Celestion V30 versions - Do some have a bigger magnet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Random Hero
  • Start date Start date
FourT6and2":376t89n1 said:
Racerxrated":376t89n1 said:
"Best" is subjective..I will take a 90's Fender 4x12 over the Mesa any day..that V30 sounds better to me than the Mesa proprietary V30. The Chinese seem a bit harsher and I've played broken in Chinese V30s. The Marshall Vintage is the original V30 design but can be a bit crispy on the top end. Lots of different V30s but my favorite is the older Fender Tonemaster 4x12 with British V30s...YMMV.

Of course it's subjective. That's why I worded it the way I worded it. I presumed the context would be sufficient...

And your experience 100% matches what Fryette said. That the Marshall V30 is "crispy on the top end," the Chinese V30 is a little "harsh." And guess what... that Fender Tonemaster 4x12 with the British V30 you love so much has the same exact speakers as the Mesa. ;) If you read what Fryette said you'll see that at one Point (late '90s) Celestion changed production on those speakers and Mesa demanded Celestion keep supplying them with the original version, which Celestion then relabled with the new model code. But they're the same original V30 that Fender used which you claim are better than the Mesa versions. But the funny thing is they're the same speaker.

If this part is true, then the two quads of V30's that I just sold off were the Mesa type. Four of them were from a Fender Tonemaster cab with speaker dates from Sept. 1997 and the other four were from a Trace Elliot 4x12. Pretty sure from 1997 also. All were 16 ohm and sounded awesome. I however like the Chinese and Marshall versions just fine. But the 8 I sold were great. I've since moved on to the Celestion Century Vintage. A different flavor of V30 but still in the ballpark. A little tighter and a little bit of a drier crispiness to them. Works great for me and they are 3 pounds each!! :rock:
 
bubbastain":32lm9q7x said:
FourT6and2":32lm9q7x said:
Racerxrated":32lm9q7x said:
"Best" is subjective..I will take a 90's Fender 4x12 over the Mesa any day..that V30 sounds better to me than the Mesa proprietary V30. The Chinese seem a bit harsher and I've played broken in Chinese V30s. The Marshall Vintage is the original V30 design but can be a bit crispy on the top end. Lots of different V30s but my favorite is the older Fender Tonemaster 4x12 with British V30s...YMMV.

Of course it's subjective. That's why I worded it the way I worded it. I presumed the context would be sufficient...

And your experience 100% matches what Fryette said. That the Marshall V30 is "crispy on the top end," the Chinese V30 is a little "harsh." And guess what... that Fender Tonemaster 4x12 with the British V30 you love so much has the same exact speakers as the Mesa. ;) If you read what Fryette said you'll see that at one Point (late '90s) Celestion changed production on those speakers and Mesa demanded Celestion keep supplying them with the original version, which Celestion then relabled with the new model code. But they're the same original V30 that Fender used which you claim are better than the Mesa versions. But the funny thing is they're the same speaker.

If this part is true, then the two quads of V30's that I just sold off were the Mesa type. Four of them were from a Fender Tonemaster cab with speaker dates from Sept. 1997 and the other four were from a Trace Elliot 4x12. Pretty sure from 1997 also. All were 16 ohm and sounded awesome. I however like the Chinese and Marshall versions just fine. But the 8 I sold were great. I've since moved on to the Celestion Century Vintage. A different flavor of V30 but still in the ballpark. A little tighter and a little bit of a drier crispiness to them. Works great for me and they are 3 pounds each!! :rock:

It would probably be more accurate to call them original V30s, rather than the "Mesa type" because it's not like Fender was using Mesa speakers. Mesa just got on Celestion's back when they switched production to China, so Celestion agreed to keep making their original versions in England specifically for Mesa after the switch. But yeah... the V30s you like so much from back in the day in your Fender cabs are the same speakers that Celestion currently manufacturers for Mesa. At least according to the information Mr. Fryette shared. But it would be a good idea to double check the cone/speaker codes to make sure...
 
I'm not entirely sold on Mr. Fryette's recollection on the history of V30 production. Celestion introduced the 'Marshall Vintage' speaker in 1986, for the Studio 15 combo amp. Marshall started putting those speakers in 4x12s in 1987. They do not say Vintage 30 on any part of the speaker. AFAIK, Mesa never used V30s, of any sort, until the Dual Rectifier amp was introduced in 91/92. The 'Mesa' V30s obviously say 'Vintage 30' on them. The Mesa and Marshall speakers sound and respond differently but both easily fall into what most associate with a 'V30' type of tone. So, perhaps its best to say the Mesa is the original spec of a 'Vintage 30' labelled speaker, but the Marshall Vintage is the true original spec of the larger V30 'family'.
 
FourT6and2":3iszpzqz said:
bubbastain":3iszpzqz said:
FourT6and2":3iszpzqz said:
Racerxrated":3iszpzqz said:
"Best" is subjective..I will take a 90's Fender 4x12 over the Mesa any day..that V30 sounds better to me than the Mesa proprietary V30. The Chinese seem a bit harsher and I've played broken in Chinese V30s. The Marshall Vintage is the original V30 design but can be a bit crispy on the top end. Lots of different V30s but my favorite is the older Fender Tonemaster 4x12 with British V30s...YMMV.

Of course it's subjective. That's why I worded it the way I worded it. I presumed the context would be sufficient...

And your experience 100% matches what Fryette said. That the Marshall V30 is "crispy on the top end," the Chinese V30 is a little "harsh." And guess what... that Fender Tonemaster 4x12 with the British V30 you love so much has the same exact speakers as the Mesa. ;) If you read what Fryette said you'll see that at one Point (late '90s) Celestion changed production on those speakers and Mesa demanded Celestion keep supplying them with the original version, which Celestion then relabled with the new model code. But they're the same original V30 that Fender used which you claim are better than the Mesa versions. But the funny thing is they're the same speaker.

If this part is true, then the two quads of V30's that I just sold off were the Mesa type. Four of them were from a Fender Tonemaster cab with speaker dates from Sept. 1997 and the other four were from a Trace Elliot 4x12. Pretty sure from 1997 also. All were 16 ohm and sounded awesome. I however like the Chinese and Marshall versions just fine. But the 8 I sold were great. I've since moved on to the Celestion Century Vintage. A different flavor of V30 but still in the ballpark. A little tighter and a little bit of a drier crispiness to them. Works great for me and they are 3 pounds each!! :rock:

It would probably be more accurate to call them original V30s, rather than the "Mesa type" because it's not like Fender was using Mesa speakers. Mesa just got on Celestion's back when they switched production to China, so Celestion agreed to keep making their original versions in England specifically for Mesa after the switch. But yeah... the V30s you like so much from back in the day in your Fender cabs are the same speakers that Celestion currently manufacturers for Mesa. At least according to the information Mr. Fryette shared. But it would be a good idea to double check the cone/speaker codes to make sure...

Well, All 8 of them still had the 444 cone code and were also T3904. Either way, they sounded nice. Especially with all 8 of them going loud. :D I'm still rockin the Celestion 85's and the Century's.
 
thegame":143iy3tu said:
I'm not entirely sold on Mr. Fryette's recollection on the history of V30 production. Celestion introduced the 'Marshall Vintage' speaker in 1986, for the Studio 15 combo amp. Marshall started putting those speakers in 4x12s in 1987. They do not say Vintage 30 on any part of the speaker. AFAIK, Mesa never used V30s, of any sort, until the Dual Rectifier amp was introduced in 91/92. The 'Mesa' V30s obviously say 'Vintage 30' on them. The Mesa and Marshall speakers sound and respond differently but both easily fall into what most associate with a 'V30' type of tone. So, perhaps its best to say the Mesa is the original spec of a 'Vintage 30' labelled speaker, but the Marshall Vintage is the true original spec of the larger V30 'family'.

Yes I would agree with you that it would be more accurate to say that the Mesa is the "original spec V30." But not the same as the old Marshall versions. But they are all part of the V30 family. That is Mr. Fryette's point, isn't it? Everything you've said mirrors what Steve Fryette wrote. Unless I'm misinterpreting what you're saying?

From my understanding the timeline went something like this:

In 1986, Celestion created a speaker for Marshall that was labeled "Marshall Vintage." This was the first iteration of the V30.
Later on, in the '90s, an updated version was created that was labeled "Vintage 30."
Then Celestion moved production to China. Mesa said, "No way jose. We like them the way they are." So Celestion kept making them the same way for Mesa in England, and changed to speaker code.

So you're left with a few versions of the V30: Original "Marshall Vintage," original "Vintage 30" (which is the same as the Mesa V30), and the new Chinese-made V30. That's how I understand it.
 
bubbastain":3c5drtg8 said:
FourT6and2":3c5drtg8 said:
bubbastain":3c5drtg8 said:
FourT6and2":3c5drtg8 said:
Racerxrated":3c5drtg8 said:
"Best" is subjective..I will take a 90's Fender 4x12 over the Mesa any day..that V30 sounds better to me than the Mesa proprietary V30. The Chinese seem a bit harsher and I've played broken in Chinese V30s. The Marshall Vintage is the original V30 design but can be a bit crispy on the top end. Lots of different V30s but my favorite is the older Fender Tonemaster 4x12 with British V30s...YMMV.

Of course it's subjective. That's why I worded it the way I worded it. I presumed the context would be sufficient...

And your experience 100% matches what Fryette said. That the Marshall V30 is "crispy on the top end," the Chinese V30 is a little "harsh." And guess what... that Fender Tonemaster 4x12 with the British V30 you love so much has the same exact speakers as the Mesa. ;) If you read what Fryette said you'll see that at one Point (late '90s) Celestion changed production on those speakers and Mesa demanded Celestion keep supplying them with the original version, which Celestion then relabled with the new model code. But they're the same original V30 that Fender used which you claim are better than the Mesa versions. But the funny thing is they're the same speaker.

If this part is true, then the two quads of V30's that I just sold off were the Mesa type. Four of them were from a Fender Tonemaster cab with speaker dates from Sept. 1997 and the other four were from a Trace Elliot 4x12. Pretty sure from 1997 also. All were 16 ohm and sounded awesome. I however like the Chinese and Marshall versions just fine. But the 8 I sold were great. I've since moved on to the Celestion Century Vintage. A different flavor of V30 but still in the ballpark. A little tighter and a little bit of a drier crispiness to them. Works great for me and they are 3 pounds each!! :rock:

It would probably be more accurate to call them original V30s, rather than the "Mesa type" because it's not like Fender was using Mesa speakers. Mesa just got on Celestion's back when they switched production to China, so Celestion agreed to keep making their original versions in England specifically for Mesa after the switch. But yeah... the V30s you like so much from back in the day in your Fender cabs are the same speakers that Celestion currently manufacturers for Mesa. At least according to the information Mr. Fryette shared. But it would be a good idea to double check the cone/speaker codes to make sure...

Well, All 8 of them still had the 444 cone code and were also T3904. Either way, they sounded nice. Especially with all 8 of them going loud. :D I'm still rockin the Celestion 85's and the Century's.

T3904 V30s are made in China. Original, older ones from the early '90s (before they switched production to China) might have also had this code (I'm not sure), but they were made in England. The point is that when Celestion moved production to China, Mesa demanded their V30s remain unchanged. So Celestion did that, and gave those speakers their own special code T4416/T4335 to signify the difference.

Here's some more info from another person:

MGSchindel":3c5drtg8 said:
That's a good question, since there seem to be at least three distinct voicings of this speaker that I keep coming across. After years of mic'ing different cabs and cranking different cabs and mixing different speakers with different amps, looking for the right tones, liking some of them and not liking others, on occasion, I've pulled this together just from general observations:

The Mesa-only proprietary V30 seems to have its own thing going. Warmer and smoother right out of the gate, with its mids shifted lower and its highs more rolled off than the others, it sounds more broken in almost right away, to my ear, no matter what cab you stick it in. It carries its own celestion model codes. Here is a Mesa-only, custom-voiced proprietary V30, English made, post 2002, taken out of tall Recto cab. Model T4335 with extra copper on voice coil, seems like slightly different suspension and adhesives, straight 444 cone, etc.



MesaV30.jpg



mesav302.jpg




Below is an old mid-90’s England-made (same as current chinese made) celestion-only voiced V30, painted tan-gold frame, model T3904, cone is stamped D20 444…..mids and treble sit differently from the Mesa and Marshall versions, to my ear, and I guess celestion couldn't be using either of the proprietary mesa or marshall voiced V30 sounds, for its own raw frame speakers available to the general public. Other amp manufacturers that are NOT mesa or marshall typically have this version of the V30 in their cabs, such as Engl, Randall, etc. Still reasonably warm but can be chesty and fizzy with some amps, and really benefits from heavy break-in to smooth out the fatiguing mid spike it throws off with some amps. Seems to have some extra 700hz too.



englishV30.jpg


britv30.jpg




And here’s the Marshall “Vintage” proprietary marshall-only model T3897, raw silver frame, made by celestion in England for Marshall, OEM. It never actually has Vintage "30" printed on the magnet sticker, just "Vintage". This is the first, earliest, longest-running, and original V30, initially designed and released in 1986 for use in some Marshall amps and cabs, before Mesa and Celestion ever had their own custom voicings later on in the 90's. If you're hearing a v30 tone on a recording made before 1990, it's these speakers. They were originally designed to sound almost like an AlNiCo speaker, but using a large ceramic magnet, sort of a cross between a celestion Blue and a G12H30.

This Marshall Vintage speaker seems the brightest, most crunchy, most metallic and most cutting of the bunch, with the upper mids and treble sitting differently (shifted higher up, overall) than either of the later mesa-only or celestion-only variants, to my ear. Less chesty mid-mids, and harder sounding upper mids, than the others. Treble can be quite piercing depending how you dial it with some amps, at high volumes. The cones are always just stamped 444. You'll find these in some of the old Marshall silver jubilee cabs from 1987-1988 particularly, and thereafter in the current- production Marshall 1960AV/BV cabs


Marshallv30.jpg


marshallv302.jpg



All V30s out there are NOT created equal. All V30s are not designed the same. All V30’s are not made in China, even today, not that it matters, per se. All V30s are not made from the same parts and materials. All three versions above, for example, sound noticeably different to me. Some work better than others with certain amps. They all generally have a V30-type sound and clearly all live in the same tonal family, but the mic and the human ear and the band mix do not experience them all the same way, IMHO. They each require different amp settings with the same amp. YMMV. I am also advised by Celestion directly that ALL verisons of the V30, no matter when or where or for whom made, are about 65 watts in actuality. So the discretionary 70w or 60w ratings of various manufacturers as printed on their cabs over the years have no real bearing on sound, quality, build, etc. That has never changed. If your 1998 Mesa recto cab has 280w printed on the speaker jack plate, and your 2011 Mesa recto cab has 240w printed on the speaker jack plate, rest assured it is still the same English-made T4335 V30 inside, unchanged since about 1991, with the same tone and power handling. If the older one sounds better, it's just more broken in and the adhesives, magnets and paper cones are aging nicely.

Yes a Marshall 1960BV cab will sound different from a Randall XL4x12B will sound different from a Mesa Stiletto cab. No, it's not just the cabinet design, the speakers themselves are all different models inside each of them, so pick you favorite based on your amp and the overall tone you hear for the speaker model in question which you prefer, rather than "brand hype."

Hopefully this post will dispel at least some of the many internet myths and misinformation of the mysterious V30 and its different models and voicings, which no one ever seems to have any actual factual info about, and no one seems very comfortable discussing. If you've ever hated or loved a V30 with an amp, someone else may not be having the same experience because the particular V30 they alternately hate or love may actually have a slightly different voicing and be a different T code model altogether, notwitstanding how a really good break-in over the years can affect all of the above.
 
FourT6and2":2ra4hzjb said:
Racerxrated":2ra4hzjb said:
"Best" is subjective..I will take a 90's Fender 4x12 over the Mesa any day..that V30 sounds better to me than the Mesa proprietary V30. The Chinese seem a bit harsher and I've played broken in Chinese V30s. The Marshall Vintage is the original V30 design but can be a bit crispy on the top end. Lots of different V30s but my favorite is the older Fender Tonemaster 4x12 with British V30s...YMMV.

Of course it's subjective. That's why I worded it the way I worded it. I presumed the context would be sufficient...

And your experience 100% matches what Fryette said. That the Marshall V30 is "crispy on the top end," the Chinese V30 is a little "harsh." And guess what... that Fender Tonemaster 4x12 with the British V30 you love so much has the same exact speakers as the Mesa. ;) If you read what Fryette said you'll see that at one Point (late '90s) Celestion changed production on those speakers and Mesa demanded Celestion keep supplying them with the original version, which Celestion then relabled with the new model code. But they're the same original V30 that Fender used which you claim are better than the Mesa versions. But the funny thing is they're the same speaker.
Gotcha. I have had 2 Mesa cabs, one with the diamond plating(LOLOL) and a regular cab. They sounded good but when I picked up the Fender cab, it killed the Mesa IMO..must be the cab design then. Great info BTW..I did read that post before and learned a lot. But I must have missed the part about the tonemaster V30s being the same as the Mesa..when I get home I'll pull one out and take a look. Great info though!
 
Racerxrated":2qmqucnv said:
FourT6and2":2qmqucnv said:
Racerxrated":2qmqucnv said:
"Best" is subjective..I will take a 90's Fender 4x12 over the Mesa any day..that V30 sounds better to me than the Mesa proprietary V30. The Chinese seem a bit harsher and I've played broken in Chinese V30s. The Marshall Vintage is the original V30 design but can be a bit crispy on the top end. Lots of different V30s but my favorite is the older Fender Tonemaster 4x12 with British V30s...YMMV.

Of course it's subjective. That's why I worded it the way I worded it. I presumed the context would be sufficient...

And your experience 100% matches what Fryette said. That the Marshall V30 is "crispy on the top end," the Chinese V30 is a little "harsh." And guess what... that Fender Tonemaster 4x12 with the British V30 you love so much has the same exact speakers as the Mesa. ;) If you read what Fryette said you'll see that at one Point (late '90s) Celestion changed production on those speakers and Mesa demanded Celestion keep supplying them with the original version, which Celestion then relabled with the new model code. But they're the same original V30 that Fender used which you claim are better than the Mesa versions. But the funny thing is they're the same speaker.
Gotcha. I have had 2 Mesa cabs, one with the diamond plating(LOLOL) and a regular cab. They sounded good but when I picked up the Fender cab, it killed the Mesa IMO..must be the cab design then. Great info BTW..I did read that post before and learned a lot. But I must have missed the part about the tonemaster V30s being the same as the Mesa..when I get home I'll pull one out and take a look. Great info though!

Yeah double check the speaker codes and you'll know for sure. As far sound difference, the same speaker will most certainly sound different in different cabs. So if they were the same speakers, the difference was cab-to-cab.
 
Ummm...

Can somebody please tell me how to get brand new English v-30's today... these easy fast way?
 
 
Back
Top