
scottosan
Well-known member
I picked one up today I don't like many of the stock profiles. There's a shit ton of profiles on tone.net, you have to sort through the popular ones. Getting in dialed in finally.
Yeah, I didn't really like any of the stock profiles, but I started profiling my own gear and it's incredibly accurate. Planning on doing it with a few more pieces and then selling them off. It'll be nice to have all the amps I like dialed in exactly how I like them in one small box. Also don't have to worry about whether I want to bother taking the time to record with a real amp or just use a plugin for convenience, now I have a plugin with all my amp in it, already. Got the pedal coming on Wednesday and I'm curious to see how it fairs through my PS-1 and into an actual cab.I picked one up today I don't like many of the stock profiles. There's a shit ton of profiles on tone.net, you have to sort through the popular ones. Getting in dialed in finally.
So far, I don't like it through my FX return with cab sim offYeah, I didn't really like any of the stock profiles, but I started profiling my own gear and it's incredibly accurate. Planning on doing it with a few more pieces and then selling them off. It'll be nice to have all the amps I like dialed in exactly how I like them in one small box. Also don't have to worry about whether I want to bother taking the time to record with a real amp or just use a plugin for convenience, now I have a plugin with all my amp in it, already. Got the pedal coming on Wednesday and I'm curious to see how it fairs through my PS-1 and into an actual cab.
I'll give that a try today. Makes sense though since most profiles have a cab as part of them and they're a single profile. What's to most inexpensive way to make your own profile?Try DI profiles. The cab separation algorithm sucks
Ok, whew!Okay nowDI profiles with no cabs is a game changer into my FX loop of my CCV clone. Since I have a 3 way depth voicing and a 3 way NFB switch, I can pretty much tailor the power sections.
Directs are the way to go, but effects return would be better captured on the effect send.So far, I don't like it through my FX return with cab sim off
Directs are the way to go, but effects return would be better captured on the effect send.
I'll probably get a cheap mono amp at some point, I just don't want to spend much
Any suggestions?There are some decent cheap amps out there. I'd go class D personally.
Tc electronics bam200 would be a good place to start. It's a bass amp bit set right it is flat. I hear you want to be careful with the speaker jack cover as it is possible to short it though I don't have personal experience. Rubber covered speaker cables would solve this issue.Any suggestions?
Just try it yourself.
at the dude who thinks IK Multimedia banned him from the forum that will ban you for farting while taking a shit in your own home.
I gotta hand it to Pete from IK who has been handling the forums, TGP is one place where you know you’re going to have combative members, but he got the 3rd degree from a couple on my forum as well and the dude just keeps trudging along doing his job the best he can. Can’t say I feel particularly bad when someone gets led by YouTubers/doesn’t fully understand a product and thinks the best way to get results is by acting like a cunt on a forum to the guy who doesn’t actually fix shit or make decisions.
It's just that you seem to miss that most advanced maths have a lot of variables.
The idea behind machine learning is literally to have the computer tweak millions of variables so in essence each profile is incredibly different to the next.
While the USB interface is the way to go for recording, I'm really impressed with the DI profiles (no cab) going directly into my FX loop. MkV clean and 2C+. These are with zero tweaks to any parameters. Sounds yuuuuge.