Issues Getting Good Sound Boogie Mark V 90 Watt

  • Thread starter Thread starter Charvel1975
  • Start date Start date
Not a bad amp, but not a great amp IMO, at least that was my experience. Really nice clean tones and ch2 crunch was a great mid to high gain rythm tone. Ch3, the high gain Mark channel, was a disappointment to me. It was definitely very tight, but I found it brittle and anemic. It just didn't have the balls and rawness my old mk4 had or the Mk3's I had played did. It also didn't feel as good to play leads on either.

Off it went. Thinking about it, if my old mk4 had the mk5's "crunch" channel for its ryth2/channel 2, it would have been about the perfect Mark for me!
 
Welcome to the wonder that is dialing in the MKV ?

While it sounds preposterous, adding an additional EQ in the loop will solve your troubles. The amp has excessive mids that are hard to dial out if it’s not what you are looking for. You need an additional EQ to cut it out even lower.

MkIV and Extreme mode are your go to’s for high gain. Don’t expect a walloping punch in IIC+ mode. It’s ultra tight and compact sounding, especially in tetrode mode. Stay in Pentode mode.
 
My suggestion with that amp is to actually read the manual. I got a Mark IV a while back and couldn't make heads or tails of it. I finally sat down with the manual, and walked away feeling like I didn't know how amps worked before. They aren't intuitive, and I did everything wrong. I used the manual as a starting point, and I got close. That amp needed work, so I flipped it.

Now with my Mark V, I get good tones out of it, because I know how they work. Seriously, read the manual. It will unlock that amp for you.
 
How old is the cab? Have you broken in the speakers?

I find that's often the reason with people's negative experience with a lot of amps - a bad cab, or one that hasn't been broken in.
 
MkIV and Extreme mode are your go to’s for high gain. Don’t expect a walloping punch in IIC+ mode. It’s ultra tight and compact sounding, especially in tetrode mode. Stay in Pentode mode.
My experiences exactly with the V:25 (save the tetrode/pentode of course).
The IIC+ mode on that is more Santana than Metallica and far too lean.

I live on the Xtreme mode in CH2, and occasionally, for that aggressive, super tight late 80's, early 90's (think Nuclear Assault, Overkill and Megadeth's RIP tones) I switch to the tighter and more aggressive sounding IV mode. Xtreme has less gain, but sounds bigger and bolder.
 
Here's what I think. I owned a Mark V for 5 years, a Mark V 25 for 2 years, a Dual Rect for 4 years, a Lonestar Special for 2 years, an Express 5:50 and 25 for 2 years, an Electradyne for 3 years, and a Roadster for 6 years. I owned some others, like a Mark IV and Mark IIC+ that I bought and sold along the way. I still use Mesa Black Shadow speakers in my main cab. Still, I don't consider myself a Mesa Boogie guy, and definitely no expert. However, I can tell you what the raw deal is.
First, when it comes to the Mark V, a lot of what you hear is basically opinionated crap as far as I'm concerned. When you say you can't get a good tone out of it, that raises some flags because it's hard not to get a good tone out of one. MOST of the time when people say that, it's because they had very particular expectations OR expected it to adapt to their particular instruments/speakers/etc. For example, if a guy is using high-output ceramic pickups, drop-tuned, and whatever effects, then plugs into a Mesa and dials the controls at 12:00, he's going to be very disappointed. Mesa Boogies do not have the same kind of tone network as a Marshall or Bogner. Plus, he'd be pushing the amp with powerful pickups and adding drives or effects and it's not all some easy plug & play deal.
The first thing you need to do it plug straight into he amp and dial in some basic sounds, then add everything else one by one - but to do this, you NEED to read the manual! I don't know how many times I heard the same jive only to find out they bough the amp and thought they'd take it home and hook it up like some generic amp as if it's supposed to output magnificent tone on demand. I don't care what amp you use, but if you take it home without considering the uniqueness of an amp's tone, design, and overall presentation, you're just setting yourself up for disappointment.
Metal players are some of the worst when it comes to this. I don't know how many times a Dual Rectifier guy, or Uberschall guy, or Mark IIC+ guy have come along and pissed on the Mark V only to find they had very specific preconceived ideas OR thought it logical to just generalize preconceived notions across amps. The vintage and purist guys are just as bad. I mean Mesa Boogies are not simple circuit amps, and Mesa Boogie amps in the past 2 decades are generally more modern sounding, with the exception of Electradyne, California Tweed, Fillmore, etc. Even those won't have such simple culircuits that you can actually hear the differences between certain brands of caps, etc.
Second, no one with a brain buys a Mark V expecting it to sound exactly like their 80's Mesa rig. No, that's not how it works. The Mark V has the exact amp circuits hardwired but it's still sharing other circuitry and a different global circuit design. You're definitely going to get authentic Mark IIc+ and Mark IV tone but it is a more modern amp and not going to be an exact tonal replica.
Another major stupidity with Mark V gossip has to do with not being able to 'click', or essentially settle with it. What you'll usually find with those guys is they never dial in a few good tones and just start using those tones like they would on a dual-channel amp. You have to find a few good tones, start using them regularly live, recording, and practice. When people don't do that, they lose sight of the amp's utility. It's like having a Swiss pocket knife. Most people use one or 2 blades most of the time, and occasionally the toothpick and scissors. You don't get a Swiss pocket knife and find regular utility for an entire variety of tasks every time you open it. Furthermore, everyone knows if you want a certain kind of knife, you don't buy a Swiss Army knife and expect it to do perfectly what that specific knife does well.
Therefore, a lot of it has to do with the mentality and expectations going into it; as well as what your guitars input to it, effects input through it, and speakers output from it. The fact is, the Mark V oozes great tone because it's an outstanding, quality amp. If someone has more trouble finding good tones from it rather than sorting out which tones they want to mainly use then something is wrong with how they approached it... and the same goes for many amps also.
 
Last edited:
Here's what I think...(long but good rant)
Is that you Randall Smith?? :ROFLMAO:

I'm joking.

You hit on a lot of good points. I've owned mine for almost 2 months now and continue to discover some great tones, especially in channel 2. Its a challenging amp but I'm glad I stuck with it and it sounds phenomenal on recordings. Like I mentioned in my NAD post when I acquired one, I think the biggest issue with this amp that brought it a lot of attention ever since its release is the expectation of that god damn IIC+ mode. If you take that mode out of the equation, you would only hear about 1/4 of the complaints that this amp brings. In fact, 2 of 3 common complaints are in relation the IIC+ mode. The 3rd being the harsh highs the amp can put out depending on your signal chain.

Lets break it down;

Common complaint#1: Amp has lack of balls/no bass
This comment HAS to be coming from folks who went straight to the IIC+ mode and didn't pay much mind to the rest of the amp. The amp has plenty of power, punch and low end on every other mode, in fact in excess on some of the modes which is the culprit of the flubby lows you also hear about. You rarely read on forums specifically which channel/mode the complaints are coming from which leads to a lot of confusion of the amp.

Common complaint#2 IIC+ mode is nothing like the actual amp
Rather than be a dick and say "well, NO SHIT!", what did people actually expect? Its built with newer and updated components, most notably a completely different PT/OT which is the heart of any guitar amplifier. Not to mention, its integrated into a very complex circuit which will also effect the tone. @MistaGuitah I have to disagree with you that you can get an authentic IIC+ tone out of the amp. All Mark series amp have their signature "core" tone, but it doesn't even come close to the depth, humongous punch, feel or ratty highs of the actual amp. I even tried Dougs settings in the manual and sorry, still no dice. The MKIV mode however is at least a lot closer to its claims, minus the sub lows the actual amp puts out. But at least the feel is there, the compression and the unique gain texture is present. The MKIV is a special amp. Its the mean bastard child of the Mark family IMO.

In the end, I feel like it depends on how you approach the amp and what the uses for it will be. Guys who need an amp that can cover a lot of ground, especially those in cover bands who gig a lot and need the ultimate in versatility are happier than a pig in shit with the amp. Others who were wanting a versatile hi gain amp with a snappy and tight low end are also generally very happy. I'm finding its mostly the people who were counting on that IIC+ mode to be an exact replica are the ones who are the most disappointed and disgusted with the amp, followed by others who are new to the Mark series and have no clue what they are diving into.
 
Mesa is one of the few companies that knows how to incorporate great vintage type tones and response out of amps that have a lot of modern features and sounds. It’s what I dig about my Mesa’s. Many focus on the metal side of Mesa’s but miss the great classic old school sounds they”re capable of by setting them certain ways. The MKV does this like no other. Need to start a melo-death band I can take the MKV, start a Foghat tribute band, i can take the MKV, audition for a funk band, try out for a shoe gazer band (but kill me first..lol) etc etc. From AC/DC to Parliament to At The Gates. This amp can do it. I’ve had mine for over 10 years and it didn’t take me long to let the whole IIC+ baggage go and just enjoy it for what it is. A good, rockin’ high gain sound. My favorite high gain sounds are on CH1 and CH 2 though.
 
Common complaint#2 IIC+ mode is nothing like the actual amp
Rather than be a dick and say "well, NO SHIT!", what did people actually expect? Its built with newer and updated components, most notably a completely different PT/OT which is the heart of any guitar amplifier. Not to mention, its integrated into a very complex circuit which will also effect the tone. @MistaGuitah I have to disagree with you that you can get an authentic IIC+ tone out of the amp. All Mark series amp have their signature "core" tone, but it doesn't even come close to the depth, humongous punch, feel or ratty highs of the actual amp. I even tried Dougs settings in the manual and sorry, still no dice. The MKIV mode however is at least a lot closer to its claims, minus the sub lows the actual amp puts out. But at least the feel is there, the compression and the unique gain texture is present. The MKIV is a special amp. Its the mean bastard child of the Mark family IMO.
Actually, what I said was, "The Mark V has the exact amp circuits hardwired but it's still sharing other circuitry and a different global circuit design. You're definitely going to get authentic Mark IIc+ and Mark IV tone but it is a more modern amp and not going to be an exact tonal replica."

Having owned both a IIc+ and IV, I say the Mark V is pretty much the same tone and vibe that I would recognize playing if the channels weren't labeled, but obviously not exact in every nuance. I mean, essentially it's the same exact preamp circuits, 6L6 tubes, going through Mesa Boogie circuitry, so no other amp can get that close.
If Mesa Boogie decided to put out a Synergy preamp module, I don't think it would even be as close to the originals as the Mark V. If someone offered to give me either MARK IIc+ & Mark IV, or a new Mark V, I would take the Mark V. Like I said, having owned both, I think the Mark V is so faithful to them but has more to offer so I prefer it.
To be specific, however, I think the Mark IV is closer in tone than it's IIC+ channel, but feels more like a IIC+ then Mark IV respectively, but these are rather nuance differences. If you recorded a Mark V through an old Mesa Boogie cab, it would sound Eben closer. Either way, you wouldn't be able to tell by hearing only if you're listening to a Mark V or the originals.
In the end, it's MOSTLY a subjective debate. Keep on mind, we haven't even discussed the JPC, but that's a different can of worms... Just talking about this makes me want to go iit and buy a Mark V again. LOL!
 
Some good advice in here, but I will just share my 2 cents, and you may not like it. The amp probably isn't for you. Doesn't mean its not a good amp for others. Sell it and move on.

Bottom line: If it takes that much effort, its probably just an amp you are never going to like. Wish I had saved myself 12 months of heart ache and tried something else sooner. It's a very polarizing amp. You like the sound or you don't. Maybe its different in a mix. I play at home mostly. But I could not dial it in despite over a year of effort (see below).

My story:

I had a Mark V 25, so a touch different, keep that in mind. It was my first tube amp. I thought maybe I was just bad/new at amps and I was doing something wrong. Even considered getting the 90W thinking the 25W was just too small of an amp. It was just so honky as you describe. Through my readings on these pages, I am not the only one that had an experience like this.

I read the manual 3 times. Spent weeks/months on Rig Talk and the Gear Page getting advice on dialing it in. I tried it all. I never got a great sound out of it (other than the Fat Channel which is an AMAZING clean channel). The few times I did get something I liked out of the dirty channels, I'd come back the next day and didn't like it. I liked pedals through the Fat channel better. Even hired a music producer to come out and give me a lesson. He agreed the Deizel Pedal sounded better through the fat channel.

I bought a Diezel VH2 and can't get a bad sound out if it. Sold the Mesa. No regrets. Clean is different but AMZAING as well.

Sell it and move on. Don't waste too much time trying other people's setting or the manuals advice. It will get better but it will never be the sound you are looking for if you don't like it already.
 
You either jive with it or not basically, takes some time to dial shit in.
 
I’ve had a lot of amps . And I’ve realized to give each one some time to get to know it . Try odd settings . Not all amps work the same at all . Mark Vs can be set up awesome but sometimes some amps don’t go with certain cabs . I find Diezel amps to not be a good fit with uberkab. It happens
 
Hello all ? have new Boogie Mark V 90 watt head running through a new Harley Benton G412A cab with Celestion Vintage 30's. Tried other guitarist's Ibanez Steve Vai Woody guitar & Ibanez JEM70V Steve Vai Signature - Sea Foam Green and my Charvel model 5fx with EMG 81 in bridge and EMG SA in neck and my Gibson les paul special with Gibson p100 neck and Dimarzio p90 super distortion bridge and just cannot get a pleasing sound from it??

Tried again last night to play through the same setup again this time only with my Charvel and my Gibson Les Paul Special and there is just this honky, boxy flubby sound going on, sounds like there is no body to the sound and don't know what it is? My other amps in my signature, those amps did not take a lot of time dialing in to get a good sound, extremely frustrating!
The first few months I had mine I struggled to get it dialed too. There's a learning curve to it. I have included a pic below of my settings. The trick to dialing it in is to get the regular EQ set somewhere around where mine is, and adjust the sliders from there. Then you can go back and make adjustments to the regular eq if you need to. Adjusting the bass on the regular eq is where the thickness is going to come from, but you have to be careful not to over do it and introduce flub. You also need to be careful with the 240 and 750 sliders. Very subtle changes can make a huge difference. You can make it go from super scooped to boxy with a slight touch of either. For me, even with the settings dialed like this, the amp was a bit too harsh for me and I swapped the power tubes out for 5881's and put an AT7 in V6. This fixed any and all complaints I had about the amp. I hope this helps.
20221207_133627[1].jpg
 
I forgot to mention running the cab on Mono plugged into the 16 ohm input on Harley Benton 4x12 cab
 
Maybe check the bias resistor. I owned a Mark III that I used to absolutely love and over the course of time it just seemed to have lost all of its balls and thump. I noticed that the tubes were barely warm to the touch when playing. I dropped it off at a local repair shop who determined bias resistor was blown. When they told me that, I remembered one time rolling tubes through the amp when one of the EL34s in the simul-class section red plated on me. I turned the amp off as quickly as I could and everything ‘seemed’ OK. Because the amp fired up and played after replacing the crap tubes, I was unaware that I had done any damage at all. The amp worked fine with the blown bias resistor it was just biased so cold that it sounded like ass.
 
I forgot to mention running the cab on Mono plugged into the 16 ohm input on Harley Benton 4x12 cab
So you are running an impedance mismatch doing that. That will change the tone and give you a touch less power. Have you tried your 212 cab yet?
 
I have owned my Mark V since 2011 (purchased it brand new) glorius cleans on Channel 1 - great crushing tone either in IIC mode or Mark IV.
It is very sensitive to different speaker types and cabs, as well as having to dial it in is a science in itself. The bass and treble interact with how much gain the channel will produce. This amp does have a lot of mids which can be perceived as boxy depending on the settings. Again, it is something you have to dial in to your particular setup and liking. The only downside to the amp is that in my experience you have to find the channel master knob sweet spot in conjucntion with the overall output knob. The sweet spot of the output knob for me is always around 10 or 11 o' clock which is quite loud, but I feel is when the amp truly opens up. I have gigged with the amp many times, and in a band setting (hard rock/metal) it always cut through very nicely.
All that being said my disclaimer will be, this amp is not for everyone. It does have it's shortcomings. It is a very unforgiving amp and requires a lot of patience and tweaking to chase and achieve your tone.
 
What is completely different? The V compared to the IV, the V:25 or the EVH?

As I said, if those settings are not your thing, you'll probably won't like the amp anyway.
By the way, I'm currently A/B/C/D-ing 4 different 2x12 cabs at home and some of the differences are huge. Pairing the right cab with an amp makes all the difference. Some cabs & speakers do vintage, syrupy 'woody' tones better, but those may just as well sound lacklustre for tight high gain crushing stuff. And vice versa, the speakers that excel for high gain tight, modern stuff, may lack a lot of character for other applications.
Just my 2ct.
This is true. That's why I like my Boogie standard OS 4x12 with high gain. Doesn't have a ton of character, but it excels at high gain riffage. It's just really balanced and clear sounding with tons of gain, no really pokey frequencies that can get annoying.

For everything else I prefer my Avatar Vintage 4x12, which is like a bogner clone. It sounds really good for stuff that is more rock oriented, or for cleans and crunch. Great midrange character to it.

Like Luca79 said, the cab is like 70% of your tone.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top