I was joking about the the confusing thing, just making fun of Gibson with their lawsuits. But yes, PRS guitars are inconsistent in tone. Some sound great some are just dead. But i played a SC245 that to me, sounded as good as any Les Paul i have heard or played. And i remember me and Ivan were in GC one day playing the PRS Custom 24's and there was one that was CLEARLY better sounding in terms of output, bottom end, and just plain balls.
But what does "sound good" actually mean? What if your idea of sounding good is out of phase or coil tapped tones. How do LP's sound for that style? What if i wanted a clear lead tone for fusion without an overabundance of midrange or bottom end. Would i want a LP for that?
I have heard one too many world class players get incredible tones from PRS guitars that i chuckle when people trash them. But with PRS, Gibson, and any other company, you have to play before you pay. Wood doesn't always sound like how it's supposed to.