My Verdict

  • Thread starter Thread starter lll
  • Start date Start date
lll
lll
Banned
Well-known member
The Derek Chauvin verdict is in (guilty).

Here's my verdict on the entire thing:

The world is rid of two pieces of shit (both Floyd & Chauvin), and a better place because of it.
 
I think you should pay it forward and eat a bullet lll.
 
I think you should pay it forward and eat a bullet lll.


Floyd had been sentenced to five years in prison in 2009 for aggravated assault stemming from a robbery where Floyd entered a woman’s home, pointed a gun at her stomach and searched the home for drugs and money, according to court records

Floyd along with another suspect posed as a worker for the local water department wearing a blue uniform in order to enter a woman’s house. When the woman retaliated a Ford Explorer pulled up to the home and five other males exited the car and went up to the front door.

The report states the largest of the group, who the victim later identified as Floyd, ‘forced his way inside the residence, placed a pistol against the complainant’s abdomen, and forced her into the living room area of the residence.
‘This large suspect then proceeded to search the residence while another armed suspect guarded the complainant, who was struck in the head and sides by this second armed suspect with his pistol while she screamed for help.’
Not finding any drugs or money at the house, the men took jewelry and the woman’s cell phone and fled in their car. A neighbor who witnessed the robbery took down the car’s license plate number.
Later, police tracked down the car and found Floyd behind the wheel. He was later identified by the woman as the large suspect who placed a gun against her stomach and forced her into her living room, the document states.


George-Floyd-pointing-a-gunat-a-womans-abdomen.jpg




They're both pieces of shit... who just so happened to cancel each other out.

Go cry to your momma, dumbshit.
 
Maybe.... Unless statements made this Saturday to incite violence if not convicted play into account. We'll see. Maybe grounds for a mistrial? Who knows.
 
The Derek Chauvin verdict is in (guilty).

Here's my verdict on the entire thing:

The world is rid of two pieces of shit (both Floyd & Chauvin), and a better place because of it.

I get your point, however thinking like this winds up bypassing the justice system as we take the law into our own hands. Tit for tat is no way to run a society.
I don't know whether Floyd was convicted for his crimes and did time, but this trial is about Chauvin's crimes.
 
I get your point, however thinking like this winds up bypassing the justice system as we take the law into our own hands. Tit for tat is no way to run a society.
I don't know whether Floyd was convicted for his crimes and did time, but this trial is about Chauvin's crimes.
Indeed. Kind of hard not to wonder if verdicts to this extent were the example of fear of repercussions from mob rule.
 
I get your point, however thinking like this winds up bypassing the justice system as we take the law into our own hands. Tit for tat is no way to run a society.
I don't know whether Floyd was convicted for his crimes and did time, but this trial is about Chauvin's crimes.

Nothing to do with tit-for-tat.

They are/were both pieces of shit... technically, they cancelled each other out.
 
Nothing to do with tit-for-tat.

They are/were both pieces of shit... technically, they cancelled each other out.
While I don't disagree to some extent, it's the coviction straight across the board that concerns me. Piece of shit or not, when you have a mob, including politicians of the highest level stirring the pot of tension and threats, was the verdict beyond a reasonble doubt and just? Or from fear of retaliation?
 
While I don't disagree to some extent, it's the coviction straight across the board that concerns me. Piece of shit or not, when you have a mob, including politicians of the highest level stirring the pot of tension and threats, was the verdict beyond a reasonble doubt and just? Or from fear of retaliation?


Regardless of all the political posturing, pot stirring and all the black racists screaming "that's rayyyycist!" -

Watch the vid - see testimony.

Zero reason to put a knee on someone's neck for 9 minutes.

AFAIC, they (Chauvin & Floyd) are both thugs. And thugs belong in the ground.

MM-FLOYD-MINN-COP.jpg
 
Regardless of all the political posturing, pot stirring and all the black racists screaming "that's rayyyycist!" -

Watch the vid - see testimony.

Zero reason to put a knee on someone's neck for 9 minutes.

AFAIC, they (Chauvin & Floyd) are both thugs. And thugs belong in the ground.

MM-FLOYD-MINN-COP.jpg
Eventually this day had to come. I somewhat agree with you lll. I don't think George Floyd deserves to be "in the ground" for passing a fake $20 bill and subsequently resisting arrest. There will come a day when police are taught that it is normal for people to resist arrest or flee the police when their adrenaline kicks in. Unless the police officer's life is in danger, this should not be met with lethal force.
 
Zero reason to put a knee on someone's neck for 9 minutes
I'll reserve that judgement for those that were actually there. Neck/Choke holds WERE an MPD approved use of force at the time of this incident. Is a knee on the neck for that amount of time too far? It certainly seems so. And for that matter does a knee on the neck fall within that policy? My first reaction when seeing the video was this department has a training issue and the fact that nobody called for EMS right away is an absolute dereliction of duty. Was Chauvin criminally culpable? For negligence at the very least. But the one thing that of course is always conveniently glossed over in this and many other incidents is the fact that there's lack of compliance from the subjects.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lll
Eventually this day had to come. I somewhat agree with you lll. I don't think George Floyd deserves to be "in the ground" for passing a fake $20 bill and subsequently resisting arrest. There will come a day when police are taught that it is normal for people to resist arrest or flee the police when their adrenaline kicks in. Unless the police officer's life is in danger, this should not be met with lethal force.
Your statement comes absolute ignorance. Not your fault, you just don't know.
 
You want me to prove you saying that I am wrong, wrong. How about you prove that I am wrong. Eh Chacho?
Ignorance: lack of knowledge or information. You're talking about law enforcement training and what they should and shouldn't do. How much of that training have YOU had?
 
Ignorance: lack of knowledge or information. You're talking about law enforcement training and what they should and shouldn't do. How much of that training have YOU had?
I asked for proof. I guess you don't know what that means.
 
 
Back
Top