Looking at Bogners but want enough sustain/gain...

  • Thread starter Thread starter tallcoolone
  • Start date Start date
tallcoolone

tallcoolone

Well-known member
Had a Shiva and was very disappointed in the fact that I needed a boost in front to get any sort of modern gain tone. To be honest, it kind of turned me off to Bogners for years. I like amps that have more (of just about everything) on tap than I need and I do not ever use dirt boxes. Interested in some of the Bogners (Helios, Atma) but really want to make sure that I'm not going to run into the same situation. While I do play a lot of low and mid gain stuff, I have no issues physically turning the "Gain" knob counterclockwise for those situations. But for the modern rock stuff I really do not want to be "wanting more". Like the aforementioned Shiva, I will have to purchase without any chance to play the amp as I am in the northeastern US--nowhere close to try any out up here in the great white North.

In particular I am interested in the Helios, Atma and Goldfinger. Not so much wanting a super-modern voicing, just something with enough gain and sustain. I play in small to med sized clubs but am in a pretty loud band. Anyone with experience with one or more of these amps?
 
I had a Goldfinger 90. Awesome tones but definitely NOT what Id call a "high gain" amp. I had to boost it. And I think the Helios is more of a modded plexi tone...but also capable of some high gain from what the videos have shown.
I now have a Shiva 20th anniversary, and Im very happy with it. It has more than enough gain on tap, and it can do modern and classic tones.
 
Yeah, "more than enough" is what I'm looking for...and to be honest, most of the time I don't use it. Kind of wish the Bogner videos would plainly show where the dials are set on the amps that we are are hearing. The one Helios video with all the artsy/b&w/fade in/out stuff scrolls across the controls, but unfortunately it's not of the amp that is actually plugged in...
 
I've been ready to pull the trigger on a few xtc's but am worried myself that the gain won't quite be enough.
Or just to spongy and or compressed.
 
tpruitt":bafkbqu2 said:
I've been ready to pull the trigger on a few xtc's but am worried myself that the gain won't quite be enough.
Or just to spongy and or compressed.

Go with the 20th line or the Twin jet. More open sounding for sure, but those same great chewy Bogner mids.
 
I've seen a few with the marvel mod and loaded with kt88's and decent prices.
the 20th is just a little out of reach right now but maybe after one of my Marshall's sell.
 
The 20th XTC has gain...no reason you would need to boost.
I like the Blue channel and NOT at "gain on 10" either.
Plus, you have the Red channel that is higher gain.

Then, you have a plexi mode and a variety of switches to vary tones.
Personally, I would need a boost in the plexi mode, but then again if I need a boost I just use Blue in non-plexi.

There's lot's of XTC guys around here, chime in...

IMO, you might want to wait to get an 20th XTC, but try others as well :D
 
I too am interested in the amount of gain the xtc produces Im kinda in the same boat I'm debating offing my mark v for an xtc but it has been the only thing holding me back I had a bogner uber twin jet for a short while I loved the brutality but I need more versatility as its my only amp and I play a lot of styles If the xtc does have the gain how tight is it. XTC guys please chime in...
 
psche378":1h6klkjh said:
I too am interested in the amount of gain the xtc produces... the xtc does have the gain how tight is it. XTC guys please chime in...
quick answer--yes and yes, if you dial it in right. :thumbsup: i have both a Mark V and a 101B.

long answer with more details, hopefully tonight when i have a minute. :D
 
cool man thanks for the response I would defiantly enjoy the long story if you get time tonight
 
psche378":2ib5hnz1 said:
I too am interested in the amount of gain the xtc produces... the xtc does have the gain how tight is it. XTC guys please chime in...
OK, long answer: :D

i have a Mark V and a 101B. i play metal, hard rock, and classic rock; chunky metal like Dream Theater or Puppets/Lightning era Metallica. not super-tight djent stuff like Meshuggah (they are the most badass ever; i just can't play it. :lol: :LOL: )

the XTC Red channel circuit in 2004 was changed to have more gain. you may know about the Marvel mod; that's a dude's mod circuit board that lets you switch between the pre-2004 lower gain Red channel, the post-2004 higher gain Red channel, and another higher gain Red mod from Mark Cameron. my 101B has the Marvel mod board and a mod i did to the unboosted sound to make it brighter (clipped out cap C224). i also run high gain preamp tubes and high output pickups.

my XTC Blue channel, i use with the Boost off for classic rock, the same way i use my Mark V channel 2 Crunch mode w/o graphic EQ. it works great. my Blue gain is about 11 o'clock; my Mark V Crunch Gain is noon and Treble is 3 o'clock. my XTC Blue channel with the Boost, i use for hard rock, like Alice in Chains, Pearl Jam, etc; the same way i use my Mark V channel 3 Mk IIC+ mode. Blue gain still 11 o'clock; Mark V IIC+ Gain 1 o'clock, Treble 1 o'clock, w/ graphic EQ and Bright switch. with Blue gain at 11 o'clock and Boost on is plenty to get Alice in Chains, etc.

my XTC Red channel, i use for chunky metal and thrash, like Puppets-era Metallica, the same way as my Mark V channel 3 Mk IV mode. i use the post-2004 higher gain setting, because it sounds tighter. it has a ton of gain; i only set it at 10 o'clock. i also use it without the Boost. adding the Boost gives even more gain and makes it really saturated; too much gain for me to control or keep tight. so Red definitely has tons of gain, especially with that post-2004 higher gain mod, and with the Boost.

some of the XTC settings make a big difference for me on the tightness. i run B1 bright 1 on both Blue and Red. it sounds tighter than either N or B2. the post-2004 higher gain setting on the Red sounds much tighter than the pre-2004 lower gain setting or the Cameron mod. on Blue, i run the Excursion control, which adjusts the low-end looseness, on the middle setting, so it's not too tight but not too loose. but on Red, i run the Excursion on the tight setting. it's not a dry tightness, like a VHT. it sounds and feels similar to the Mark V Mk IV mode--thick and saturated and not loose; a wet sort of tightness. which is always good, right? :lol: :LOL:

the cleans on both are equally good--both based on classic Fender designs.

i think the XTC is quite versatile. not as super-versatile as the Mark V, but i only use 3-4 modes on the Mark V anyway, and 3-4 of the XTC's six modes. i think the XTC sounds a bit more rich and 3D, but it costs more. they're both great amps; similar in style and features but different enough to not be a repeat. :rock:
 
I've never found a Bogner that had enough gain for me personally, but if you have enough for your heaviest rhythm sounds, I don't see why you'd be opposed to a boost/dirt pedal for leads, lots of guys do that. I know what you're saying, I never wanted to use dirt pedals either, I wanted the amp to do the work, but sometimes it's just not feasible to run it that way. How far into the north east are you ? Matt's Music is a Bogner dealer in Massachusetts on the south shore, or King Guitar is a dealer in RI..or you could go to Boston Guitar Works in Brockton Ma...they were/are ? a dealer for Bogner.
 
All the XTC's I've played had far more gain than I'd use. I actually keep my red channel gain around 9:30.
 
I've only played the original XTC, and it didn't have enough. Played a first series Uber and that wasn't enough, and a first Shiva (combo)...also not enough...all of this would be for soloing only, for rhythm sounds they were fine.
 
Back
Top