Guitar EQ

  • Thread starter Thread starter alund
  • Start date Start date
alund

alund

Well-known member
Boatloads of eq’s out there. I have 2, one with a dB gain and one without which seems to be the only difference. Few more sliders here and there which can add a little more hiss/noise, bottom end, bring up mids….Which eq’s on the market are notoriously good ? And does it depend on the amp being used? Or are there standouts for players ?
 
no idea how others feel about it but I love the MXR 10 band.
 
The boss advanced eq 10 band from the 2000s is still my favorite. Really good . And the s’mores Para eq is the other. I’ve bought so many iv lost count but these 2 were the keepers
 
It does depend on what styles you use them for imo. For Graphic EQ pedals the ones I’ve kept have been a vintage blue MXR 10 band, Boss GE-10, Ibanez GE-601 and ‘70’s Big Jam SE-6. These are all vintage pedals and so have a more inherently organic and warm color to their sound where 99.9% of recent pedals will color the tone with a more sterile, bland somewhat filtered flavored (a few exceptions)

The Ibanez has better quality tone in the midrange, but not as much range as the others or as good in the lows or highs as the MXR or Boss. The Boss sounds the most powerful and punchy and has the most range to shape the eq, but the tone itself is not as good or organic. The MXR blue is a good middle ground of the 2. The Big Jam has the most inherent warmth and maybe more organic, but is always to me inherently dark and soft sounding. I only use it for cleans, but it can be excellent

Then you have PQ’s that I use more like an od pedal to boosts. Best ones IME are a ‘70’s Furman PQ3 (green panel/silver knobs, Audio Arts 4100, and Intersound PRV-1, these are all rack units. Haven’t found yet a pq pedal that’s half as good unfortunately. The Empress PQ especially I was disappointed in. Very clinical/cold sounding with ugly tonal artifacts around the notes

Many of the stuff I recommended can be noisy, but in terms of tone quality they’ve been the ones I liked most so far and I can manage it. For whatever reason a lot of pedals with less noise tend to also have more filtered, worse tone
 
Last edited:
TL;DR version: vintage Boss GE-10, blue MXR, Ibanez GE-601
 
I like a GE-7 to boost the mids and overall signal a bit in front of the amp. In my loop, something with more and narrower bands so I can do more intricate shaping there.
 
The Boss EQ didn't work for me--when I used it to lower levels (to emulate rolling down the volume on my guitar) it was too noisy. Lately I've had the ThorpyFx Team Medic on my board which acts like an EQ and as a boost. Killer in front of a breathing Marshall or Friedman.
 
The Boss EQ didn't work for me--when I used it to lower levels (to emulate rolling down the volume on my guitar) it was too noisy. Lately I've had the ThorpyFx Team Medic on my board which acts like an EQ and as a boost. Killer in front of a breathing Marshall or Friedman.
Thorpy makes great stuff! I might have to check out the Team Medic. It’s not on their website anymore though, so will have to find a used one. I’ve had 5 different Thorpy’s and they seem to be among the very few recent made pedals I’ve tried with an organic, good tone similar to vintage pedals, but maybe more hi-fi in some ways
 
SineEffect MegaPara is a good one

iat9ovydbxchnrqcnpuu.jpg
 
My favorite pre EQ's:
  • Boss GE-7
  • Peppers Dirty Tree (some people think this is a standard overdrive pedal but it's not. It's a 2-band EQ pedal with a level control)
My favorite loop EQ's:
  • Master Effects EQFH
  • Mesa 5-band GEQ
  • MXR 10-band GEQ
 
Last edited:
Source Audio EQ2 - seven bands and you can store four presets.
 
Really depends if you're going in the loop, or upfront.. I really dig the Wampler EQuator in front of a boost, MXR in the loop.
 
Really depends if you're going in the loop, or upfront.. I really dig the Wampler EQuator in front of a boost, MXR in the loop.
I see a recurring theme. What is the reason one is better up front vs loop? This is where I get lost in electronics. Why? I assume components used do better with certain circuits; matched better maybe….
 
I see a recurring theme. What is the reason one is better up front vs loop? This is where I get lost in electronics. Why? I assume components used do better with certain circuits; matched better maybe….
Nose and ease of use, I'm guessing.
 
I want something that gives me an instaboner like kicking the eq in on a mark iv….
 
Back
Top