napalmdeath
Well-known member
Anybody have any insight on the MC90?
GuitarGoat":35eq1gkk said:This is all what I've read online, not firsthand experience, so take it as that. From what I've heard they're an old version of the CL-80 that Mesa liked so had them keep making those for them under the new name. They're similar to the current CL-80 but not the same. I'm actually getting some more in a couple of days...I really like them! I think I liked my Thiele cabinet better with the C-90 than the EVM actually...
napalmdeath":kriycprt said:GuitarGoat":kriycprt said:This is all what I've read online, not firsthand experience, so take it as that. From what I've heard they're an old version of the CL-80 that Mesa liked so had them keep making those for them under the new name. They're similar to the current CL-80 but not the same. I'm actually getting some more in a couple of days...I really like them! I think I liked my Thiele cabinet better with the C-90 than the EVM actually...
I run 2 Thiele 1x12's with my JVM and they sound MASSIVE. Better than any 2x12 cab I ever owned.
thegame":2uowxxrf said:Both the MC90 and CL80 can sound 'pretty good' until you've heard an original G12-80, from which they're both derived. The oldies have all the superior definition of the former two (compared to most lower wattage Celestions) but instead of the somewhat sterile and characterless mids of the MC90/CL80, the old 80's have a super aggressive, crunchy midrange thats very British sounding.
thegame":l8zmfmim said:sterile and characterless mids of the MC90/CL80, the old 80's have a super aggressive, crunchy midrange thats very British sounding.
This is what I find with mine. Described to a tee.. My JVM is tight, and focused. Of course, the OCD as a boost helps to tighten it, but I believe the speakers only enhance that.Gainfreak":3jszviqs said:My speakers are very warm, have plenty of bass ,tons of killler sounding mids.
napalmdeath":2i8m61ro said:thegame":2i8m61ro said:sterile and characterless mids of the MC90/CL80, the old 80's have a super aggressive, crunchy midrange thats very British sounding.
I've read many accounts of the MC90 from users/ownwers, and having them in my 2 Thiele cabinets, sterile & characterless are not terms that I would use, nor has anyone else. I really dig them, personally.
some dude":3dqvime7 said:The MC90 descended from the G12-80.
The CL80 also descended from the G12-80.
They share a common tonal ancestor but are different speakers.
thegame":1q6vk9jo said:Both the MC90 and CL80 can sound 'pretty good' until you've heard an original G12-80, from which they're both derived. The oldies have all the superior definition of the former two (compared to most lower wattage Celestions) but instead of the somewhat sterile and characterless mids of the MC90/CL80, the old 80's have a super aggressive, crunchy midrange thats very British sounding.
danyeo":3uic5u3e said:thegame":3uic5u3e said:Both the MC90 and CL80 can sound 'pretty good' until you've heard an original G12-80, from which they're both derived. The oldies have all the superior definition of the former two (compared to most lower wattage Celestions) but instead of the somewhat sterile and characterless mids of the MC90/CL80, the old 80's have a super aggressive, crunchy midrange thats very British sounding.
I've owned old 80's CL80's and newer MC90's. I don't think the old one's are superior at all, just different. Also, chances are the CL80's that have a certain something that you like is because they've been played on for over 20 years.