143 Brits died shortly after their jabs

  • Thread starter Thread starter JMP2203
  • Start date Start date
CNutz said:
The real virus triggers an extreme immune response, this causes the inflammation in your organs. The vaccine seem like it might trigger like immune response.
Click to expand...
From Jackbootedthug:
excuse me I forgot their symptoms....their heart walls are inflamed causing rapid heart rates. not sure if it's a result of covid or from recieving the vaccine to soon after being ill.

https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download

FDA Safety Surveillance of COVID-19 Vaccines : DRAFT Working list of possible adverse event outcomes ***Subject to change***

 Guillain-Barré syndrome
 Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
 Transverse myelitis
 Encephalitis/myelitis/encephalomyelitis/ meningoencephalitis/meningitis/ encepholapathy
 Convulsions/seizures
 Stroke
 Narcolepsy and cataplexy
 Anaphylaxis
 Acute myocardial infarction
 Myocarditis/pericarditis
 Autoimmune disease
 Deaths
 Pregnancy and birth outcomes
 Other acute demyelinating diseases
 Non-anaphylactic allergic reactions
 Thrombocytopenia
 Disseminated intravascular coagulation
 Venous thromboembolism
 Arthritis and arthralgia/joint pain
 Kawasaki disease
 Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children
 Vaccine enhanced disease
 
Last edited:
As of today, more than 220 million doses have been injected. More than 90% of Israel has been vaccinated. There have been 1,099 deaths reported for people that have received vaccines. 350 have been investigated so far. Of those,, every one has been over the age of 70, with an average age of 83. Every single one of them died from a separate pre-existing underlying disease. There have been zero cases with a causal link to the vaccine.
 
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) emerged in China in 2002 and spread to other countries before brought under control. Because of a concern for reemergence or a deliberate release of the SARS coronavirus, vaccine development was initiated. Evaluations of an inactivated whole virus vaccine in ferrets and nonhuman primates and a virus-like-particle vaccine in mice induced protection against infection but challenged animals exhibited an immunopathologic-type lung disease.

Design: Four candidate vaccines for humans with or without alum adjuvant were evaluated in a mouse model of SARS, a VLP vaccine, the vaccine given to ferrets and NHP, another whole virus vaccine and an rDNA-produced S protein. Balb/c or C57BL/6 mice were vaccinated i.m. on day 0 and 28 and sacrificed for serum antibody measurements or challenged with live virus on day 56. On day 58, challenged mice were sacrificed and lungs obtained for virus and histopathology.

Results: All vaccines induced serum neutralizing antibody with increasing dosages and/or alum significantly increasing responses. Significant reductions of SARS-CoV two days after challenge was seen for all vaccines and prior live SARS-CoV. All mice exhibited histopathologic changes in lungs two days after challenge including all animals vaccinated (Balb/C and C57BL/6) or given live virus, influenza vaccine, or PBS suggesting infection occurred in all. Histopathology seen in animals given one of the SARS-CoV vaccines was uniformly a Th2-type immunopathology with prominent eosinophil infiltration, confirmed with special eosinophil stains. The pathologic changes seen in all control groups lacked the eosinophil prominence.

Conclusions: These SARS-CoV vaccines all induced antibody and protection against infection with SARS-CoV. However, challenge of mice given any of the vaccines led to occurrence of Th2-type immunopathology suggesting hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV components was induced. Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22536382/
 
Last edited:
Brought to you by the same game that said:

Fat and cholesterol cause heart disease and make you abnormal

Sugar is normal and healthy

Emotions have no impact on health

The food guide pyramid makes you
normal (biggest health disaster in history)

Pills, potions and injections make you healthy

Chemo for cancer is normal

Circumcision is normal and healthy

Take your insulin and eat your carbs, type 2 diabetic

MMR vaccine doesn’t cause autism!

Spare me.

Trust has been broken. Blind leading blind.
 
Ry Manchu said:
As of today, more than 220 million doses have been injected. More than 90% of Israel has been vaccinated. There have been 1,099 deaths reported for people that have received vaccines. 350 have been investigated so far. Of those,, every one has been over the age of 70, with an average age of 83. Every single one of them died from a separate pre-existing underlying disease. There have been zero cases with a causal link to the vaccine.
Click to expand...
Ummm but those people that had those underlying diseases would still be alive if they hadn't taken the jab, so...theres the link to the vaccine
 
Metalhex said:
Ummm but those people that had those underlying diseases would still be alive if they hadn't taken the jab, so...theres the link to the vaccine
Click to expand...
Israel has a population around 10 million and about 6000 deaths from covid or underlying conditions. If they vaccinated 90% of the population and had 1000 deaths, the math back vaccines.

Worst case, they have an expected total deaths from complications near 1200 from vaccines. They already have 6x more deaths from people not vaccinated and not even 10% of the population caught it. If the entire population catches covid, the expected total deaths is 73000.

When you say "but what about those people that died after they were vaccinated", you are failing to mention the people that died already or will die because people aren't getting vaccinated. You are pretty much making the statement to let other more people die as long as it wasn't from the vaccine.

I'm not saying people dying from the vaccine is a good thing. We showed that, as a society, we cannot follow basic health guidelines to combat this without a vaccine. So the better outcome out of the remaining choices is to keep vaccinating people and try to limit the number of deaths from covid and vaccines combined as best as we can.
 
Last edited:
fantom said:
When you say "but what about those people that died after they were vaccinated",
Click to expand...
I never said that though. I am not comparing hypothetical statistics or which numbers would look better. What I am saying, is that for someone in their 50's + who have never been affected by covid or even gotten sick for a whole years times span now, who are thinking about getting stabbed, may actually die from getting said stab; it's a huge risk either way...theyve made it this far without it, so why risk putting a foreign, unapproved, experimental drug into their body just because someone, that you don't know, said you should?

It seems like the majority of people that died after getting the stab died because they had underlying conditions. That is not a great argument because the majority of the people that died "from covid", (before the stab came out) died because they had underlying conditions also. So of you have underlying health conditions and you get covid, you're probably going to die. If you have underlying health conditions and dont have covid, but get the covid stab, you're probably going to die.
 
Ry Manchu said:
As of today, more than 220 million doses have been injected. More than 90% of Israel has been vaccinated. There have been 1,099 deaths reported for people that have received vaccines. 350 have been investigated so far. Of those,, every one has been over the age of 70, with an average age of 83. Every single one of them died from a separate pre-existing underlying disease. There have been zero cases with a causal link to the vaccine.
Click to expand...
Same with covid
 
The scamdemic and the election scam all planned. Now you can see what a bumbling idiot you voted for in 2021. A god damn idiot with a bunch evil fuckheads telling him what to do because he is incapable of putting a fuckn ball point pen in his own coat pocket. Go to hell
 
So if this experimental genetic therapy with no animal trials or long term effect studies that only has the EUA and not full FDA approval how does the FDA know that these so called vaccines can cause these published 22 severe adverse side effects unless they have seen it in earlier animal trials?

Under the Nuremberg code of 1947 regarding human experimentation consent of the human is absolutely essential. This code has been adopted and endorsed by international law regarding human rights Do you understand these manufacturers have no liability if you develop any of these reactions up to including death? You are a subject in an experiment if you take this non FDA approved gene treatment/operating system as described by Moderna's website.



https://www.modernatx.com/mrna-technology/mrna-platform-enabling-drug-discovery-development
At a local Walgreen's I personally witnessed old senior citizen women signing their consent release form after they took their jabs and were asked to wait 15 minutes to see if they went into anaphylaxis and at no time were they informed of the FDA published 22 severe side effects. They signed and were none the wiser, are the 22 sever side effects even itemized in the legalese of the consent forms that people are signing. Are they fully informing people of the experimental status of the so called vaccine as the Nuremberg code clearly lays out?

The Nuremberg Code (1947)​

Permissible Medical Experiments​

The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:

  1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

    The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
  2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
  3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
  4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
  5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
  6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
  7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
  8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
  9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
  10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
 
Last edited:
Metalhex said:
I never said that though. I am not comparing hypothetical statistics or which numbers would look better. What I am saying, is that for someone in their 50's + who have never been affected by covid or even gotten sick for a whole years times span now, who are thinking about getting stabbed, may actually die from getting said stab; it's a huge risk either way...theyve made it this far without it, so why risk putting a foreign, unapproved, experimental drug into their body just because someone, that you don't know, said you should?

It seems like the majority of people that died after getting the stab died because they had underlying conditions. That is not a great argument because the majority of the people that died "from covid", (before the stab came out) died because they had underlying conditions also. So of you have underlying health conditions and you get covid, you're probably going to die. If you have underlying health conditions and dont have covid, but get the covid stab, you're probably going to die.
Click to expand...
There are no hypothetical numbers here. 220 million vaccines resulted in about 1000 possible deaths. Out of 114 million covid infections, 250,000 died. You are literally safer with everyone getting the vaccine than without it. This is not a hypothetical situation. The hypothetical situation is thinking that getting vaccinated will give you, or anyone else specifically, an unspecified number of health conditions.
 
Last edited:
fantom said:
The hypothetical situation is thinking that getting vaccinated will give you an unproven number of health conditions.
Click to expand...
Please provide the published scientific study/trial that proves that this unproven/previously unsuccessful gene therapy/vaccine definitively prevents infection and stops the transmission of the CV19 virus in patients that take the vaccine? How do you explain the countless accounts of people developing CV19 and severe issues and dying with the exact same severe afflictions as currently listed by the FDA? This also is not hypothetical conjecture .

This genetic therapy does not even meet the legal definition of VACCINE, lawyers that have litigated in the medical arena of vaccination has stated this, and it just happens to be the gentlemen that won the largest case awards against the manufacturerer of Glyphosate. Fauci will not allow himself to say this gene therapy prevents and stop transmission of CV19, only that it induces some antibody production, he is always very careful what he says. Watch the attached video link and listen closely to what Dr. Fauci says.

https://rumble.com/ve6gqx-fauci-in-hot-water.html
 
Last edited:
harddriver said:
Please provide the published scientific study/trial that proves that this unproven/previously unsuccessful gene therapy/vaccine definitively prevents infection and stops the transmission of the CV19 virus in patients that take the vaccine? How do you explain the countless accounts of people developing CV19 and severe issues and dying with the exact same severe afflictions as currently listed by the FDA? This also is not hypothetical conjecture .

This genetic therapy does not even meet the legal definition of VACCINE, lawyers that have litigated in the medical arena of vaccination has stated this, and it just happens to be the gentlemen that won the largest case awards against the manufacturerer of Glyphosate. Fauci will not allow himself to say this gene therapy prevents and stop transmission of CV19, only that it induces some antibody production, he is always very careful what he says. Watch the attached video link and listen closely to what Dr. Fauci says.

https://rumble.com/ve6gqx-fauci-in-hot-water.html
Click to expand...

Transmission rates were not assessed during clinical trials, so you can't make a claim either way. Those studies are starting to be peer reviewed now. Here are 2 of them:


https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.08.21251329v1
https://www.authorea.com/users/3327...cts-against-asymptomatic-sars-cov-2-infection
 
harddriver said:
Please provide the published scientific study/trial that proves that this unproven/previously unsuccessful gene therapy/vaccine definitively prevents infection and stops the transmission of the CV19 virus in patients that take the vaccine? How do you explain the countless accounts of people developing CV19 and severe issues and dying with the exact same severe afflictions as currently listed by the FDA? This also is not hypothetical conjecture .
[/URL]
Click to expand...
Except that what you are saying is simply not true. Nobody that has received their second shot of either the Pfizer or the Moderna vaccine has died directly from Covid 19. Those that did acquire Covid after their second shot had mild symptoms and were killed by preexisting underlying conditions. Nobody under the age of 70 has died from the vaccine. All deaths have been at an equal to lower rate of morbidity for a population over the age of 70. In other words, heart attacks, strokes, cancer, etc. at an equal to lower rate. Should the population over 70 not get vaccinated and catch Covid, the rate of morbidity is significantly higher, by several orders of magnitude.
 
fantom said:
There are no hypothetical numbers here. 220 million vaccines resulted in about 1000 possible deaths. Out of 114 million covid infections, 250,000 died. You are literally safer with everyone getting the vaccine than without it. This is not a hypothetical situation. The hypothetical situation is thinking that getting vaccinated will give you, or anyone else specifically, an unspecified number of health conditions.
Click to expand...
It is about, injecting oneself with an unknown, foreign, experimental, untested, unproven substance, from unknown people, in hopes to lessen the unknown effects from a voodoo virus that probably came out of some dogs asshole that some guy probably tried to eat in some filthy ally in the far east.

In order for your correlation to hold any weight, You'd have to show the numbers of people that had serious underlying medcial issues prior to getting stabbed by said unknown experimental Kool-aid....since technically It's possible that all of those 220 million people were perfectly healthy to begin with. Do we know out of all the people that have been vaccinated, how many had or didn't have serious underlying medical issues prior? Also, how long has this concoction been around for? Because covid19 has been around for more than a year.

We'll see about the long term effects of this "vaccine" once it actually has been around, long term.
 
Metalhex said:
It is about, injecting oneself with an unknown, foreign, experimental, untested, unproven substance, from unknown people, in hopes to lessen the unknown effects from a voodoo virus that probably came out of some dogs asshole that some guy probably tried to eat in some filthy ally in the far east.

In order for your correlation to hold any weight, You'd have to show the numbers of people that had serious underlying medcial issues prior to getting stabbed by said unknown experimental Kool-aid....since technically It's possible that all of those 220 million people were perfectly healthy to begin with. Do we know out of all the people that have been vaccinated, how many had or didn't have serious underlying medical issues prior? Also, how long has this concoction been around for? Because covid19 has been around for more than a year.

We'll see about the long term effects of this "vaccine" once it actually has been around, long term.
Click to expand...
You forgot to add in the microchip to track you even though you're obviously on the internet. I suppose we are all going to turn into crab people? You are probably writing that drinking Mountain Dew, eating a frozen TV dinner and smoking a 20 pack of unfiltered Mavericks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
 
Back
Top