The Diezel Schmidt has landed!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anonymous
  • Start date Start date
A

Anonymous

Guest
Those of you who have not had the privlege of trying this amp out yet, are in for some really eye-opening sound versatility, feeling, saturation clarity and versatility, amazing reverb quality, and one hypnotic experience.

I could not turn this amp off! It has so much of everything in one small, heavy (that's weight), Mercedes-like build quality package, and it is LOUD, when needed.

You guys are in for a real treat! :lol: :LOL: :thumbsup: :rock:
 
c'mon on Stephen, post the review you sent me my friend. I know lots of the folks here would benefit from such a finetune ear like yours :D

I know I have!
 
Hi Stephen,

seems you are liking this amp. Like Joey wrote: Could you please post your impressions in a review?
You would make us happy!!!

Cheers
ed
 
I will be glad to post my findings, but remember that we all hear things differently, so your results may vary. I will try to be honest and give the type of description I would want to read about.

To begin with, the amp is low standing height-wise, but deep, front-to-back, and built in true Diezel form, like a Mercedes. And it is very heavy! My guess is the trannies.

Channel switching on the amp is done via 3 of 4 spring-loaded mini toggles which do not have a 2 position setting. You simply touch one and the channel changes and the mini toggles come back to their original position. The other mini toggle turns the reverb on and off. Channel switching, using either the toggles on the head, or the included footswitch, are quiet and immediate.

The reverb is as lush and high quality as any I have used either on an outboard effect, or built into an amp. In the lower settings it starts off soundling as a room reverb. As the dial is turned up more, it takes on a hall reverb tone, then a cathedral type sound, with lots of air, just as blowing smoke eventually becomes invisible, the sound of the reverb acts the same way. At full up, it has a Fendery type dwell to it, but not as splashy sounding as a Fender has. It is there, but far more usable and more refined sounding, less out-of-control sounding, less noisy.

Channel one has a lot of flexibility. The bass from zero to about 10 o'clock comes from nothing at all to a normal balanced sounding bass. At about 12 o'clock, the bass starts to sound as though the "deep" dial on other Diezel amps has been turned up a bit. The bass starts moving the speaker and I can feel the wind a bit on my ankles as the bass gets more intense. This is all with usable frequencies. Nothing is wasted here or on any other dial. At 3 o'clock, you know you are getting thumped by the bass, but it sounds deeper, not muddy at all and not the least bit "blatty". It remains tight, focused and correct. It just gets deeper and more prominent.

The middle control can get you a Fendery tone when rolled back all the way and as it is turned up to about 10 o'clock, brings the guitar, (I am using an XOX Handle with 2 DiMarzio PAF Pro pickups) into an even response balance between the bass, mids and treble. Above that, the mids get more in-your-face and the amp sounds more like you are placing your face closer to the speaker. It lets you know it is there, staring back at your face. For 30 watts, you are definitley getting your 30 watts worth with this amp! You guys know, typical great dial versatility as on all other Diezel amps. :yes:

The treble has a terrific sweep as well, and I set mine to about 2 o'clock to balance out the bass, mids, and treble fairly evenly sounding to my ears. Above 2 o'clock it sounded to me as though a bright switch was engaged, as the treble became more enhanced, but not harsh, or shrill. There is no presence control on this amp, but you don't need one. By changing to say, a Fender type guitar, the amp will take on more of a Fender amp feel, tone and vibe to it. So, changing the guitar will help get you closer to a given tone you want from the amp. The amp responds beautifully to any guitar used with it, in typical Diezel fashion.

I got from channel one, a jazzy, full, archtop type of tone, all the way to a solid-body, thinner sounding tone. Tele players should love this amp! The EQ controls will really give a wide sweep of different tones and enhance a guitar to make the most of it.

On all channels, the feel of this amp is not as tight as the VH4, different from the slight give of the Herbert, and a tad more "vintagey" sounding then the Einstein, but not true all out 1950-through 1972 vintage. It has a chameleon-type ability to it and the feeling is what I called "natural feeling" It is not saggy, not spongy, not tight, not loose, but as Goldie Locks said when tasting the baby bear's porridge..."just right" :thumbsup: . That's the only way I can describe it. Sorry everyone. :aww:

Channel two takes on a Fendery, slighty saturated tone in the early gain position of that dial, with lower mid settings. Just a wee bit o' hair so to speak. As I brought up the gain, the saturation became stronger, but retained clarity and transparency all the way up the dial, even though it became typically Diezel ferrocious as more gain was applied. In the 11 to 1 o'clock-ish area of the channel two gain dial, I started getting saturation similar to a Vox AC-30 and Marshall JTM-45 depending on where I had the EQ set. Less mids gave me more Vox-like tones, and more mids brought out the Marshall vibe.

Please don't get me wrong here. I am not stating that this amp gave me an exact or emulated sound of these named amps, or any other amp, but it brought on that feeling from playing and hearing it. How you set your EQ and gain will offer different variations on a theme that reminded me of these other amps, as I played and tweaked the dials. You may hear different sounds that remind you of different amps, since we all hear things differently.

The reverb will drive you nuts here when added judiciously. You will feel that you don't need any other outboard toys for tone enhancement. It became hypnotic to sit there and play with the dials, as Terry mentioned in his description, posted on the Diezel site.

Using only my front pickup, I got clarity and sustain with edge that felt pleasing and defined, and with the reverb turned up just enough, I felt almost dizzy, much like one has vertigo, sitting in front of the speaker and just noodling around. The tones were 3-D sounding. As I turned up the blend control on my guitar to add the lead pickup equally to the neck pickup, the sweet, dweety tones were amazing and clear, not at all harsh, but really inspiring to play. The saturation was definitely there too! The guitar reacted very well with how hard or soft I picked. It also responded extremely well when I backed off my guitar's volume control, cleaning up beautifully. I was able to get a clear, sweet, saturated, singing, dripping tone similar to a blues player, or basic rock player. The amp had sustain, and crunch, but sounded deep, saturated, and transparent all at the same time. Adjusting the mids changed the way the amp came forward into the foreground, but it never took away the feeling the amp was giving me. I did not over-set to extremes on the dials, any tones I wanted. These were all within the middle ranges of the dials. But when I did turned the dials to full or off to hear the result, all the tones given up by the Schmidt were still easily useable.

All the way up on channel two gain, and I was in dimed plexi or early JCM 800 territory. Yet the amp did not get cloudy or so saturated that the note clarity or transparency was lost. It just got more intense. Plenty of saturation on tap, with great sustain, thrust, feedback potential and umph, yet still the clarity of the note was audible, even though the saturation was raging. I loved it! If the dial could have gone up any more, the tones would have started to get cloudy sounding. Right where the gain dial ends, it was glorious!

Channel three has no EQ controls. If I set the gain and volume on channel two and channel three to be similar in type and volume level, when I switched to channel three, the amp got just slightly darker, but not in a bad way at all, and it took on a more definite Marshallesque vibe to it. Channel two, as I had it set up, was closer to a Vox vibe with the mids just around 11 o'clock. After switching channels, I knew it was not the same amp with just more gain available. The gain also increased slightly but still stayed transparent until it was higher then 2 o'clock on the channel three gain dial. Once up in that area, it was all Diezel and nothing else, and the saturation came pouring out in bountiful amounts.

(I, personally, will never need that much saturation as it offered above 2 o'clock on channel three's gain dial. I'm sure, however, that most of you reading this will just love it! You'll be saying to yourself..."Oh yeah! This is a Diezel alright!" Some of you may even feel that you need more gain then is available from this amp. This is understandable for the heavier players used to the bigger Diezel VH4, Herbert, or Einstein, but the Schmidt takes foot toys very well to add more gain and saturation if you desire that. I would never need all the gain that this amp has on tap, but that is just me.)* see note at bottom

Those of you who like to chugga-chugga might want to add a foot toy to enhance the effect, but it was still a brutal sounding 30 watts to my ears. Think Einstein, channel one, mode 3, DEFINITELY! This amp has incredible versatility. It can be sweet and meek, or stand up and get right in your face, as if looking for a fight. You will be amazed at how much sustain, versatility, and of course, full on Diezel rage comes out of this 30 watt amp.

The amp has, on the back panel, the ability to tap into a loop for the entire amp in either series, or parallel, AND two other loops set up specifically to use channels 1 and 2, or 2 and 3 for those wishing to insert specific foot toys or effects into just those channels directly. The footswitch has the ability to turn on and off the loops as well.

Now, to let you know what speaker I was using, I got the 2x12 with Tone Tubby ceramic speakers, but had not opened that carton up, as it would have been too much in my small living area. So, I used a small Marshall model 1912 1x12 cab with a 150 watt, 8 ohm Celestion in it with a closed back and ported up front. This was the only 1x12 I have, and the amp still sounded unbelievable through it! When I get the chance and the room to use the Diezel hempcone 2x12, I can only guess how amazing it will sound.

With a 4x12 or two, this thing should be beautiful to hear in a club, where a 100 watt amp is just painful and so much overkill in many live playing situations. I'm sure that with just a 2x12, I can get more then enough power to make this amp rock hard and plenty loud. Remember, that the reason this amp was designed was to get more tone from tubes at a lower volume with great flexibility. If you are one of those people who use a VH4 or Herbert, as I used too, and still need that ultra fucking loudness, huge bass thump, and brutality for your music, you may look at the Schmidt as a warm-up amp used in the dressing room before going on stage, but it is still a brutal amp for only 30 watts, loud and mean when asked to be, ladies and gentlemen . Don't think that this amp cannot deliver the goods! It is just a different type of amp, not to be compared to any other amp Diezel makes. It is just as good as the other Diezels, but lower in wattage for it's intended purpose.
You can still bring the neighbors knocking, or calling the police for you to quiet down at home...easily.

But the amp can go almost anywhere, keep up with loud drummers when using larger cabs, and sound great at lower volumes. It will be great in recording situations, small to medium size clubs, and even large clubs, if you mic up on big stages, or use the Diezel compensated out, which is really terrific sounding.

I have gotten excited about every Diezel amp I received from the VH4 back in 2002, through the Herbert and Einstein, and now the Schmidt. Every amp has a use and place, and this amp will definitely fit into more playing situations and get more use then the larger Diezels for my needs at this time. Your situations may require the larger amps. When I was younger, I had to have the larger 100 watt plus amps, but as many of you know already, most commercial clubs where people go to dance and listen to commercial bands, want it quieter, stages with P.A. systems are more refined, and require amps to have less power and less volume. So ultimately, this amp will definitely be used quite a lot by me.

Peter should be seriously congradulated for his design of this amp and of course, for it's superb abilities. It truly delivers in every way on every channel.

Once again, it gives up Peter's (the "Master's) voice" in spades! :rock:

I hope this is detailed enough. I really tried to be honest, give explanations that were meaningful and offered some sort of idea how I perceived using this amp in my initial testing. Having been playing Diezel amps for about eight years, and having owned them all to this point, I feel that I can grasp the way the amp will work for me in my live and studio situations faster then playing it for a month before giving a review as if it was only my first Diezel experience.

And, it is Alizée approved!...REALLY! :lol: :LOL: :confused:
Stephen


*Note: It was rightfully pointed out to me that this amp cannot get the type, power, or amount of saturation to compare it to the larger Diezel lineup, which is absolutely true. I did not make myself clear enough on this point, so this review was altered to express that fact in clearer terms on 1/06/10, and again on 1/07/10.

However, for those comparing this amp to another amp of similar wattage, I believe you will find the saturation, power, tonal flexibility, and other features placed into this amp to be truly amazing, and useful for just about anything you need from an amp.
 
I agree with a lot of what you said about the schmidt (except for all your hyperbole). I played it side-by-side with a Herbert and a VH4, all through a Mesa Traditional 4x12 with Vintage 30's. It can get "heavy" on channel 3, but not THAT heavy. It's like a modern-voiced JCM800 with more gain and more compression. But, it can't get as heavy as the Herbert or VH4 (can't comment on the Einstein). It's definitely a great amp and I'd say its closest competition are amps such as the Bad Cat Hot Cat (i.e. sub 50 watters). It has great cleans and the reverb is really good (way better than my old Bad Cat's).
 
C-4":3ggh1hen said:
...

Peter should be seriously congradulated for his design of this amp and of course, for it's superb abilities. It truly delivers in every way on every channel.

...

+1

Thank you for the great review - I agree with it all the way.

A few points:
Those 30W are loud enough for any possible situation, I'm rehearsing with a loud band and the Schmidt does not have problems cutting through.

The Amp does take pedals without any problems. Before the Schmidt I was using Fender-Amps + Pedals and they fit perfect with the Schmidt's clean channel.

Anyone having the opportunity to play the amp: Dime the clean channel all the way - this might be the best crunchsound you ever heard!

I have a nice Deluxe Reverb here next to the Schmidt and you can get very close to it with the Schmidt - it's clean is as good, definitely!

Stephen - can you tell us more when you played it with the hempcone-cab? And of course, we all want some photos ;)

Uli
 
dude i wanna try that thing on some sessions,

hey papa diezel can you send your redneck buddy a loaner to make some clips with? :D

A Wood
 
C-4":2fqko0my said:
I will be glad to post my findings, but remember that we all hear things differently, so your results may vary. I will try to be honest and give the type of description I would want to read about.

To begin with, the amp is low standing height-wise, but deep, front-to-back, and built in true Diezel form, like a Mercedes. And is it very heavy! My guess is the trannies.

Channel switching on the amp is done via 3 of 4 spring-loaded mini toggles which do not have a 2 position setting. You simply touch one and the channel changes and the mini toggles come back to their original position. The other mini toggle turns the reverb on and off. Channel switching, using either the toggles on the head, or the included footswitch, are quiet and immediate.

The reverb is as lush and high quality as any I have used either on an outboard effect, or built into an amp. In the lower settings it starts off soundling as a room reverb. As the dial is turned up more, it takes on a hall reverb tone, then a cathedral type sound, with lots of air, just as blowing smoke eventually becomes invisible, the sound of the reverb acts the same way. At full up, it has a Fendery type dwell to it, but not as splashy sounding as a Fender has. It is there, but far more usable and more refined sounding, less out-of-control sounding, less noisy.

Channel one has a lot of flexibility. The bass from zero to about 10 o'clock comes from nothing at all to a normal balanced sounding bass. At about 12 o'clock, the bass starts to sound as though the "deep" dial on other Diezel amps has been turned up a bit. The bass starts moving the speaker and I can feel the wind a bit on my ankles as the bass gets more intense. This is all with usable frequencies. Nothing is wasted here or on any other dial. At 3 o'clock, you know you are getting thumped by the bass, but it sounds deeper, not muddy at all and not the least bit "blatty". It remains tight, focused and correct. It just gets deeper and more prominent.

The middle control can get you a Fendery tone when rolled back all the way and as it is turned up to about 10 o'clock, brings the guitar, (I am using an XOX Handle with 2 DiMarzio PAF Pro pickups) into an even response balance between the bass, mids and treble. Above that, the mids get more in-your-face and the amp sounds more like you are placing your face closer to the speaker. It lets you know it is there, staring back at your face. For 30 watts, you are definitley getting your 30 watts worth with this amp! You guys know, typical great dial versatility as on all other Diezel amps. :yes:

The treble has a terrific sweep as well, and I set mine to about 2 o'clock to balance out the bass, mids, and treble fairly evenly sounding to my ears. Above 2 o'clock it sounded to me as though a bright switch was engaged, as the treble became more enhanced, but not harsh, or shrill. There is no presence control on this amp, but you don't need one. By changing to say, a Fender type guitar, the amp will take on more of a Fender amp feel, tone and vibe to it. So, changing the guitar will help get you closer to a given tone you want from the amp. The amp responsed beautifully to any guitar used with it, in typical Diezel fashion.

I got from channel one, a jazzy, full, archtop type of tone, all the way to a more solid-body, thinner sounding tone. Tele players should love this amp! The EQ controls will really give a wide sweep of different tones and enhance a guitar to make the most of it.

On all channels, the feel of this amp is not as tight as the VH4, different from the slight give of the Herbert, and a tad more vintagey sounding then the Einstein, but not true all out 1955-through 1972 vintage. It has a chameleon-type ability to it and the feeling is what I called "natural feeling" It is not saggy, not spongy, not tight, not loose, but as Goldie Locks said when tasting the baby bear's porridge...just right. That's the only way I can describe it. Sorry everyone. :aww:

Channel two takes on a Fender slighty saturated tone in the early gain position of that dial, with lower mid settings. Just a wee bit o' hair so to speak. As I brought up the gain, the saturation became stronger, but retained clarity and transparency all the way up the dial, even though it became typically Diezel ferrocious. In the 11 to 1 o'clock-ish area of the channel two gain dial, I started getting saturation similar to a Vox AC-30 and Marshall JTM-45 depending on where I had the EQ set. Less mids gave up more Vox and more mids brought out the Marshall vibe.

Please don't get me wrong here. I am not stating that this amp gave me an exact or emulated sound of these named amps, or any other amp, but it brought on that feeling from playing and hearing it. How you set your EQ and gain will offer different variations on a theme that reminded me of these other amps, as I played and tweaked the dials. You may hear different sounds that remind you of different amps. We all hear differently.

The reverb will drive you nuts here when added judiciously. You will feel that you don't need any other outboard toys for tone enhancement. It became hypnotic to sit there and play with the dials, as Terry mentioned in his description, posted on the Diezel site.

Using only my front pickup, I got clarity and sustain with edge that felt pleasing and defined, and with the reverb turned up just enough, I felt almost dizzy, much like I had vertigo, sitting in front of the speaker and just noodling around. The tones were 3-D sounding. As I turned up my blend control on my guitar to add the lead pickup equally to the neck pickup, the sweet, dweety tones were amazing and clear, not at all harsh, but really inspiring to play. The saturation was definitely there too! The guitar reacted very well with how hard or soft I picked. I got a clear, sweet, saturated, dripping tone similar to a blues player. The amp had sustain, a bit of crunch, but sounded deep, and transparent all at the same time. Adjusting the mids changed the way the amp came forward into the foreground, but it never took away the feeling the amp was giving me. I did not over set to extremes on the dials, any tones I wanted. These were all within the middle ranges of the dials, but when I did turn the dials to full or off to hear the result, all the tones given up by the Schmidt were still easily useable.

All the way up on the gain, and I was in dimed plexi or early JCM 800 territory. Yet the amp did not get cloudy or so saturated that the clarity or transparency was lost. It just got more intense. Plenty of saturation on tap, with great sustain, thrust, feedback potential and umph, yet still the clarity of the note was audible, even though the saturation was raging. I loved it! If the dial could have gone up any more, the tones would have started to get cloudy sounding. Right where the gain dial ends, it was glorious!

Channel three has no EQ controls. If I set the gain and volume on channel two and channel three to be similar in type and volume level, when I switched to channel three, the amp got just slightly darker, but not in a bad way at all, and it took on a more definite Marshallesque vibe to it. Channel two, as I had it set up, was closer to a Vox vibe with the mids just around 11 o'clock, and after switching channels, I knew it was not the same amp with just more gain available. The gain also increased slightly but still stayed transparent until it was higher then 2 o'clock on the channel three gain dial. Once up in that area, it was all Diezel and nothing else. And it came pouring out in bountiful amounts. I, personally, will never need that much saturation as it offered above 2 o'clock on channel three's gain dial. I'm sure, however, that most of you reading this will just love it! You'll be saying to yourself..."Oh yeah! This is a Diezel alright!"

Those of you who like to chugga-chugga might want to add a foot toy to enhance the effect, but it was still brutal sounding. Think Einstein, channel one, mode 3, DEFINITELY! This amp has incredible versatility and can lean back, as one might do in a chair up against a wall, or stand up and get right in your face, as if looking for a fight. You will be amazed at how much sustain, versatility, and of course, full on Diezel rage comes out of this 30 watt amp. Remember, this amp is only 30 watts. You may find yourself thinking it is more then 30 watt.

Now, to let you know what speaker I was using, I got the 2x12 with Tone Tubby ceramic speakers, but had not opened that carton up, as it would have been too much in my small living area. So, I used a small Marshall model 1912 1x12 cab with a 150 watt 8 ohm Celestion in it with a closed back and ported up front. This was the only 1x12 I have, and the amp still sounded unbelievable through it! When I get the chance and the room to use the Diezel hempcone 2x12, I can only guess how amazing it will sound.

With a 4x12 or two, this thing should be beautiful to hear in a club, where a 100 watt amp is just painful and so much overkill. I'm sure that with just a 2x12, I can get more then enough power to make this amp rock hard and plenty loud. Remember, that the reason this amp was designed was to get more tone from tubes at a lower volume with great flexibility. If you who use a VH4 or Herbert, as I used too, still need that ultra fucking loudness and brutality for your music, you may look at the Schmidt as a warm-up amp used in the dressing room before going on stage, but it is still LOUD, ladies and gentlemen . Don't think that this amp cannot deliver the goods!
You can still bring the neighbors a knocking or calling the police for you to quiet down at home...easily.

But the amp can go almost anywhere, keep up with loud drummers when using larger cabs, and sound great at lower volumes, such as recording situations, small to medium size clubs, and even large clubs, if you mic up on big stages, or use the Diezel compensated out, which is really terrific sounding.

I have gotten excited about every Diezel amp I received from the VH4 back in 2002, through the Herbert and Einstein, and now the Schmidt. Every amp has a use and place, and this amp will definitely fit in more playing situations and get more use then the larger Diezels for my needs at this time. Your situations may require the larger amps. When I was younger, I had to have the larger 100 watt plus amps, but as many of you know already, clubs want it quieter, stages with P.A. systems are more refined, and require amps to have less power and less volume. So ultimately, this amp will definitely be used quite a lot by me.

Peter should be seriously congradulated for his design of this amp and of course, for it's superb abilities. It truly delivers in every way on every channel.

Once again, it gives up Peter's (the "Master's) voice" in spades! :rock:

I hope this is detailed enough. I really tried to be honest, give explanations that were meaningful and offered some sort of idea how I perceived using this amp in my initial testing. Having been playing Diezel amps for about eight years, and having owned them all to this point, I feel that I can grasp the way the amp will work for me in my live situations faster then playing it for a month before giving a review as if it was only my first Diezel experience.

And, it is Alizée approved!...REALLY! :lol: :LOL: :confused:
Stephen
Review of the decade.
 
FourT6and2":2bi7u5oa said:
I agree with a lot of what you said about the schmidt (except for all your hyperbole). I played it side-by-side with a Herbert and a VH4, all through a Mesa Traditional 4x12 with Vintage 30's. It can get "heavy" on channel 3, but not THAT heavy. It's like a modern-voiced JCM800 with more gain and more compression. But, it can't get as heavy as the Herbert or VH4 (can't comment on the Einstein). It's definitely a great amp and I'd say its closest competition are amps such as the Bad Cat Hot Cat (i.e. sub 50 watters). It has great cleans and the reverb is really good (way better than my old Bad Cat's).

I agree with you about not being as heavy as the VH4 and Herbert. :thumbsup:
I never used my VH4 or Herbert for "heavy" music. I got out of both amps what I wanted, however, easily.

As I mentioned, some people will hear things differently. What is way too much saturation for my needs may possibly not be nearly enough for someone else's needs, and therefore, as I heard the amp, it has more saturation then I can use. I believe that I also mentioned that some players may want to add a foot toy to enhance the saturation of the amp.

I was only using hyperbole to paint a better picture of what I was describing, since no two people will interpret a description of tone the same way. I do apologize for my lack of ability to better describe the amp in regular terms. I do need to have a better ability to express myself more correctly and will try to work on this aspect.
Stephen

As for pictures, or clips, I do truly apologize, but I have no camera nor recording gear, and the only computer I have access too is at work. However, when I do get to try out the Diezel 2x12 with the Schmidt, I will report on it.

As for doing clips, I am quite sure that others, such as Andy Wood, Olaf, and others here will be so far more qualified to present the amp in it's best performing ways. :rock:
 
C-4":jp4jvkx4 said:
FourT6and2":jp4jvkx4 said:
I agree with a lot of what you said about the schmidt (except for all your hyperbole). I played it side-by-side with a Herbert and a VH4, all through a Mesa Traditional 4x12 with Vintage 30's. It can get "heavy" on channel 3, but not THAT heavy. It's like a modern-voiced JCM800 with more gain and more compression. But, it can't get as heavy as the Herbert or VH4 (can't comment on the Einstein). It's definitely a great amp and I'd say its closest competition are amps such as the Bad Cat Hot Cat (i.e. sub 50 watters). It has great cleans and the reverb is really good (way better than my old Bad Cat's).

I was only using hyperbole to paint a better picture of what I was describing, since no two people will interpret a description of tone the same way. I do apologize for my lack of ability to better describe the amp in regular terms. I do need to have a better ability to express myself more correctly and will try to work on this aspect.
Stephen:rock:

I wasn't trying to insult you. :)
 
FourT6and2":1lgg06ij said:
C-4":1lgg06ij said:
FourT6and2":1lgg06ij said:
I agree with a lot of what you said about the schmidt (except for all your hyperbole). I played it side-by-side with a Herbert and a VH4, all through a Mesa Traditional 4x12 with Vintage 30's. It can get "heavy" on channel 3, but not THAT heavy. It's like a modern-voiced JCM800 with more gain and more compression. But, it can't get as heavy as the Herbert or VH4 (can't comment on the Einstein). It's definitely a great amp and I'd say its closest competition are amps such as the Bad Cat Hot Cat (i.e. sub 50 watters). It has great cleans and the reverb is really good (way better than my old Bad Cat's).

I was only using hyperbole to paint a better picture of what I was describing, since no two people will interpret a description of tone the same way. I do apologize for my lack of ability to better describe the amp in regular terms. I do need to have a better ability to express myself more correctly and will try to work on this aspect.
Stephen:rock:

I wasn't trying to insult you. :)

I never took it to be an insult...really :)
I believe you have just pointed out in your initial post that I might have not explained myself clearly enough, and I appreciate you pointing that out. That's all.
To that end, I went back and re-wrote some of the explanation concerning the points you have made that I did not clearly enough explain and I thank you. :)
I do appreciate your input. :thumbsup:
 
C-4":26wlmhb4 said:
FourT6and2":26wlmhb4 said:
C-4":26wlmhb4 said:
FourT6and2":26wlmhb4 said:
I agree with a lot of what you said about the schmidt (except for all your hyperbole). I played it side-by-side with a Herbert and a VH4, all through a Mesa Traditional 4x12 with Vintage 30's. It can get "heavy" on channel 3, but not THAT heavy. It's like a modern-voiced JCM800 with more gain and more compression. But, it can't get as heavy as the Herbert or VH4 (can't comment on the Einstein). It's definitely a great amp and I'd say its closest competition are amps such as the Bad Cat Hot Cat (i.e. sub 50 watters). It has great cleans and the reverb is really good (way better than my old Bad Cat's).

I was only using hyperbole to paint a better picture of what I was describing, since no two people will interpret a description of tone the same way. I do apologize for my lack of ability to better describe the amp in regular terms. I do need to have a better ability to express myself more correctly and will try to work on this aspect.
Stephen:rock:

I wasn't trying to insult you. :)

I never took it to be an insult...really :)
I believe you have just pointed out in your initial post that I might have not explained myself clearly enough, and I appreciate you pointing that out. That's all.
To that end, I went back and re-wrote some of the explanation concerning the points you have made that I did not clearly enough explain and I thank you. :)
I do appreciate your input. :thumbsup:

I see where you made the edits. Reads much better now and I understand where you are coming from. :)
 
The You Tube clip I found of the Schmidt sounded awesome, so I can only imagine what it's like in person. This is by far my favourite sounding Diezel (*to date), The Einstein is a close second. I'm crossing my fingers that the mrs lets me guy another amp this year, it would be a shoot out between the Schmidt and the Einstein.
 
Thanks, Stephen,

you make me wanting one. I have to see Peter coming month!

Cheers
ed
 
Ed,
I am not aware of what type of music you play, but you are going to go crazy for this amp!
Because it is only 30 watts, the tubes can be pushed harder, which is the way to get the most out of them. However, I personally have not heard any other commercially produced 30 watt amp sound as loud, sweet, brutal, or anything in between those tonal descriptions, and have the other options that the Schmidt has to offer.

Some other lower wattage amps may have other features not found on the Schmidt, but this amp's functionabilities are totally useful. No wasted stuff or "fluff"-type options needed here.
Stephen
 
van hellion":21vtfrgp said:
dude i wanna try that thing on some sessions,

hey papa diezel can you send your redneck buddy a loaner to make some clips with? :D

A Wood

Give me a shout. :thumbsup:
 
And also a very nice review Stephen. I am glad you like your amp and it is meeting your musical needs. :thumbsup:
 
van hellion":21vlq1ut said:
dude i wanna try that thing on some sessions,

hey papa diezel can you send your redneck buddy a loaner to make some clips with? :D

A Wood

First check it at the NAMM, Darling :D
 
Back
Top