JD Vance and trans-pauly “c” are Weird

paulyc said:
View attachment 330963
Click to expand...

spew laugh lindsey lohan.gif
 
OK, @paulyc and @Adnil that's enough of that thanks.

You both know we discourage these sexually-insulting tit-for-tats. It's covered in 2 stickies and is a part of the rules.

From the sticky in this (General) section:

The guidelines in the OTC Rebooted - RULES WITHIN sticky have been amended with the following:
"As of 2023-07-12 members will be punished for ad-hominem attacks of a sexual or overly-abusive nature."

UPDATE 2023-07-21
The pedo ad hominems have ceased. Well done and thank you guys!

Now, how about the rest of the sexual slurs? If you want to return to a schoolyard I suggest re-enrolling in primary school; this place ain't it.

The FoS here still allows you to talk about anything you want but just not to drag other members (and this place) into the gutter with puerile, childish tit-for-tat one-upmanship of a sexual nature. That is the domain of 12 year-olds. Nobody's changed his or her mind on any issue as a result of all that energy investment thus far, so if you somehow feel that your creative urges will be curtailed by this directive... there's that.
 
Monkey Man said:
OK, @paulyc and @Adnil that's enough of that thanks.

You both know we discourage these sexually-insulting tit-for-tats. It's covered in 2 stickies and is a part of the rules.

From the sticky in this (General) section:

The guidelines in the OTC Rebooted - RULES WITHIN sticky have been amended with the following:
"As of 2023-07-12 members will be punished for ad-hominem attacks of a sexual or overly-abusive nature."

UPDATE 2023-07-21
The pedo ad hominems have ceased. Well done and thank you guys!

Now, how about the rest of the sexual slurs? If you want to return to a schoolyard I suggest re-enrolling in primary school; this place ain't it.

The FoS here still allows you to talk about anything you want but just not to drag other members (and this place) into the gutter with puerile, childish tit-for-tat one-upmanship of a sexual nature. That is the domain of 12 year-olds. Nobody's changed his or her mind on any issue as a result of all that energy investment thus far, so if you somehow feel that your creative urges will be curtailed by this directive... there's that.
Click to expand...
Understood, I didn't read those guidelines. He (pauly "c") started with the fabricated couch intercourse, that's all I was pertaining to. He (pauly "c") then took it further with children. He seems to be very nasty, just like my ex.
 
Adnil said:
Understood, I didn't read those guidelines. He (pauly "c") started with the fabricated couch intercourse, that's all I was pertaining to. He (pauly "c") then took it further with children. He seems to be very nasty, just like my ex.
Click to expand...
He or she certainly crosses that line doesn't he. He or she is a weird person like most wacky libs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top