For groomers only!

  • Thread starter Thread starter BesaMoogie
  • Start date Start date
Stripped Rights said:
Because senseless bigotry of all types is what progressives find distasteful. Things that should obviously be shut down. Bigots that spread hate don't deserve equal treatment or freedom to speak their bullshit ideas.
Click to expand...
Nope. That is not freedom of speech and no one named you (or the left at large) moral arbiters of what is or is not moral. That is a self-assigned role, so it is meaningless.

Based on the definition of bigotry, seems you and your ilk are just as bigoted as those you choose to attack:

bigot

bĭg′ət

noun​

  1. One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ.
  2. . A hypocritical professor of religion; a hypocrite; also, a superstitious adherent of religion.
  3. A person who is obstinately and unreasonably wedded to a particular religious or other creed, opinion, practice, or ritual; a person who is illiberally attached to any opinion, system of belief, or party organization; an intolerant dogmatist.
Damn it is a bitch when people actually refer to definitions and you aren’t left to move the goal posts by giving words false meanings.
 
Clig Herdunkachuk said:
Nope. That is not freedom of speech and no one named you (or the left at large) moral arbiters of what is or is not moral. That is a self-assigned role, so it is meaningless.

Based on the definition of bigotry, seems you and your ilk are just as bigoted as those you choose to attack:

bigot

bĭg′ət

noun​

  1. One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ.
  2. . A hypocritical professor of religion; a hypocrite; also, a superstitious adherent of religion.
  3. A person who is obstinately and unreasonably wedded to a particular religious or other creed, opinion, practice, or ritual; a person who is illiberally attached to any opinion, system of belief, or party organization; an intolerant dogmatist.
Click to expand...
AFAIK bigotry and hate speech isn't protected by FoS and for obvious reasons. Luckily you (or the right at large) are going extinct and people that are more accepting are the majority. :)
 
Look, you have decided to parrot liberal talking points without actually knowing the meaning of the words you have chose to use. That is a “you“ problem not a “me” problem.

I know you didn’t think you were saying what you actually said when you used the word “bigot”. In your world, these words have been hijacked and weaponized.

To the rest of the english speaking world what you said looped in religion, race, politics and an intolerance of differing viewpoints.

In your world, you merely uttered a magical incantation that signals membership and belonging in leftist circles.

You are intolerant of differening view points on race, religion, and politics ergo you too are a “bigot”

The word you are looking for is “discriminatory”. Discriminatory conduct is not protected. Bigotted conduct (a strongly held belief that others may disagree with) is precisely what the first amendment seeks to protect and allow.
 
Last edited:
Clig Herdunkachuk said:
Look, you have decided to parrot liberal (conservative in your case) talking points without actually knowing the meaning of the words you have been given. That is a “you“ problem not a “me” problem.
Click to expand...
Typical projection.
Clig Herdunkachuk said:
I know you didn’t think you were saying what you actually said when you used the word “bigot”. In your world, these words have been hijacked and weaponized.
Click to expand...
Lol
Clig Herdunkachuk said:
To the rest of the english speaking world what you said looped in religion, race, politics and an intolerance of differing viewpoints.
Click to expand...
What post are you referring to?
Clig Herdunkachuk said:
In your word, you merely uttered a magical incantation that signals membership and belonging in leftist circles.

You are intollerant of differening view points on race, religion, and politics ergo you too are a “bigot”

The word you are looking for is “discriminatory”. Discriminatory conduct is not protected. Bigotted conduct (a strongly held belief that others may disagree with) is precisely what the first amendment seeks to protect and allow.
Click to expand...
Fuck discriminatory bigots. :)
 
Stripped Rights said:
AFAIK bigotry and hate speech isn't protected by FoS and for obvious reasons. Luckily you (or the right at large) are going extinct and people that are more accepting are the majority. :)
Click to expand...
You really do live a fantasy.

Fact. In the USA roughly 34% of registered voters are democrat, Roughly 33% are republican.

The rest of us… roughly 33% are independents and we really dislike both parties. The swing in elections is the independents choosing between the shit sandwich or diahrrhea soup that the partiisan system serves up.

There may be localized variations (e.g. California is liberal, Florida is conservative), but the numbers above reflect the political distribution of the entire US.

There is no liberal or conservative revivial going on. These number have held steady for decades with very insignificant (~1%) statiscal shifts, All you really are seeing is independents holding their nose and picking the lesser of evils.

Independents tend to vote against things not for things. So Joe Biden’s win (thanks to independent voters) was not a mass endorsement of liberal ideology by independents, it was a rebuke to Trump and the zaniness of his first term.

FWIW, polls are finding Independents are not happy with Biden. Uh oh.
 
Last edited:
PLX said:
What's really scary is that you're some sort of school teacher.

:poop:
Click to expand...
Yep, coming on 20 years now.
Mainly Senior Humanities (History, Geography, Global Politics) with some Senior English, Psychology and Music Industry.

Had so many kids come through who were the product of backwards, regressive alpha wannabes like yourself and who their final year happy, confident in themselves with the grades they needed to get into tertiary studies.

What’s even better is when you catch up with them 10 years odd down the track and they’ve got secure jobs, relationships and started having kids of their own which they will bring up to be forward thinking, accepting, successful and positive people themselves.

Nothing better than seeing intolerant simple minded fucks being bred out of society. I’m in it for the long game.
 
jdel77 said:
Yep, coming on 20 years now.
Mainly Senior Humanities (History, Geography, Global Politics) with some Senior English, Psychology and Music Industry.

Had so many kids come through who were the product of backwards, regressive alpha wannabes like yourself and who their final year happy, confident in themselves with the grades they needed to get into tertiary studies.

What’s even better is when you catch up with them 10 years odd down the track and they’ve got secure jobs, relationships and started having kids of their own which they will bring up to be forward thinking, accepting, successful and positive people themselves.

Nothing better than seeing intolerant simple minded fucks being bred out of society. I’m in it for the long game.
Click to expand...
What'd you come up with on that "illegal grooming" ?

Still looking ?

:ROFLMAO:
 
marvcus said:
There is no such thing as “hate speech.” Made up phrase by a certain side to try to frame or box in others to their argument landscape.
Click to expand...
What would you call it if someone is spreading hateful bullshit towards your own race?
 
marvcus said:
30,000 foot view here
Click to expand...
That sounds about right..

giphy.gif
 
Stripped Rights said:
What would you call it if someone is spreading hateful bullshit towards your own race?
Click to expand...
Free speech. Doesnt mean it is right, I may not agree with it. But who decides what is “hate speech”? And how? Do a handful of NYT and CNN “journalists” get to pick? Is there a committee? A vote? Is anyone better than another who gets to decide?

A jerk is a jerk and people say stupid things.
 
marvcus said:
Free speech. Doesnt mean it is right, I may not agree with it. But who decides what is “hate speech”? And how? Do a handful of NYT and CNN “journalists” get to pick? Is there a committee? A vote? Is anyone better than another who gets to decide?

A jerk is a jerk and people say stupid things.
Click to expand...
You're making a whole lotta sense.

:unsure:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top