Bourbon Street Terrorist Attack

  • Thread starter Thread starter CRAIG4FSU
  • Start date Start date
Oh it’s an infringement. And more importantly it’s not an effective solution. It’s like gun control. Feel good bullshit to allow people to pretend to be doing something while not actually doing anything.

Until people wake up ( they won’t) to the fact that Islam is inherently evil NOTHING is going to stop it. Letting them flood into the country and build mosques and not assimilate is the fucking dumbest thing imaginable.
"Come in, welcome to all of you misjudged Muslims. Just don't kill us, please"
 
Those of you okay with being spied on think you're "Safe" because you're innocent. You don't consider that laws can change arbitrarily, or that law enforcement is not always benevolent. Privacy is intrinsic to human dignity and freedom. Zoo animals and inmates aren't allowed privacy. The people who want to invade your privacy are extremely protective of their own. Anyone seeking to undermine your privacy should be treated with suspicion and scorn.
Yes, your situation with law enforcement can turn on a dime.
An article in American Rifleman was a very good example: an outdoorsman had rescued an injured squirrel and racoon and they became pets. He posted vids online about his experience, became very popular and ad revenue allowed him take in other injured animals and care for them when the word got out.
From an anonymous complaint, he was raided. Several cars and trucks from various govt agencies pulled in one day and it was like a drug raid, turning his residence inside-out looking for....who knows what. His "patients" went thirsty and hungry for hours while the law kept him in the immediate vicinity, even following him to the bathroom.
They finally left, taking the pet racoon and squirrel under the pretense they may have rabies and euthanizing them (rather than quarantine) to test.
These were pets, the guy was doing a good service but once govt agencies got involved and obviously wanting to demonstrate the power they had, he paid the price for his good deeds.
 
Yes, your situation with law enforcement can turn on a dime.
An article in American Rifleman was a very good example: an outdoorsman had rescued an injured squirrel and racoon and they became pets. He posted vids online about his experience, became very popular and ad revenue allowed him take in other injured animals and care for them when the word got out.
From an anonymous complaint, he was raided. Several cars and trucks from various govt agencies pulled in one day and it was like a drug raid, turning his residence inside-out looking for....who knows what. His "patients" went thirsty and hungry for hours while the law kept him in the immediate vicinity, even following him to the bathroom.
They finally left, taking the pet racoon and squirrel under the pretense they may have rabies and euthanizing them (rather than quarantine) to test.
These were pets, the guy was doing a good service but once govt agencies got involved and obviously wanting to demonstrate the power they had, he paid the price for his good deeds.
Tacitus

“The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.”​

― Tacitus, The Annals of Imperial Rome
 
Until people wake up ( they won’t) to the fact that Islam is inherently evil NOTHING is going to stop it.
That's a biased and bigoted take. There are violent fanatics in every religion.
 
Tacitus

“The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.”​

― Tacitus, The Annals of Imperial Rome
reading-trump.gif
 
Oh it’s an infringement. And more importantly it’s not an effective solution. It’s like gun control. Feel good bullshit to allow people to pretend to be doing something while not actually doing anything.

Until people wake up ( they won’t) to the fact that Islam is inherently evil NOTHING is going to stop it. Letting them flood into the country and build mosques and not assimilate is the fucking dumbest thing imaginable.
Now if you were a good globalist with long term planning you would fund and nurture the radicalism by years of sectarian war and outright global and UN forces war because of WMD's and Terrorism as the justification to make their home countries so unlivable to drive them through forced and funded migration to countries that do not share their culture, sort of a trojan horse infiltration army thus destabilizing western nations from within and turning a once functioning govenrment/country into a gloabalist free for all for their natural resources...........seems like the plan has been implemented and working since 2001.



I guess the Vatican Albingensians Crusades, Holy Land Crusades and Spanish Inquisitions were perpetrated by those with morals and ethics of the highest orders without reproach.

https://www.un.org/en/migration2022/global-compact-for-migration

193 UN Member States recognized the need for a comprehensive approach to human mobility and enhanced cooperation at the global level
 
Now if you were a good globalist with long term planning you would fund and nurture the radicalism by years of sectarian war and outright global and UN forces war because of WMD's and Terrorism as the justification to make their home countries so unlivable to drive them through forced and funded migration to countries that do not share their culture, sort of a trojan horse infiltration army thus destabilizing western nations from within and turning a once functioning govenrment/country into a gloabalist free for all for their natural resources...........seems like the plan has been implemented and working since 2001.



I guess the Vatican Albingensians Crusades, Holy Land Crusades and Spanish Inquisitions were perpetrated by those with morals and ethics of the highest orders without reproach.

https://www.un.org/en/migration2022/global-compact-for-migration

193 UN Member States recognized the need for a comprehensive approach to human mobility and enhanced cooperation at the global level

 
That's a biased and bigoted take. There are violent fanatics in every religion.
You been hanging out with Dan too much dude. To pretend the level of Islamic terrorism is a few violent fanatics is insulting to the intelligence of every sane mother fucker on the planet. Very nearly ALL THE TERRORISM in the world is perpetrated by Muslims. You sound more and more like a leftist every day man.
 
You been hanging out with Dan too much dude. To pretend the level of Islamic terrorism is a few violent fanatics is insulting to the intelligence of every sane mother fucker on the planet. Very nearly ALL THE TERRORISM in the world is perpetrated by Muslims. You sound more and more like a leftist every day man.
I was mainly addressing your statement about Islam being inherently evil, not the claim that all the terrorism in the world is perpetrated by Muslims. But I disagree with that as well.
 
I was mainly addressing your statement about Islam being inherently evil, not the claim that all the terrorism in the world is perpetrated by Muslims. But I disagree with that as well.
Of course you do. And I didn't say all. The vast majority is though. Of course you think the Israeli response to the Oct. 7 attacks is terrorism so...
 
Of course you do. And I didn't say all. The vast majority is though. Of course you think the Israeli response to the Oct. 7 attacks is terrorism so...
Before we change the subject, let's go back to your statement that Islam is inherently evil. What's the basis for this claim?
 
Mainly the fact that it not only condones, but insists non believers be killed or converted.
No it doesn't. You're far from an authority in interpreting the Quran and you could make the same claim about the Bible.
 
No it doesn't. You're far from an authority in interpreting the Quran and you could make the same claim about the Bible.
And you're an authority ? :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

The great interpreter. Interpret this ?

"We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve"


Some things don't need interpretation, although I understand that using "Interpretations" is pretty much your MO for defending your tenuous arguments. Space is fake, earth isn't a sphere, economics, etc. In any case, I have little interest in your interpretation of a book I'm betting you've never read, much less have credibility to interpret.
 
I have little interest in your interpretation of a book I'm betting you've never read, much less have credibility to interpret.
You're the one that made the stupid claim, not me, Mullah Floyd.
 
And then proved it.
To a simpleton perhaps. Needless to say, if your view is correct we have over a billion and a half Muslims that aren't very devoted to their faith. (Or as knowledgeable as you about it either) ?
 
Back
Top