New Rebel preamp tubes

  • Thread starter Thread starter jwdubois
  • Start date Start date
jwdubois

jwdubois

New member
I got some new preamp tubes in yesterday to try in my Rebel 20. After wading through various reviews describing tubes using wine tasting terms such as "silky", "full bodied", etc, I ended up buying a set of Tung Sol 12AX7's (including one with matched triodes for the phase inverter), and a pair of Jan Philips 5751's.

My ultimate goal is to achieve smoothness. Since I'm not a metal player, the 5751's were pointed out to me as a way to smooth things out, at the cost of some gain.

Question, is this an “official” document? It’s what I was going by ….
https://www.thegearpage.net/board/showth ... p?t=481854

First up, I replaced the stock GT 12AX7's in the Rebel with the Tung Sol set. I noticed an immediate difference. The Rebel seemed to have more available gain and seemed smoother at the same time. The low gain settings were much better, very punchy and Fender like.

Then I replaced V1 and V2 with the 5751's (I didn't buy a 5751 PI tube). While there was less available high gain, what there was very smooth and Marshall-y. The bass seemed a little tighter as well, I could go to the low E on my Strat on the front pickup without as much mud.

Results: I liked the Tung Sols better for low gain and the 5751's for high gain. This may seem backwards, but that was my first impression. We'll see how that stands up when I try it all again with fresh ears.

Newby questions:

While I was at it, I checked the power tube bias. According to my DVM, the EL84s were slightly hot and the 6V6s were spot on. I assume the tube bias current is:

(mv reading/ 1 ohm) / 2

so that the 45mv reading is actually 22.5mA per tube (not counting screen current?)?

There is a lot of information on the various benefits and drawbacks of different bias levels. As far as I can tell, most of the benefits of a “hot” bias have to do with improving the sound of the amp at high power levels, in particular, to prevent crossover distortion. Question: is there any benefit of a “hot” bias when you are primarily running clean? As in, I'm not really playing loud enough to get into the power tubes much.

JWW
 
First up, I replaced the stock GT 12AX7's in the Rebel
The GT 12AX7's in the Rebel are supposed to be JJ's (Ecc83's).If they're not GT's,they are Sovtek's.Mine came with the GT's (JJ) and,since i've got a few TungSol lying around (and a Jan/Phillips 5751),i'm interested by your test.At some point,i will try some tube swapping.. :D
 
Hmmmm, I was going by this quote from Jeff H:

The GT's were JJ's with the Gt logos only. We then stopped using GT because of their sale to Fender and the fact that the GT testing was not worth the cost in our minds. So they have always been JJ"s in the power section and were JJ's at first in the pre amp but are now Sovteks.

Now I'm not sure what the original tubes were. I thought they were Sovteks based on the above. I think they were labelled as GT's, but I think they were labelled 12AX7 and not ECC83. But if they were labelled GT the are JJ?

Anyway, there was not as big a difference between the stock set and the Tung Sols as there was between the stock set and the 5751's, which was to be expected because of the big gain difference. I was planning to run all my tests over anyway, probably several times, as I have a tendency to hear things differently from day to day.

Another test I am running at the same time is trying all these tubes in my Blackstar HT-DIST pedal. The 5751 seemed especially good in there as well.

JWW
 
Now I'm not sure what the original tubes were. I thought they were Sovteks based on the above. I think they were labelled as GT's, but I think they were labelled 12AX7 and not ECC83. But if they were labelled GT the are JJ?
Yeah,the pre-amp tubes with the GrooveTube label (GT) are JJ's.It's normal if they are labelled as 12AX7,but there are many kind of (JJ)12AX7's,and i think those are the Ecc83s .The power tubes (6V6 & EL84) are JJ's.It's funny because i also own a HT-Dual Blackstar...so,you think i should put a 5751 in there as well :lol: :LOL: ?
 
It might be worth giving it a listen. The lower gain structure makes the gain knob more linear. Full gain with the 5751 is like ~70% of the 12AX7, but it doesn't sound like just turning down the 12AX7. The 5751 seems to sound more Marshally or brown or whatever when fully cranked.

At least that was my first impression. I'll swap back and forth some more this weekend to make sure it wasn't just an illusion.

JWW
 
I am now holding one of my original Rebel 20 preamp tubes in my hand. It is marked:

GT
Egnater
GT12AX7R

Which is printed over:

Sovtek
12AX7WA
Made in Russia

So if Egnater thought they were getting JJ's from GT they were getting ripped off....

JWW
 
jwdubois":eheywdaq said:
I am now holding one of my original Rebel 20 preamp tubes in my hand. It is marked:

GT
Egnater
GT12AX7R

Which is printed over:

Sovtek
12AX7WA
Made in Russia

So if Egnater thought they were getting JJ's from GT they were getting ripped off....

JWW


If my memory serves me correctly. Guitar Center pushed Egnater to use JJ relabeled GT tubes at first, against Bruce's wishes. They had some issues at first w/ reliability with the JJ tubes, and now they are using GT Sovtek relabeled tubes, which have a MUCH BETTER reliability rate for Egnater stuff.

Eric
 
The power tubes are still JJ aren't they? I haven't pulled them to look. I'm still new to the tube world, but from what I have gleaned from the internet, I got the impression JJ's were considered decent quality tubes and Sovteks were cheap OEM stuff to be replaced at the earliest opportunity.

The Sovtek 12AX7WA is not a highly rated tube (sound-wise) at the on-line tube stores I checked, FWIW.

Anyway, the Tung Sols sound a little better to me in my Rebel.

JW
 
OK,i just looked at mine:it's the same as yours.GT12AX7R on one side and Sovtek 12AX7WA printed on the other.I did look at the Power tubes,it's only written GT EL34S & GT 6V6S (n°7 btw),nothing else,except Egnater...So,i put a JJ Ecc83S in V2 and...i play a few notes,then,i hear a "pops" and...nothing!No sound anymore :aww: The Led is still shining and i can hear the usual noise when i turn the Watt-knob (also if i crank the gain,Bzzzz) but nothing else :no: Is it characteristical of a dead pre-amp tube?I guess it's the new JJ 12AX7 but it's a real new one ,never used before... :( It was very late,so, i decided to wait until tomorrow... :confused: and ask here before anything ;)
 
viking22":2t3isqr6 said:
OK,i just looked at mine:it's the same as yours.GT12AX7R on one side and Sovtek 12AX7WA printed on the other.I did look at the Power tubes,it's only written GT EL34S & GT 6V6S (n°7 btw),nothing else,except Egnater...So,i put a JJ Ecc83S in V2 and...i play a few notes,then,i hear a "pops" and...nothing!No sound anymore :aww: The Led is still shining and i can hear the usual noise when i turn the Watt-knob (also if i crank the gain,Bzzzz) but nothing else :no: Is it characteristical of a dead pre-amp tube?I guess it's the new JJ 12AX7 but it's a real new one ,never used before... :( It was very late,so, i decided to wait until tomorrow... :confused: and ask here before anything ;)

Sounds like a bad preamp tube to me.

Eric
 
I have a new set of Rebel tubes on the way - can't wait to try them out. My Rebel is one of the early ones with all-JJ tubes.

Doug at Dougstubes recommended the following:

V1 Ruby 12AX7AC5
V2 Penta Labs 7025C
V3 (PI) Sovtek LP

6V6: Tung-Sol matched pair
EL-84: TAD EL-84 matched pair

I also ordered a separate Tung Sol 12AX7, just because of all the good reviews it has gotten - will try that out in all 3 positions. I'm after Fendery cleans and smooth distortion - not high gain or metal.

Retarius
 
I'm interested in your results. I went back and forth a few times before settling on the Tung Sols over the Jan Philips 5751s. What is the deal with the Penta Labs 7025C? I can't find any information on it, at Doug's or the Penta Labs website.

I will be curious to see what you think of the power tube swap. What sort of levels are you playing at?

Oh, and I assume you know this, but according to a diagram I saw, V1 and V2 are swapped in the Rebel.

JWW
 
Retarius quote: My Rebel is one of the early ones with all-JJ tubes.
Retarius,that's what i was told about my Rebel too..Since my effect-loop was also a pre-mod one,i thought it made sense...until i looked by myself (it has GT Sovtek 12AX7's) :no: .Have you looked at your pre-amp tubes yourself?Anyway,i'm not very lucky with this because i really wanted to hear the JJ 12AX7 and my brand new one is already dead :aww: If you do have the JJ 12AX7's,i would be even more interested in your results! Good luck! PS: JWW,are you still happy with the TS ?Better than the Sovtek ?It's not too agressive (no metallic edge/attack ?) sounding?
 
jwdubois":3i9bb7hj said:
I'm interested in your results. I went back and forth a few times before settling on the Tung Sols over the Jan Philips 5751s. What is the deal with the Penta Labs 7025C? I can't find any information on it, at Doug's or the Penta Labs website.

I will be curious to see what you think of the power tube swap. What sort of levels are you playing at?

Oh, and I assume you know this, but according to a diagram I saw, V1 and V2 are swapped in the Rebel.

JWW
Frankly, I don't know about the Penta Labs tubes, either - just what Doug recommended to me. I bought the Tung-Sol 12AX7 in case it gave me better results in V1-V3. Yeah - the V2 is located closer to the input jack - marked on the PCB.

Viking, I haven't removed the cans from the 12AX7's yet, so haven't actually verified they are indeed JJs - just going by what Bruce and Hilly said.

I'm not expecting a huge difference at low volumes or with power scaling at the low side. I am expecting a noticeable diff with it running more full out. We will see.

I saw a small box from Doug's Tubes in my wife's office today. Was hoping to pry out a couple of those babies while she was gone today and try 'em out, but the only way I could do that was by breaking the USPS special tape. D**n!!!! Wifester woul1d kill me if I broke into a birthday present early - then I could forget it next time a GAS attack strikes! :gethim:

Oh well, just have to "endure" the stock Rebel tones for a few days more!

Retarius
 
viking22":1e0dyhua said:
PS: JWW,are you still happy with the TS ?Better than the Sovtek ?It's not too agressive (no metallic edge/attack ?) sounding?
Two caveats. I'm not an experienced tube guy like many on this site. And I'm not a cranker. I'm talking about low volume applications.

That being said, yes, I'm pretty happy with the Tung Sols right now. It could have been lack of user knowledge, but I could never get an OD sound from the Rebel that I really liked with the stock tubes. With the Tung Sols, I can get the kind of Bonamassa like smooth chimey blues lead sounds that I have been looking for.

I have the treble and bass at ~12oc, and the mid at ~8oc. Bright and Tight are off. Gain ~1-3oc. I am running one Egnater 1x12. I have it set up across the room, and I always set a chair or a trash can or something in front of it to diffuse it. And I'm an older guy who probably has some upper frequency hearing loss. But no, given all the above, it's not harsh at all. It seems much less harsh than the Sovteks.

I suppose what I need to do is put the Sovteks back in and see whether there is a real difference or if it is just in my head, or the just the way I'm hearing things today.

The only problem is that now that I can get a good lead sound out of the Rebel, I've got a big jones for the two channel Rebel 30 head.

JWW
 
Retarius":3ncs5ylr said:
I have a new set of Rebel tubes on the way - can't wait to try them out. My Rebel is one of the early ones with all-JJ tubes.

Doug at Dougstubes recommended the following:

V1 Ruby 12AX7AC5
V2 Penta Labs 7025C
V3 (PI) Sovtek LP

6V6: Tung-Sol matched pair
EL-84: TAD EL-84 matched pair

I also ordered a separate Tung Sol 12AX7, just because of all the good reviews it has gotten - will try that out in all 3 positions. I'm after Fendery cleans and smooth distortion - not high gain or metal.

Retarius
Got my tubes today! Doug was out of the Tung-Sol 6V6s so ordered them from Toob store today,

1. Put in Ruby (V1), Penta (V2) and Tung-Sol (V3) first. Noticed right away more clean headroom, better definition, and smoother distortion than stock JJs (My original 12AX7's are Sovteks). Played around in several settings, but kept EQ flat (noon)

2. Took newbies out and put in original 12AX7s. Highs seemed more brittle and raspier - OK in some pickup settings but not so good in brighter settings and tone control up. OK, I remember that sound. Seems much more compressed sound at equivalent levels to #1.

3. Put new set in, but substituted new Sovtek LP for V3 (Phase inverter). Sounded close to #1 above, but #1 seemed ever so slightly better to me. I will play around with #3 for awhile, then probably go back to the Tung-Sol in V3.

4. Replaced the EL-84s with TAD matched set. MUCH better Vox-like cleans than JJs. I was able to get some crankage for a few minutes, and much prefered the cranked tones to the stock JJs - smoother, lower gain but awesome for the tones I like. Successful experiment!

Retarius
 
after a lot of testing-not in egnater-sovtek lps always sounds best in the pi.
Soon to be egnater owner
 
jwdubois":kr5y7jp9 said:
viking22":kr5y7jp9 said:
PS: JWW,are you still happy with the TS ?Better than the Sovtek ?It's not too agressive (no metallic edge/attack ?) sounding?
Two caveats. I'm not an experienced tube guy like many on this site. And I'm not a cranker. I'm talking about low volume applications.

That being said, yes, I'm pretty happy with the Tung Sols right now. It could have been lack of user knowledge, but I could never get an OD sound from the Rebel that I really liked with the stock tubes. With the Tung Sols, I can get the kind of Bonamassa like smooth chimey blues lead sounds that I have been looking for.

I have the treble and bass at ~12oc, and the mid at ~8oc. Bright and Tight are off. Gain ~1-3oc. I am running one Egnater 1x12. I have it set up across the room, and I always set a chair or a trash can or something in front of it to diffuse it. And I'm an older guy who probably has some upper frequency hearing loss. But no, given all the above, it's not harsh at all. It seems much less harsh than the Sovteks.

I suppose what I need to do is put the Sovteks back in and see whether there is a real difference or if it is just in my head, or the just the way I'm hearing things today.

The only problem is that now that I can get a good lead sound out of the Rebel, I've got a big jones for the two channel Rebel 30 head.

JWW
Thanks!Very good news :thumbsup: !If you found a nice sound with the TS's,don't mess with it ;) .Enjoy it !Maybe later,you'll feel like tweaking again but,right now, i wouldn't change a thing if i were you :) !It's not easy to find the right tube combo...I own a M&B Nomad55 and i once had to replace a GT12AX7M (Mullard re-issue).I couldn't find it and went for a full set (5) of TS12AX7's instead.The result was not good to my ears,though, and i still have these 5 brand new TS's!That's why i hope i'll like them,as much as you do, in the Rebel !Based on your description,i think i will...And,of course,i'm also waiting eagerly to try the Rebel30 and,even more,the Renegade :lol: :LOL: ! Retarius,congrats for the successful experiment :rock: !
 
Too many TS's is usually not a good result. Try one in V1 or somewhere in the circuit, but not all.
 
Buckeyedog":15tlht12 said:
Too many TS's is usually not a good result. Try one in V1 or somewhere in the circuit, but not all.
Yep,that's what i did with the M&B.Strangely enough,it did alter the sound (in a bad way) wherever i used one..but, with the Rebel,i hope it will be different.
 
Back
Top