Bikini Thread - OT Posts & Pics Removed

  • Thread starter Thread starter Minte
  • Start date Start date
Skeet said:
Big in what way?
Click to expand...
File size, as per our discussion a few weeks ago.

Skeet said:
Is this better?
Click to expand...
Yes, except for the .png file.

As a rule of thumb .png's are huge compared to jpg's, like, really-huge, 'cause there's no file-size compression whatsoever. This is why I suggested back then that you stick to jpg's, which thankfully comprise 98+% of shared images on the 'net, and for the aforementioned reason. Basically we're talking WAV / AIFF vs MP3. No prizes for guessing which of these formats dominates web audio and for the same reason.

Here're the sizes of the next 4 images in my queue for example, in-order, posted below:

180 KB
197 KB
66 KB
98 KB

If they were .png's, guaranteed at least 2 of them would've been over 1000 KB (1 MB) and the remaining 2 close to it.

FWIMBW I discussed the file-size issue with admin and there's a plugin in our next board-software update that can automatically constrain uploaded pics' sizes. Only problem is peeps on Macs older than 4 years won't be able to see them 'cause the software automatically converts uploads to an efficient-but-still-new format.

HTH

u5ZBwwcc_o.jpg


uBV4X3hp_o.jpg


Vanessa Bohorquez-35521274_1743213115727547_2316312567523311616_n.jpg


Vanessa Bohorquez-38412053_1820630997985758_682333508626022400_o.jpg
 
Computers are alien to me. Instead of just copy & paste as I do on other sites I started downloading pix in order to post here. Most are jpeg but lately some are png and it can differ from site to site when I download. I'll make sure they are only jpeg. I have come across a few sites that tell you up front that the photo is too large to post.
 
Monkey Man said:
File size, as per our discussion a few weeks ago.


Yes, except for the .png file.

As a rule of thumb .png's are huge compared to jpg's, like, really-huge, 'cause there's no file-size compression whatsoever. This is why I suggested back then that you stick to jpg's, which thankfully comprise 98+% of shared images on the 'net, and for the aforementioned reason. Basically we're talking WAV / AIFF vs MP3. No prizes for guessing which of these formats dominates web audio and for the same reason.

Here're the sizes of the next 4 images in my queue for example, in-order, posted below:

180 KB
197 KB
66 KB
98 KB

If they were .png's, guaranteed at least 2 of them would've been over 1000 KB (1 MB) and the remaining 2 close to it.

FWIMBW I discussed the file-size issue with admin and there's a plugin in our next board-software update that can automatically constrain uploaded pics' sizes. Only problem is peeps on Macs older than 4 years won't be able to see them 'cause the software automatically converts uploads to an efficient-but-still-new format.

HTH

View attachment 339255

View attachment 339258

View attachment 339261

View attachment 339264
Click to expand...
Excuse my ignorance but, why are these women oiled up? Are they jumping into a frying pan?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top