I'd say with the agenda press you are ending up less informed and believing what the politicians want you to believe...the press works for one side....it's not about D/R.....it's about the uniparty vs the folks....it's a big club, and we ain't in it. They've earned that distrust.....I get my news from independent news and make up my own damn mind.....bias confirmation isn't getting "informed"
It's so true, the mainstream media has its own agenda to push, like the NYTimes. They have an anti-Trump slant and it's visible.
That said. there's a difference between getting your information from a reliable source and just swallowing up everything that they spout out. It's important to make inferences from the news from multiple sources.
I wouldn't rely too much on independent news agencies to inform me. They've usually got an agenda to push as well. Follow the money and it will surprise you who is backing an organisation.
Like out here in India, where the politicians have stakes in every newspaper and TV news channel. The ones that attempt to be independent find out they get little in the way of funding from ads or grants that come without strings attached.
Still, there's good information in there. That's why it's important to have as many sources of news as possible and digest information from all those sources.
You'd be missing out on a whole lot of good reporting if you don't read the NYTimes, as an example of playing the devil's advocate.
Of course, nowadays, people want to read what they believe, rather than anything based on facts. Lord forbid your paper of choice should bash Trump, or Biden, or Harris, or whoever.
Basically the masses have been dumbed down already and the politicians win.
Not sure if you'd see it that way though.