
Shask
Well-known member
When I weighed all mine, they are all around 7.5 pounds. I guess I have a type, lol. If I pick up a guitar and it is heavier I put it right back down. I specifically look for lighter versions of the models I want.
Mahogany, or what is sometimes sold as mahogany, can have very different weights. Gibson and Fender were both selling very heavy guitars in the seventies.That LP is weight relieved.
My Norlins are well north of 11lbs with no weight relief. They’re fucking heavy lol
Gibson Les Paul Modern 8.2 lbs.
The Gibson page for this guitar says "ultra modern" under the weight relief section but doesn't describe what this means.
So I'm not sure if it's chambering, or special sorting for lighter mohagany slabs, or what other method.
8.2 lbs
View attachment 398356
Gibson ultra modern weight relief:
![]()
8lbs seems midrange to my old body...
But lightest? My Suhr Custom Classic HSS
View attachment 398318
I don't think for me there is a direct correlation with weight and tone. Only reason I care about weight is I don't want my shoulder or back to hurt after a long time playing live, otherwise it wouldn't matter to me. And with bass I have no options, both my jazz bass and MM sterling 5 are 10lbs, is what it is with bass.I think the whole "heavier is better" approach to choosing a guitar is dated, and doesn't usually hold true. At least in my experience. My three best-sounding guitars I've owned have been light or light-ish at least.
That being said, I don't particularly seek a light guitar. Otherwise, I'd just be playing Strandbergs or whatever. I like my Les Pauls, but I'm also not in love with the couple of Norlins I've tried. I'd love to be proven wrong by the right one, though.
I also prefer lightweight bridges and tuners.
Had there been an argument presented like "Heavy guitars sound better" then maybe.....This thread belongs at TGP...