ob1clyde
Member
Since nobody here mentioned this i figure id chime in.. This amp loves the fryette P50's in particular a fatbottom cab if possible, I also tried it with a Mesa OS cab and Engl pro 2x12 with V30s.
At the time i owned this amp i also had a MarkV and an Engl Invader. I classified them this way: Sig was like an Old HOTROD Camaro- cool well built, solid does what it does best in a straight line. MarkV- was a bit more like a Dodge Viper, high tech power hungry, american made with nice creature comforts, The Engl.. Like a nice Porsche, shiny and smooth with options up the A++.
Ultimately, unable to decide I let the market dictate which I'd keep.. MarkV sold first, then the Engl (probably due to the price tag)was next and when I was left with the Sig, I accepted it as my own. Paired with its Fatbottom, A nice rig in its own right.
There was one problem.. the clean channel. It does NOT match output with either of the other two channels. If you try, you get the gain introduction and then it is no longer the clean channel. I researched this and what I found was that others also had an issue with this. Fryette said the circuit was designed that way, because guitar players dont use their volume knob anymore// Steve was making us play the way he wanted to.. roll the knob down he says.. ok but what about when i go right back to my rhythm metal tone? Its the same problem, now im quickly rolling the volume back up, so my output is right for the other channel.. In the end you had to play the amp at such a low level to get unity gain on all channels, that you ended up missing out on the power section that made the lead channels so good.. Frustrating. I suppose that if you primarily play one channel its fine. On a side note i also read that some had resorted to tuning the gain all the way down on channel 2 and basically trying to flip 1&2 in order to have a matching signal level with channel three lead.. But, thats not what I wanted my signature amp to do, so i moved on. Great build quality, slow email response.. tough to get on the phone for sure..(i needed handle) But a unique voice for sure..
At the time i owned this amp i also had a MarkV and an Engl Invader. I classified them this way: Sig was like an Old HOTROD Camaro- cool well built, solid does what it does best in a straight line. MarkV- was a bit more like a Dodge Viper, high tech power hungry, american made with nice creature comforts, The Engl.. Like a nice Porsche, shiny and smooth with options up the A++.
Ultimately, unable to decide I let the market dictate which I'd keep.. MarkV sold first, then the Engl (probably due to the price tag)was next and when I was left with the Sig, I accepted it as my own. Paired with its Fatbottom, A nice rig in its own right.
There was one problem.. the clean channel. It does NOT match output with either of the other two channels. If you try, you get the gain introduction and then it is no longer the clean channel. I researched this and what I found was that others also had an issue with this. Fryette said the circuit was designed that way, because guitar players dont use their volume knob anymore// Steve was making us play the way he wanted to.. roll the knob down he says.. ok but what about when i go right back to my rhythm metal tone? Its the same problem, now im quickly rolling the volume back up, so my output is right for the other channel.. In the end you had to play the amp at such a low level to get unity gain on all channels, that you ended up missing out on the power section that made the lead channels so good.. Frustrating. I suppose that if you primarily play one channel its fine. On a side note i also read that some had resorted to tuning the gain all the way down on channel 2 and basically trying to flip 1&2 in order to have a matching signal level with channel three lead.. But, thats not what I wanted my signature amp to do, so i moved on. Great build quality, slow email response.. tough to get on the phone for sure..(i needed handle) But a unique voice for sure..