Evil Joe - FET vs Tube Gain Staging

  • Thread starter Thread starter Meeotch
  • Start date Start date
Meeotch

Meeotch

Well-known member
I've been reading up a bit on FET vs tube for gain staging at the amp's input, and it is a really interesting topic. I'm wondering if Jason and/or someone with some tech knowledge could chime in on how a builder might come to the decision to use FET in this regard. There seems to be more talk about it in the context of microphones, as well as acoustic guitar/piezo applications. With a guitar tube amp, it seems like FET can provide even more gain, lower noise, and possibly a more clinical "attack". That being said, it is less common than just going all tube and so I'm curious about this. Thanks!
 
The production EJ is of course inherited from the custom amp that I did for Joe Barresi, and that one off amp has the switchable FET first stage in it. The idea behind it is to include a shaped mid boost into the front end to gain up and even further tighen up the amp in the same way you might with a pedal - however of course the high voltage MOSFET is on a 250vdc supply rather than a 9 or 18 that you might have in a pedal. More gain, more dynamic. It's a 3 stage deisgn without the F.T.G. boost engaged and 4 stages with it.

#FTG

FTG.jpg
 
Great info, so is it accurate to say an advantage of the FET boost is that it can be shaped (i.e. mid hump) vs a tube stage that can't be shaped? I understand that the high voltage circuit provides more dynamics compared to a pedal out front, just curious about advantages/disadvantages of FET vs tube.
 
Back
Top