Does the world really need any Monarchy’s???

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheBiggestJerk
  • Start date Start date
Not my fleas... not my circus.

If people are dumb enough to give them money because of their genetics... let them.
 
I'm not trying to get anyone in trouble but maybe remove posting privileges for a period after a warning?
It's not a problem mate; just funny.

So yeah, I've never issued a warning for something like this, nor would I. :dunno:
 
It's not a problem mate; just funny.

So yeah, I've never issued a warning for something like this, nor would I. :dunno:
I do it out of love, plus I’m ensuring job security for the great ape!
 
What about "democracy"? Unnecessary and obsolete.
IMG_6164.jpeg
 
Not really a strawman. Your argument assumes our modern forms of government are better without substantiating it.
It assumes nothing. You assumed it and countered with the textbook definition of a strawman that was easily recognized as such.
 
Last edited:
Bro, how is something obsolete without having been succeeded by something newer and better?
Because it assumes that one person’s “royal family” have birthright superiority over the rest. It’s a form of Aryanism. Isn’t the world already divided enough?
 
Last edited:
Because it assumes that one person’s “royal family” have birthright superiority over the rest.
That doesn't prove that it's obsolete though. All you are suggesting is that the modern money/social connection politics are inherently superior yet you complain about them constantly.
 
With a good King a monarchy is the greatest form of government. With a bad King it is the worst form.
You ever read Herbert? Sci fi but the political and socioeconomic aspects are truly next level….
 
Back
Top