yngzaklynch
New member
What are your general thoughts on Daves amps? Strengths and weaknesses
5150clone":37qvfrj5 said:I bought one and sold it 3 weeks later. Different strokes for different folks.
keennay":1cw5ctf9 said:5150clone":1cw5ctf9 said:I bought one and sold it 3 weeks later. Different strokes for different folks.
Just curious, which 'one'? There are several Friedman products.
If we're counting the Brad King/Tone Merchants/Cameron Amplification line, I'll never sell my Atomica.
uglyfuzzface":1rlpjir4 said:I love my be 100 , it's slightly darker and smoother than a Marshall but still has that flavour to it if that's your thing . Only thing I wasn't happy about what the lack of a second master volume for lead boosts .
bbaug14":1nn4s3ao said:uglyfuzzface":1nn4s3ao said:I love my be 100 , it's slightly darker and smoother than a Marshall but still has that flavour to it if that's your thing . Only thing I wasn't happy about what the lack of a second master volume for lead boosts .
After owning many amps that have this feature (including the Peters I currently own), I greatly prefer a good EQ in the loop over a second master. Dial in not only a volume bump, but also a gain bump to get a little more sustain and ease in the feel. Also address any EQ concerns going from rhythm lines to lead lines.
Where the second master does work for me is matching the clean output to distorted outputs more easily.
suhrimmetal":1dtlz40v said:I think Dave is a genius... and a great guy to boot. He knows his shit and puts out GREAT amps! I can't afford to play them anymore these days.... but I would take any of his line in a 2nd and not look back.