napalmdeath
Well-known member
To me it's a bunch of pants-wetting over nothing. It's a change in their reporting threshold, not a change in our actual tax burden. We're on the hook for the same things regardless of the 1099, and none of that is even remotely new.
I tend to acquire more gear than I sell each year. Even when I don't have gig revenue and it's just a "hobby", it's still a net loss, which I report and deduct. I also capitalize guitars, amps, and things like that, so I can carry depreciation on them, which is also deductible. Most of my local musician buddies don't report any of it, and they're probably leaving money on the table by doing so. Whatevs. I'm happy to find cover in their over-payment.
There's also this: if I don't want my personal gear sales treated as commerce, then I DON'T SELL IT COMMERCIALLY. Seriously, some of y'all seem really perplexed by why selling your shit commercially doesn't give you the same autonomy as selling it privately.
Sure, it's not THAT big of a deal, but who wants to be bothered with having to prove losses on multiple transactions, and/or hire an accountant to navigate through what is, after all, nonsense. Let's be realistic.. I'd be willing to bet most who buy/sell on Reverb and Ebay alone, (as hobbies, or to earn a little extra cash), are middle or even lower class. That said, that would translate to targeting a certain demographic to pay their fair share. Like I said.. Pants wetting or not, it's utter nonsense and really serves no purpose other than to squeeze a few more bucks out of John Q Public that flipped a guitar that he made $200 profit on. The IRS gets richer, and John Q Public has a new tax burden, vs. spending that money to keep restaurants open, stores open, buy another guitar, etc. It's stupid.