Eva speaks truth

Fantastic speech and it applies to Australia 100% too. I don't agree with the Ukraine comments because I think that's stopping an autocratic nation from invading another nation and expanding. To not stop Russia emboldens them and they will continue to white ant the rest of their neighbours like "The Blob". Not doing so is a policy of appeasement but everything else is sounds right to me.
 
Last edited:
Thumbpicker said:
Given she styles herself as the "shieldmaiden of the far right" are you still sure I'm a neocon @VonBonfire.
Click to expand...
I generally see you as a neo con, no offense Pro big gov, pro Ukraine, pro vax. You're also anti gun, which is kind of weird but is still neo-con politics cause even though most neocons don't openly advocate for gun control since it ain't popular with the constituency, most of them go along with it.
 
VonBonfire said:
I generally see you as a neo con, no offense Pro big gov, pro Ukraine, pro vax. You're also anti gun, which is kind of weird but is still neo-con politics cause even though most neocons don't openly advocate for gun control since it ain't popular with the constituency, most of them go along with it.
Click to expand...
So at least he’s a neo con with integrity. 🤷‍♂️
 
VonBonfire said:
I generally see you as a neo con, no offense Pro big gov, pro Ukraine, pro vax. You're also anti gun, which is kind of weird but is still neo-con politics cause even though most neocons don't openly advocate for gun control since it ain't popular with the constituency, most of them go along with it.
Click to expand...
Well no - I'm not really pro "big Government" at all. The vaccination issue is a public health issue and I don't think the government or politics should be involved at all. I'm not actually completely anti-gun either. I do think guns should be regulated heavily though. I prefer to live here where they aren't a problem.

I am anti government when it comes to nanny state regulations on roads and curbs on free speech. I'm anti government when it comes to mass immigration and their support for multiculturalism. I'm anti-Government when it comes to surveilling and controlling our movements and interactions unless there evidence that there is some sort of reasonable suspicions of intent to commit an act of terrorism or something. Then surveil away as far as I'm concerned. Although most of the problems with that have been imported by the Government due to their mass immigration. As the lady in the video says it never used to be a problem before immigration that is. I'm anti-government when it comes to wholesale socialistic policies especially when it comes to equalising people that may not have put in any effort. I acknowledge that for some people there needs to be a bit of a safety net - but not when it comes to supporting a huge proportion of the population because they don't feel like working and only want a free ride. I support the free market and to a large extent user pays - except for certain services that require subsidisation because the free market can't supply them economically within bounds. That traditionally was part of the role of Governments.
 
Last edited:
Hey all,

I think this young lady is right concerning mass immigration. Former German Chancellor Angela Merkel should get life in prison for inviting the refugees from the middle east into Europe. Fucking ridiculous. The cultures and mindsets ARE NOT COMPATIBLE. NO consideration for the citizens already living there but roll out the red carpet for millions of migrants. FUCK THAT AND FUCK ISLAM, TOO.

My mother's cousin was killed when a drunk Mexican illegal smashed into his car. Just T-boned him. The drunk fucker tried to run away.

I disagree with her on Ukraine and I don't agree with the "Putting on the armor of God" rhetoric, because that can lead to theocratic movements.

I'm a political orphan. I agree with left on some issues, the right on others. That's OK by me.

I hope y'all are doing well.
 
Last edited:
JohnnyGtar said:
Hey all,

I think this young lady is right concerning mass immigration. Former German Chancellor Angela Merkel should get life in prison for inviting the refugees from the middle east into Europe. Fucking ridiculous. The cultures and mindsets ARE NOT COMPATIBLE. NO consideration for the citizens already living there but roll out the red carpet for millions of migrants. FUCK THAT AND FUCK ISLAM, TOO.

My mother's cousin was killed when a drunk Mexican illegal smashed into his car. Just T-boned him. The drunk fucker tried to run away.

I disagree with her on Ukraine and I don't agree with the "Putting on the armor of God" rhetoric, because that can lead to theocratic movements.

I'm in a political orphan. I agree with left on some issues, the right on others. That's OK by me.

I hope y'all are doing well.
Click to expand...
I agree with that. The "full armour of God" bit was wrong too and I should have added that to my comments. Obviously, a Christian wouldn't want to promote factors in their culture that lead to the spread of Islam. At the same time, the Bible talks about welcoming strangers to your land. Take the book of Ruth for example. I'm not sure the Bible advocates incompatible cultures however for the reason I just said. It's a bit grey there imo. The Bible certainly talks about different nations as distinct from each other. It doesn't imo talk much about advocating a melting pot. However we are to proclaim the gospel to all nations. To say that means bring all nations to your own country and become a melting pot is a bit of stretch imo. One thing is for sure, the Bible says people from all nations are your Christian brother and sisters. The tower of Babel was in the Old Testament... The point of the new covenant was to bring salvation to everyone - all nations.

Anyway I don't think she shouldn't have claimed she has Biblical support for her position because it's not clear. Mixing incompatible cultures through multiculturalism she might be on stronger ground but I wouldn't say it's totally clear to me what God's position is on it... Another Biblical position is God is in control and everything is part of his plan. So make of that what you will.
 
Thumbpicker said:
I agree with that. The "full armour of God" bit was wrong too and I should have added that to my comments. Obviously, a Christian wouldn't want to promote factors in their culture that lead to the spread of Islam. At the same time, the Bible talks about welcoming strangers to your land. Take the book of Ruth for example. I'm not sure the Bible advocates incompatible cultures however for the reason I just said. It's a bit grey there imo. The Bible certainly talks about different nations as distinct from each other. It doesn't imo talk much about advocating a melting pot. However we are to proclaim the gospel to all nations. To say that means bring all nations to your own country and become a melting pot is a bit of stretch imo. One thing is for sure, the Bible says people from all nations are your Christian brother and sisters. The tower of Babel was in the Old Testament... The point of the new covenant was to bring salvation to everyone - all nations.

Anyway I don't think she shouldn't have claimed she has Biblical support for her position because it's not clear. Mixing incompatible cultures through multiculturalism she might be on stronger ground but I wouldn't say it's totally clear to me what God's position is on it... Another Biblical position is God is in control and everything is part of his plan. So make of that what you will.
Click to expand...

Excellent post. Thank you. What I wrote before was a clumsy attempt to say that I don't want any government dictating religious beliefs. I do readily recognize the role of Christianity in shaping western civilization but my beliefs are my own and that's an area of our lives that no government has any business telling us how we must live, act, think or believe. Have a good one!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top