Our Prez
- Thread starter Pepi
- Start date
again with this
New member
Rushtallica
New member
Rushtallica
New member
MitchSchaft
New member
I can't wait til he leaves. I'm sorry I voted for him the second time. But considering the alternative...
again with this
New member
shredhead666
New member
Gainzilla
Well-known member
>|<>QBB<
Im not sure what gets me Angrier Mitch; The fact that I voted for him twice or that fact that the Democrats couldnt find one person to beat him..
Its amazing how much shit they sling at him( deservedly so) but what does that say about them that they couldnt find one person to be arguebly one of the worst presidents in history?
MitchSchaft":3f3ec said:
Im not sure what gets me Angrier Mitch; The fact that I voted for him twice or that fact that the Democrats couldnt find one person to beat him..
Its amazing how much shit they sling at him( deservedly so) but what does that say about them that they couldnt find one person to be arguebly one of the worst presidents in history?
Digital Jams
New member
>|<>QBB<
Me too, how the hell did the Dems NOT find someone that could have beat him??? The office was theirs to take and they threw one of the biggest stuffed shirts out there :?
Chris Dodd just announced he is running......ugh the second biggest lush in the Senate next to Fat Ted
STEEL KAGE":63499 said:
Me too, how the hell did the Dems NOT find someone that could have beat him??? The office was theirs to take and they threw one of the biggest stuffed shirts out there :?
Chris Dodd just announced he is running......ugh the second biggest lush in the Senate next to Fat Ted
shredhead666
New member
>|<>QBB<
Abso-FRIGGIN'-lutely. Spot on.
Hell I would have voted for Wes Clark if the democrats didn't stonewall him. I think many of the more right-leaning swing voters would have done the same. Damn, I hope Wes Clark runs THIS year. I might vote for him anyway depending on who the other candidates are.
STEEL KAGE":cf1f5 said:
Abso-FRIGGIN'-lutely. Spot on.
Hell I would have voted for Wes Clark if the democrats didn't stonewall him. I think many of the more right-leaning swing voters would have done the same. Damn, I hope Wes Clark runs THIS year. I might vote for him anyway depending on who the other candidates are.
Jeff Hilligan
Well-known member
Look at history..the Democrats like to loose! Vietnam, elections and now Iraq! Cause they dont know how to win!
Variable
Active member
>|<>QBB<
Personally I would've put my money on General Clark if he hadn't been nixed in the primary. I think he had the best credentials to take the Dems to the presidency and to fix this pointless Iraq war. But having that Heinz fortune behind you makes it easy to buy up primary votes
Or course, IMHO a bowl of Jello would do a better job than Chimpy McBush at this point.
Digital Jams":59a90 said:>|<>QBB<
Me too, how the hell did the Dems NOT find someone that could have beat him??? The office was theirs to take and they threw one of the biggest stuffed shirts out there :?
Chris Dodd just announced he is running......ugh the second biggest lush in the Senate next to Fat Ted
Personally I would've put my money on General Clark if he hadn't been nixed in the primary. I think he had the best credentials to take the Dems to the presidency and to fix this pointless Iraq war. But having that Heinz fortune behind you makes it easy to buy up primary votes
Or course, IMHO a bowl of Jello would do a better job than Chimpy McBush at this point.
flying_high
New member
after bush it's most likely a sure win for the democrats. maybe this is thier strategy?
Variable
Active member
>|<>QBB<
Well, what's really interesting is that the roles seem to have switched between the Dems and Pubies; if you remember the 2004 race, the Dems were very disorganized, which ultimately led to them losing the races. However, if you look at the election last November, we saw a unity not unlike the unity of the Republican front in the 90s when they took back Congress. Now you look at the Republican party and its exhibiting many of the flaws the Dems were showing for the past six years, such as division over the Iraq war, stem cell research, etc. There also don't seem to be any appealing candidates for the 2008 presidential election; McCain seems to be a front runner, but his undying support of the Iraq war will only hurt him considering the majority of Americans are for pulling out.
STEEL KAGE":0c315 said:
Well, what's really interesting is that the roles seem to have switched between the Dems and Pubies; if you remember the 2004 race, the Dems were very disorganized, which ultimately led to them losing the races. However, if you look at the election last November, we saw a unity not unlike the unity of the Republican front in the 90s when they took back Congress. Now you look at the Republican party and its exhibiting many of the flaws the Dems were showing for the past six years, such as division over the Iraq war, stem cell research, etc. There also don't seem to be any appealing candidates for the 2008 presidential election; McCain seems to be a front runner, but his undying support of the Iraq war will only hurt him considering the majority of Americans are for pulling out.