Peter Diezel":3k5wvmt3 said:
If the design don´t exceed the maximum ratings,
a vacuum tube should have a life span of 5000 to
10000 hours at least. This has nothing to do with
the performance which will decrease after 2000
to 3000 hours. And we are talking about high
quality tubes of course.
I've been asking myself that question, too (How long between changing tubes?). Especially if you're not using an amp hardcore every day, it's kind of hard to keep track of the hours. What I get from that info is basically that changing tubes yearly doesn't make sense unless you are a touring musician or spend many hours in the studio. To use up 3000 hours of tube life in a year, you'd have to play more than eight hours every day!
Also, but this is based on personal experience, I don't know how much voodoo is behind the amp starting to sound awesome after replacing tubes. Maybe it's partially the subconcious telling you it sounds way better with those new shiny and expensive tubes. Anyway it didn't seem to work on me. A couple of years ago, when I was visiting friends in St. Petersburg, Russia, I had the chance to buy a matched quad of =C= 6L6GC directly from the Svetlana factory. I was so excited! After coming back home, I swapped the tubes in my main amp by that time (Hughes & Kettner Triamp Mk1), it still had the stock tubes in it (years old and heavily used) putting in those =C= 's. I was kind of disappointed but I didn't hear any difference.
My question is if those 2000-3000 hours are valid even if my main amp gets played an hour a day on average (actually like 4-5 hours on one day a week). I'd get close to those 3000 hours after, what, like 8 years? So changing power tubes earlier is nonsense?
Greetings,
Till