Picasso
Well-known member
He's a black conservative.
No Clarence Thomas thread?
- Thread starter Bagel and Creamcheese
- Start date
Remember when you said you'd be in shit at your job if you took lavish gifts from customers? That 'law'.
Floyd Eye
Well-known member
The correct answer is none. He broke no laws.
Floyd Eye
Well-known member
I guarantee you Kagan, Breyer and RBG are/were all guilty of the exact same thing. The difference is CT pissed off the very vocal minority, woke cancel idiots with the abortion thing and the Bruen decision so the left is trying to take him down. The need for expediency is because thanks to the bad orange man the liberals will be in the minority on SCOTUS for years and years to come.An unwritten self ethics rule.
That's the point. Zero accountability.
If this was Kagen and a long time billionaire donor to liberal causes you'd be screaming bloody murder - and you know it.
You got any links to the bombshell reporting of any examples?
You're playing a variation of the 'whataboutism' game.
The only justice in the news right now is Thomas - and he has himself and his wife to blame.
No conspiracies.
Floyd Eye
Well-known member
For starters, being "Reported" is absolutely no barometer of what the truth is. Hence the Russian collusion hoax, the Hunter Biden laptop story, Hillary and the classified emails, etc.. What gets reported in this country is only what fits the narrative of the left and the democrats. Shootings only make the news if it's a white cop killing a black man or if it can somehow be spun by the media lapdogs to be evidence of the need for yet more gun laws. Maybe 2.5m times a year in this country an armed civilian stops a crime. That never gets reported. In fact the CDC colluded with the current white house to specifically NOT report that.
Second, I am willing to bet you were calling for Trump's head over the classified document scandal and I'm also willing to bet Grampy Joe having a shit ton of them in the garage by his Camaro, you considered a "Nothingburger".
And for your information, about 2 years ago I (correctly) predicted at least one, or a spate if necessary, conservative SCOTUS justice scandal. You guys are easy, predictable and boring.
You reffering directly to me, me as part of some group, or some group in general?
Floyd Eye
Well-known member
Lefties in general. I don't know you well enough to make a comment like that about you personally.
Learn the phrase "willful retention". That will clear up some of your confusion.
You don't need to break a law to get fired from ANYWHERE.
EDIT: Walk around work tomorrow calling people fags and dykes and cunts and n......s. See what happens. Go tell your boss one of the bidders on a contract you are awarding gave you a new Corvette. Hey, it's a legal gift, right?
Don't be intentionally obtuse. Thomas needs to resign. Plain and simple.
Floyd Eye
Well-known member
Except the supreme court. I'm not confused, but I think you might be.
Refer Madness.By the way, only one F in referring.
By the way, only one F in referring.
Let's stick to chatting about things that you can kill other people with.
We have shitloads more in common in that area.
Bro, get some help.Let's stick to chatting bout things that you can kill other people with.
We have shitloads more in common in that area.
Picasso
Well-known member
pazuzu-bootsy-baphomet-jr
Well-known member
Fact is, Thomas never should have been confirmed in the first place.
During the time of his confirmation hearing, most people with their brains wired in correctly, found it appalling that someone with credible unresolved allegations of sexual harassment would gain a Supreme Court seat.
The confirmation hearing itself was a God-damned shameful circus that did irreparable damage to the institution
Judges whose ethics, competence, and / or probity are reasonably in question, should plain and simply not be seated on the SCOTUS
Thomas has benefited from lack of precedent in removal of SCOTUS justices.
I speculate that no SCOTUS justice shall ever be removed, for the duration of the institution as it stands; there is simply too much inertia and a well-founded fear of establishing a culture of constant challenges to justices
What really should happen, in my opinion, is a revision of the confirmation process so that judges of poor character or low competence are not seated in the first place
During the time of his confirmation hearing, most people with their brains wired in correctly, found it appalling that someone with credible unresolved allegations of sexual harassment would gain a Supreme Court seat.
The confirmation hearing itself was a God-damned shameful circus that did irreparable damage to the institution
Judges whose ethics, competence, and / or probity are reasonably in question, should plain and simply not be seated on the SCOTUS
Thomas has benefited from lack of precedent in removal of SCOTUS justices.
I speculate that no SCOTUS justice shall ever be removed, for the duration of the institution as it stands; there is simply too much inertia and a well-founded fear of establishing a culture of constant challenges to justices
What really should happen, in my opinion, is a revision of the confirmation process so that judges of poor character or low competence are not seated in the first place
pazuzu-bootsy-baphomet-jr
Well-known member
Did you actually watch the Thomas hearings? Serious question.
Floyd Eye
Well-known member
While I do like things that you can kill other people with and I have no problem chatting about them, I also am perfectly capable of civily conversing with people who have opposing opinions or ideologies.Let's stick to chatting about things that you can kill other people with.
We have shitloads more in common in that area.