suhr modern reverse headstock?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bailey12444
  • Start date Start date
B

bailey12444

New member
I just saw a video of peter gusmano playing his suhr modern with reverse headstock, and I think it looks really cool. So I just order my modern and I want to get a reverse headstock, but will it change the feel, or playability, or the sound?
 
Me, playing my Suhr Standard Skyblue Burst with a reversed maple headstock.. Aldrich in the bridge and FL in the neck.. :)
 

Attachments

  • 69099_1605521905388_1456374949_31562956_4778168_n.jpg
    69099_1605521905388_1456374949_31562956_4778168_n.jpg
    64 KB · Views: 3,435
Heres my standard.

Plus I have a modern on it's way with a reverse headstock.
 

Attachments

  • 012.JPG
    012.JPG
    113.8 KB · Views: 3,455
if it has a locking nut, there's no difference other than cosmetic, and practical (for tuning and string changes).

if you have a regular nut, there's definitely a difference! theoretically, the tension of the high unwound strings will decrease and increase for the low wound strings. but that is only according to length. the angle behind the nut also makes a difference for how effectively the string is terminated.

the playability is not improved imho, especially if you want to do behind the nut bends. but appearance wise it rules!

i play a reverse headstock standard with non locking 2-point trem as my #1 ...

.
 
Big difference to me. String tension changes the tone. Better? Worse? Objecive. I like both.
 
Hard&Heavy":1mkbn70s said:
Heres my standard.

Plus I have a modern on it's way with a reverse headstock.


I have played this guitar and it is incredibly sweet!!!!!!
 
Gets a bit confusing on a lefty. I just placed an order for a 3rd with a custom paint job, also reversed but it will have the Gotoh Floyd.

img0486s.jpg
 
Back
Top