Drone Solution

[Wizard of Ozz]

Here's my solution:

Barret .50 cal... point at drone, then pull trigger.

 

[acceptance]

Here's my solution:

Barret .50 cal... point at drone, then pull trigger.

Bad idea. The government obviously wants these drones there or they'd shoot them down themselves.

 

[Wizard of Ozz]

Bad idea. The government obviously wants these drones there or they'd shoot them down themselves.

... or maybe they already tried...

 

[Floyd Eye]

Here's my solution:

Barret .50 cal... point at drone, then pull trigger.

That's kinda like shooting skeet with a .22. I got a buddy who can do that very successfully. If I were to try to shoot a drone out of the sky with a rifle I would want something light and fast. One of the 5.56 ARs. I'd rather have a 12 gauge loaded with 16 pellet 00B.

 

[Wizard of Ozz]

That's kinda like shooting skeet with a .22. I got a buddy who can do that very successfully. If I were to try to shoot a drone out of the sky with a rifle I would want something light and fast. One of the 5.56 ARs. I'd rather have a 12 gauge loaded with 16 pellet 00B.

They won’t have the range to hit it. Smallest I’d go is .300 WinMag.

 

[Floyd Eye]

They won’t have the range to hit it. Smallest I’d go is .300 WinMag.

Shouldering a .300 WinMag, pointing it at an object up in the sky, leading the target and hitting it is a pretty tall order man.

 

[Wetordry]

Where's Waldo?

 

[Wizard of Ozz]

Shouldering a .300 WinMag, pointing it at an object up in the sky, leading the target and hitting it is a pretty tall order man.

That's what the bipod on the front is for. Position on a car roof with some sand bags.

... but it most definitely can be shoulder fired... but that is not what is was designed for. Bye bye drone.







... mine has the Proof Research Carbon Fiber Barrel.

 

[Geo]

I am guessing that it's an intimidation tactic for the deep state to have more freedom with drone use.

Is it for them to somehow still spy on DT after they are all fired?

I can say one thing with certainty, what ever this scumbag says we need, the opposite is true.

 

[Wizard of Ozz]

I am guessing that it's an intimidation tactic for the deep state to have more freedom with drone use.

Is it for them to somehow still spy on DT after they are all fired?

I can say one thing with certainty, what ever this scumbag says we need, the opposite is true.

... just like the border and all the illegals... right Alex.

 

[acceptance]

I am guessing that it's an intimidation tactic for the deep state to have more freedom with drone use.

Is it for them to somehow still spy on DT after they are all fired?

I can say one thing with certainty, what ever this scumbag says we need, the opposite is true.

Sounds like they are looking for legislation to "deal with" the issue. So basically, more drones until government gets more power. They just don't have enough power to deal with these drones you see...

 

[Geo]

 

[311splawndude]

1. I don't feel the US Gov (either current or next) wants to get into a war with Russia.

2. I got in about 2 minutes. Maybe I'll watch the rest later. I personally can't watch much of anything for too long.

But he says, "I don't want to spread miss-information, but here is my 25 minute video

 

[Floyd Eye]

That's what the bipod on the front is for. Position on a car roof with some sand bags.

... but it most definitely can be shoulder fired... but that is not what is was designed for. Bye bye drone.







... mine has the Proof Research Carbon Fiber Barrel.

You'll need a little time to get all that set up. Unless you know the drone is coming you're gonna be better off with a lighter rifle you can fire more rapidly and accurately.

 

[Bloodrock]

The powers that be know exactly what these are and what they're doing or they'd have been obliterated by now.

 

[billsbigego]

Was pounding beers last night and saw 3 of them in the sky. Whoop dee doo.
If someone did shoot one down, how are they going to catch the person anyhow? Especially if you were in the woods.

 

[Totally Bored]

I am guessing that it's an intimidation tactic for the deep state to have more freedom with drone use.

Is it for them to somehow still spy on DT after they are all fired?

I can say one thing with certainty, what ever this scumbag says we need, the opposite is true.

So did I get this right ?

He's saying our own government can't do anything about the drones unless Congress makes a law saying the government can do something about it ?

Thats fucked up

 

[acceptance]

So did I get this right ?

He's saying our own government can't do anything about the drones unless Congress makes a law saying the government can do something about it ?

Thats fucked up

He was vague about what the legislation would say, but now the idea is sold to the public that we "need more legislation" in order to deal with this threat... It's the same old story: "Problem-reaction-solution"

 

[Totally Bored]

He was vague about what the legislation would say, but now the idea is sold to the public that we "need more legislation" in order to deal with this threat... It's the same old story: "Problem-reaction-solution"

This Biden Administration is so fucked up

 

[Geo]