CNutz' Underboob Thread Deleted. WTF?

[RelicStrat]

Rig-talk is really TGP now so why not go where there's far more info guitar related.
Not being provocative just stating the obvious.

In life today everything is a chain store all in plain vanilla & RT is no exception now, where's the small vendor offering a unique & exciting experience.

Ayn Rand is having a fit of rage in her grave today as it's gone exactly as she said it would.

Everyone is sold there are so many choices but we all now can see that's 100% BS.

Personal responsibility is not wanted or allowed today. Everyone must fall into line otherwise you're shunned or expelled.

2021 continues delivering asshole after asshole.

 

[panhead]

This is an off-topic forum for an elite elictric guitar and rig site. It is not, in essence, a place to dump hundreds of sexually suggestive photos of bimbos.

Pics of hot girl musicians will fly, as it is related and fun without being obscene.

That thread was basically a spank bank and does not in any way belong here.

I love ya bro and hope this reply doesn’t stick in the craw too bad. I’m surprised it lasted as long as it did.

You must work for the french fucks that own this forum and yes I just said that.

 

[Artjr]

Spank bank, lol. Like someone’s gonna spank with monkey man watching from the side. Come on,It was total woke ass bullshit that got it removed.
trying to make RT like TGP. Only problem with TGP they shouldn’t have something called The Pub unless you can talk like you’re in a Pub.

 

[Monkey Man]

Sex, drugs and rock 'n roll, innit?

So in OT we could try talkin' drugs seeing as sex was removed (not even sex, but you get the point).

Then what? if drugs are removed that leaves only R & R, which hardly requires an OT subforum on this site.

It just makes no sense to me.

 

[Artjr]

If a person don’t like women they don’t have to look. They can look at Homosexual Superheroes. Why wasn’t that deleted? I’m sure that’s a spank bank for someone.

 

[fantom]

Personal responsibility is not wanted or allowed today. Everyone must fall into line otherwise you're shunned or expelled.

More personal responsibility is definitely wanted. Many people are acting like children. It isn't about falling in line. It is about being civil in a public forum.

 

[fantom]

Pics of hot girl musicians will fly, as it is related and fun without being obscene.

Honestly, I don't see the difference. You are either sexualizing a women or you aren't. Why should the fact she is a musician or holding a guitar make a difference? I'm down to see pictures of attractive women, but not sure this point should matter.

 

[JackBootedThug]

i like boobs. sorry i missed it.

 

[Monkey Man]

Well there you have it, folks. Straight from a mod's mouth.

If you're not married / don't have a girlfriend, why would you not want to look at pics of hot women who choose to pose, doing their best to look hot for a camera, with the express intention of attracting male attention? Heck even if you are married, many wifies don't care anyway.

These gals made the choice to cash in on it; you're just a consumer and the intended target. Who's exploiting who? Further to that, these women sexualised themselves, choosing to pose as objects of desire. Who's objectifying who? They're already-objectified by definition.

Sorry you missed the thread, Stoivo; I posted a shedload of vetted pics for all tastes and had a bucketload lined up for daily updates.

The fact that it was all deleted with no warning or explanation, is beyond the pale as far as I'm concerned. This is OTC at Rig Talk, after all. Most of those pics have been posted on instagram and facebook with no adult restrictions, FWIMBW. This is alarming to me.

 

[Artjr]

I thought the same thing Monkey

 

[fantom]

Well there you have it, folks. Straight from a mod's mouth.

If you're not married / don't have a girlfriend, why would you not want to look at pics of hot women who choose to pose, doing their best to look hot for a camera, with the express intention of attracting male attention? Heck even if you are married, many wifies don't care anyway.

These gals made the choice to cash in on it; you're just a consumer and the intended target. Who's exploiting who? Further to that, these women sexualised themselves, choosing to pose as objects of desire. Who's objectifying who? They're already-objectified by definition.

Sorry you missed the thread, Stoivo; I posted a shedload of vetted pics for all tastes and had a bucketload lined up for daily updates.

The fact that it was all deleted with no warning or explanation, is beyond the pale as far as I'm concerned. This is OTC at Rig Talk, after all. Most of those pics have been posted on instagram and facebook with no adult restrictions, FWIMBW. This is alarming to me.

So first off, I agree with you on a personal level.

That being said, is it really the right place? Let's say I find someone who wants to be objectified and offered them cash to walk around in a Target all week wearing a bikini. Would I expect annoyed customers? Yep. Would I expect the Target to ask her to leave or put on clothes? Definitely. Would I throw a fit if Target called the police and kicked her out of the store? Nope.

The first 2-3 paragraphs of text are detracting from your main point, that you think the mods overstepped boundaries. This is akin to saying you would prefer the Target manager ask the women to put on clothes before calling the police.

And I think my point is, who cares? The chick can be in the store, and I'll look. And if she gets kicked out, why start acting like Target is stepping on my dick and corrupting my merchandise? I can still shop at Target and not give a crap because I have no expectations that bikini-clad women are running around the store in the first place. This is a gear forum, not a beach.

 

[RelicStrat]

So first off, I agree with you on a personal level.

That being said, is it really the right place? Let's say I find someone who wants to be objectified and offered them cash to walk around in a Target all week wearing a bikini. Would I expect annoyed customers? Yep. Would I expect the Target to ask her to leave or put on clothes? Definitely. Would I throw a fit if Target called the police and kicked her out of the store? Nope.

The first 2-3 paragraphs of text are detracting from your main point, that you think the mods overstepped boundaries. This is akin to saying you would prefer the Target manager ask the women to put on clothes before calling the police.

And I think my point is, who cares? The chick can be in the store, and I'll look. And if she gets kicked out, why start acting like Target is stepping on my dick and corrupting my merchandise? I can still shop at Target and not give a crap because I have no expectations that bikini-clad women are running around the store in the first place. This is a gear forum, not a beach.

I can see where you're 'trying' to come from however, it ain't an apples for apples comparison in any sense of the word.

Musicians write songs about sex & love. They also write songs directly about women.

Guitars are considered a sexual tool or object to many.

Many play guitar to attract & appeal to women.

See, RT has an audience that is mostly about the opposite sex.

Target? They have shoppers focused on merchandise and sometimes shopping with their minors.

I just love it when the woke think they have the answers to justify their twisted reality which is insulting & ridiculous.

 

[fantom]

I can see where you're 'trying' to come from however, it ain't an apples for apples comparison in any sense of the word.

Musicians write songs about sex & love. They also write songs directly about women.

Guitars are considered a sexual tool or object to many.

Many play guitar to attract & appeal to women.

See, RT has an audience that is mostly about the opposite sex.

Target? They have shoppers focused on merchandise and sometimes shopping with their minors.

I just love it when the woke think they have the answers to justify their twisted reality which is insulting & ridiculous.

Drinking game time: Everyone take a shot, someone used the phrase "woke" to sound superior to someone else on the internet

 

[sytharnia1560]

To me the weird thing is a topic with females wearing next to nothing (that they are quite happy to put online) gets pulled ... yet people on here can call each other "fag" "homo" "cunt" and other sorts of babyish child like name calling and it is fine. And a few of those people never ever comment on actual guitar related stuff--on a guitar related parts of the forum

 

[RelicStrat]

To me the weird thing is a topic with females wearing next to nothing (that they are quite happy to put online) gets pulled ... yet people on here can call each other "fag" "homo" "cunt" and other sorts of babyish child like name calling and it is fine. And a few of those people never ever comment on actual guitar related stuff--on a guitar related parts of the forum

It can't be me, I'm innocent.

Here are few of my related items.

Lucky I ain't leaning my tits on any of them.

 

[RelicStrat]

To me the weird thing is a topic with females wearing next to nothing (that they are quite happy to put online) gets pulled ... yet people on here can call each other "fag" "homo" "cunt" and other sorts of babyish child like name calling and it is fine. And a few of those people never ever comment on actual guitar related stuff--on a guitar related parts of the forum

Jokes aside for a moment.

This is the century of the hypocrite from every corner.

A (nature's creation) boob post gets nuked however, RT's emojis could be considered offensive & some of a sexual nature. Hypocrisy in play.....as usual.

Subjectivity is not consistent, not the truth, not reality, it's a pseudo form of reality/reaction of a mind that hasn't yet concluded true intent from the sender or nature's way.

We see today the weaponization of subjectivity because humans are waring creatures and can't help themselves no matter how evolved they believe they are. Fact is, we haven't come forward one inch. We have sophisticated toys, views, words & weapons but our use of them all remains the same as when we started.

Humans need to fully accept what they are and life everywhere would be far easier. We work, we eat and we procreate as intended by the almighty....nature. Procreation is our main objective at all times and visual stimulus assists in getting the job done faster and more frequently.

So called intellects and social warriors need to realise nature's intent & leave well alone.

Money is not God and therefore should not interfere with nature's way. Because at the end of all this hypocrisy, in this century, money is the motivator and end game to them all.

 

[fantom]

Jokes aside for a moment.

This is the century of the hypocrite from every corner.

A (nature's creation) boob post gets nuked however, RT's emojis could be considered offensive & some of a sexual nature. Hypocrisy in play.....as usual.

Subjectivity is not consistent, not the truth, not reality, it's a pseudo form of reality/reaction of a mind that hasn't yet concluded true intent from the sender or nature's way.

We see today the weaponization of subjectivity because humans are waring creatures and can't help themselves no matter how evolved they believe they are. Fact is, we haven't come forward one inch. We have sophisticated toys, views, words & weapons but our use of them all remains the same as when we started.

Humans need to fully accept what they are and life everywhere would be far easier. We work, we eat and we procreate as intended by the almighty....nature. Procreation is our main objective at all times and visual stimulus assists in getting the job done faster and more frequently.

So called intellects and social warriors need to realise nature's intent & leave well alone.

Money is not God and therefore should not interfere with nature's way. Because at the end of all this hypocrisy, in this century, money is the motivator and end game to them all.

Money gets dudes laid much more often than pictures on the internet, just ask any incel.

 

[Monkey Man]

So first off, I agree with you on a personal level.

That being said, is it really the right place? Let's say I find someone who wants to be objectified and offered them cash to walk around in a Target all week wearing a bikini. Would I expect annoyed customers? Yep. Would I expect the Target to ask her to leave or put on clothes? Definitely. Would I throw a fit if Target called the police and kicked her out of the store? Nope.

Two major flaws in this argument:

1) The "Target"(!) audience is wildly-different.
2) The pics were "buried" in a thread in the OT subforum. IOW, those bikini gals are not wandering around on the main floor of the establishment. The equivalent would be confining them to a room out the back of Target with a sign on the door warning that offence may be taken if one enters. Rig Talk even has this warning as the subtitle to this subforum.

The first 2-3 paragraphs of text are detracting from your main point, that you think the mods overstepped boundaries. This is akin to saying you would prefer the Target manager ask the women to put on clothes before calling the police.

Disagree.

Those paragraphs addressed the proposition that had been forwarded that we were objectifying them. So, I pointed out that our actions were natural-and-understandable (not exploitative) and that the gals themselves had already made the decision to voluntarily portray themselves as "objects" of desire.

Had I not addressed the accusation, the overall argument would've been half-arsed / incomplete. Those two points are foundational pillars IMHO and can't be ignored, lest we build our house on sand.

And I think my point is, who cares? The chick can be in the store, and I'll look. And if she gets kicked out, why start acting like Target is stepping on my dick and corrupting my merchandise? I can still shop at Target and not give a crap because I have no expectations that bikini-clad women are running around the store in the first place.

'Cause Target told you that you can use the back room for anything you like except porn and threats of physical violence, that's why.

This is a gear forum, not a beach.

Indeed, and OT is for cars, chicks, alcohol, cooking, movies and everything else that interests rockers.

You've argued numerous times using the straw man, "... the forum is for...". This is true only of the main RT and manufacturer subforums, not OT Central.

Cheers bud.

 

[Findthetone1]

Just start another thread about it but call it “The feminine power of the breast underside, and how it took down Donald Trump”. Then it will fly with the woke police.

 

[Nigel]

You must work for the french fucks that own this forum and yes I just said that.

No. I am just of a divergent opinion and not taking or making it personal.