ok, so I'm envious.Saw this tour in a club in Boston from up real close.
ok, so I'm envious.
I officially dig RT more than other forums now.See how Jimmy puts the Les Paul right over his balls? That’s where the tone comes from, it’s the tone zone
View attachment 199312
Fingers= Pronouncing.Style comes from the fingers, not tone.
Yeah I’ve seen too many horrible players make great rigs sound like shit and too many great players make shitty rigs sound fantastic not to believe some of itAll joking aside, I believe in some of the "tone is in the fingers" idea, but not always to the extreme.
I gotta admit, when I first glanced at the post I thought it said- "Tone is fingers in my ass".............I can tell you haven't been on this forum long because us old timers wouldn't have put the words "Fingers" and "My Ass" so close together in a post title, because it is like sharks to blood...
All joking aside, I believe in some of the "tone is in the fingers" idea, but not always to the extreme.
Sorry but as much of a gear whore as I am, I cannot contest the fact that touch, technique, phrasing, etc. have a heck of a lit to do with tone. I've heard lousy players make the best amps sound bad, and have heard good players make cheap gear sound good. I hate having an incredible amp that can't express itself because of bad technique. Even between guys that just strum chords and play thythm, there's a massive difference in tone between good players and lousy ones.Does this phrase bother anyone else?
I broached this topic on another online forum and was surprised at the response.
* * * *
I gotta get this off my chest. Lemme get on the soap box for a minute.
When we’re discussing shit like GBs vs V30s, Strats vs Les Pauls, or whatever and someone says “it’s not the gear, tone is in the fingers” I find that annoying. As if the tonal differences between two types of speakers are an illusion.
They may elaborate on how the way one holds the pick, vibrato, right and left hand dynamics etc massively affect tone. And I agree completely. But I’d call that technique, touch, a player’s style, I would not call that “tone.”
To me tone is something inherent to the rig, its potential. Great players harboring great technique, touch, talent can coax a great tone out of a given rig but the potential tone must be there, in the rig, first. So when someone says “yeah sure gear is part of it but tone is in the fingers, because they have the greatest impact overall.” I’d say I agree that fingers can have the greatest impact on tone. And it is precisely because they are two different things that fingers can have such a huge impact.
When someone says they’re a tone-chaser I never assume they mean that they are chasing something in their fingers.
And so on and so forth.
Wutchall think?