M
Mercury25
Member
Which one would you choose (or keep) and why?
Which one do you think works better live with 2 guitarists?
Thanks!
Which one do you think works better live with 2 guitarists?
Thanks!
bstaley":33azy2o9 said:EG5 definitely. The ERect is a cool sound and one I wouldn't want to give up but to an extent it is one dimensional. The EG5 on the other hand can be dialed in for a wide range of tones from 80's hairband stuff to death metal and in between. I've even gotten some really nice tones by rolling the gain way back. If I had to pick one it would be the EG5 definitely.
In a two guitarist situation the EG5 will cut like no other.
Mercury25":17h6cjeu said:Which one would you choose (or keep) and why?
Which one do you think works better live with 2 guitarists?
Thanks!
Mercury25":12y4twfa said:Thanks for all the replies!
You all pretty much told me what I expected to hear---The EG5 just flat-out ROCKS!
The other guitarist plays a Mesa Nomad, mostly clean with pedals like the OCD, Zen Drive, Timmy etc.
However, he is looking at a Bogner Shiva, so that could make things interesting...
Thanks again,
Tim
Godfail":qrzf44q2 said:I wouldn't say the ERECT sounds exactly like a Rectifier...and I would describe it as thick rhythm tones and midrange heavy lead tones, much like the EG5. It's when I compare the two side by side that I realize how valuable the ERECT is.
AdamB":up13gvr0 said:Yeah, rectifiers get a bad rep because a lot of modern bands dial in, bass 10, mids 0, treble 10!
I love my Erect, it's my favourite module so far, i have the mids on 7 on mine as my pickup is a passive hand made high output version based on a EMG 81 (sound much better though). So i need to boost the mids a bit to get them to stand out a little more.
Everyone needs mids, FACT!!!