
  • Why did I have to go through PayPal to get any resolution to this and it took 39 days? You blocked me and wrote me off when I said there was an issue. You would've completely ripped me off if I didn't have any buyer protection.

I want to hear your side of how it's justified for me to be out of pocket $183 for receiving a damaged guitar. The discussion of if the guitar can be fixed is irrelevant, it was received damage and you don't get to dictate what the buyer should be happy with. I would have never bought it if I weren't expecting it to be in the condition you described it as.
 
I remember reading, "closing because there's a middle man" in the last thread and thinking..."that's stupid."
Looks like that was indeed stupid.
 
Back
Top