G
gibsonash
Active member
I agree with all that said before but go for FM9 not FM3 and don t look back . My 2cts
This is how I feel, I was real tempted by the most recent neural pedal that everyone else hates, since I’m most interested in capturing my own amps and that’s it.ToneX needs a device that can make the captures itself imho, even if the process takes a long time. I went with the QC simply because I didn't have to also buy an interface and a newer computer to run it with.
I agree with all that said before but go for FM9 not FM3 and don t look back . My 2cts
This is how I feel, I was real tempted by the most recent neural pedal that everyone else hates, since I’m most interested in capturing my own amps and that’s it.
I might still get one in the future but I kinda would prefer tonex or nam, but also just can’t be bothered buying additional external gear and learning how to set it up right.
Reading the recent posts in the nam thread on tgp reminds me of one time I installed Linux on an old laptop and spent 80% of my time troubleshooting and configuring things, and reading Linux forum posts I didn’t understand.
With ToneX you can capture with any interface, but they do make a little capture box you can use to make it easier.This is how I feel, I was real tempted by the most recent neural pedal that everyone else hates, since I’m most interested in capturing my own amps and that’s it.
I might still get one in the future but I kinda would prefer tonex or nam, but also just can’t be bothered buying additional external gear and learning how to set it up right.
Reading the recent posts in the nam thread on tgp reminds me of one time I installed Linux on an old laptop and spent 80% of my time troubleshooting and configuring things, and reading Linux forum posts I didn’t understand.
Yeah the computer is my issues with ToneX. I only use one for work, not a video game guy and not an uber recording guy. So I'd have to invest in a separate computer to really use ToneX. The Neural stuff can do it within the unit and seems pretty cool but kinda noisy.With ToneX you can capture with any interface, but they do make a little capture box you can use to make it easier.
I liked the ToneX/Amplitube stuff so much I went ahead and bought an Axe I/O interface. I needed a new interface anyways, and this one is made for guitar players. It also has a reamp jack, so I can use that to easily make captures. I plan on capturing my own amps once I get a new computer, which was a plan anyways. I tried with my laptop and it took 6 hours to do a normal capture, so I am sure advanced would take like a week.
Yeah, the ToneX is pretty much useless without a computer.Yeah the computer is my issues with ToneX. I only use one for work, not a video game guy and not an uber recording guy. So I'd have to invest in a separate computer to really use ToneX. The Neural stuff can do it within the unit and seems pretty cool but kinda noisy.
Just for home you ll be fine with FM3 . For professional use FM9 get all you need . Complex routing , power , 2 amps at the same time etc ... Works very well in 4CM application and you get a lot switches as a midi controller . You can mimick all the amps of the planet if you have the real ones .hey could you expand on this a bit please? i have an FM3 but i'm just playing at home for fun. What does the FM9 add from a utility perspective? More beneficial for playing live?
Just for home you ll be fine with FM3 . For professional use FM9 get all you need . Complex routing , power , 2 amps at the same time etc ... Works very well in 4CM application and you get a lot switches as a midi controller . You can mimick all the amps of the planet if you have the real ones .