Great news for all the lefties…

  • Thread starter Thread starter Picasso
  • Start date Start date
watson503 said:
Page 6:
https://icj2.wpenginepowered.com/wp...ciples-FINAL-printer-version-1-MARCH-2023.pdf
The Principles are based on general principles of criminal law and international
human rights law and standards. They seek to offer a clear, accessible and workable
legal framework – as well as practical legal guidance – on applying the criminal law
to conduct associated with:
sexual and reproductive health and rights, including termination of pregnancy;
consensual sexual activities, including in contexts such as sex outside marriage,
same-sex sexual relations, adolescent sexual activity and sex work;
gender identity and gender expression;
HIV non-disclosure, exposure or transmission;
drug use and the possession of drugs for personal use; and
homelessness and poverty.
Click to expand...
I see it said adolescent sexual activity. Someone show me where is says adult-child sexual activity?
 
watson503 said:
So something that has been going on recently is we have been seeing a push to give power to adolescents in which if they give consent then sex with a person of any age should be considered "ok" which works in conjunction with what you see in the above. If P is now added to the string of LGBTQetc, these people can't be witheld from expressing and acting on their sexual orientation is what this is moving towards.
Click to expand...
That is certainly one opinion on it, but it is not mine. This document covers a lot of ground and to thumb is at pro “P” propaganda is misguided imo
 
watson503 said:
Does it need to? If one person involved is an adolescent is that not "adolescent sexual activity"?
Click to expand...
To me it mirror’s principle 11 saying that if 2 people over the age of 18 having sex isn’t “criminal”, then 2 people under the age of 18 having sex shouldn’t be considered “criminal” either
 
I don’t love posting my own conjectures, but I believe the push to ban abortions is what is causing many to push this document through asap. It set a precedent to remove people’s rights and this is an attempt to stop that
 
Aynirar27 said:
To me it mirror’s principle 11 saying that if 2 people over the age of 18 having sex isn’t “criminal”, then 2 people under the age of 18 having sex shouldn’t be considered “criminal” either
Click to expand...
It's not illegal for two consenting people under the age of 18 to have sex.
Edit: Unless you're talking about a 16 year old preying on a 5 year old type situation.
 
Aynirar27 said:
I don’t love posting my own conjectures, but I believe the push to ban abortions is what is causing many to push this document through asap. It set a precedent to remove people’s rights and this is an attempt to stop that
Click to expand...
You don't think it should be up to each individual state?
 
Beigelemon said:
You're the Maoist so you tell us. You really do believe any old hokum.
Click to expand...
I’m sure you are a staunch supporter of pedophilia Donlemon. Funny how you beta-males pretend to have balls when you leave that TGP place. Sounds like a total fag hangout.
 
New Guy said:
Uttered by Picasso every morning:

“If I call everyone a pedophile, no one will ever suspect me of me being a kiddie-rapist. I’m so smart”.
Click to expand...
Wow. You really cracked that case, detective :LOL:
OIP.-urwUQsxo9xqs_RuhACvzgHaFU
 
Findthetone1 said:
It's not illegal for two consenting people under the age of 18 to have sex.
Edit: Unless you're talking about a 16 year old preying on a 5 year old type situation.
Click to expand...
abortions weren't illegal a year ago either. if Roe v Wade was overturned, so could Lawrence v Texas, and thus criminalizing gay sex. Like is said before, a precedent was set and now things need protection now that didn't before.
 
Picasso said:
I’m sure you are a staunch supporter of pedophilia Donlemon. Funny how you beta-males pretend to have balls when you leave that TGP place. Sounds like a total fag hangout.
Click to expand...
Is that all you got, the same tired, crude insults? Can't you think originally? Go on, try! Say something different. Break free!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top