No talk about Corona Virus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter maddnotez
  • Start date Start date
Krull - I can't believe I'm gonna post this but, MY BAD... :jerkit: :gay: J/K It was my attempt at my prior statement about junk-ology. Just throw a open can of marinara sauce at a canvas and throw down darts.

Really.

Just another thought that crossed my non-medical at all mind, but. Something that I hope ain't too deestarted. In the event that a person dies and is infected with the COVID-19 virus it would not be listed as the reason. The doctor would most likely list the cause of death as acute pulmonary arrest, not COVID-19.

Dang dude...rollin'

 
Krull":3h5r8jcj said:
So you mean something like this?

“MN Senator and Dr. Reveals HHS Document Coached Him on How to Overcount COVID-19 Cases -- WITH COPY OF DOCUMENT”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...overcount-covid-19-cases-copy-document-video/
Can you not read for yourself?


Already responded :

They omitted the other important info.

Sick family member with COVID

An 86-year-old female passed away at home. Her husband reported that she was nonambulatory after suffering an ischemic stroke 3 years ago. He stated that 5 days prior, she developed a high fever and severe cough after being exposed to an ill family member who subsequently was diagnosed with COVID–19.


Out of context and this has already been explain



Sigh...... again cherry picked and not even the language in their guidance. Read all of the way through it. Even better, read and use critical thinking instead of just spreading misinformation

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/vsrg/vsrg03-508.pdf

The closest thing to the twisted misquote, but even so still out of context since there is plenty of example scenarios and guidance. All underlying conditions are required on the form.

An accurate count of the number of deaths due to COVID–19 infection, which depends in part on proper death certification, is critical to ongoing public health surveillance and response. When a death is due to COVID–19, it is likely the UCOD and thus, it should be reported on the lowest line used in Part I of the death certificate. Ideally, testing for COVID–19 should be conducted, but it is acceptable to report COVID–19 on a death certificate without this confirmation if the circumstances are compelling within a reasonable degree of certainty.

Furthermore, there are 2 sections. While listing COVID 19 and ARDS as the immediate cause of death, you are still listing the Underlying factors in section 2.
 
This shit never gets old. No different than calling everyone a RACIST! 24-HsaD or Xenophobe 24-HsaD or Homophobe 24-HsaD why not just use my new free App 24-HaaS (Hilarity as a Service) what do you got to lose?

Pound on it until you can no longer see straight and yur pupils are not waning or waxing but are between the sun and the moon at full bloom with some smelly teen spirit in the name of Mr. Cobain. Right? :scared: Hell yah...

I was going to post a YT vid of the song "Freak Out" but I don't want anybody to "Freak Out".

https://www.foxnews.com/science/video-r ... upermarket
 
524955_v9_bc.jpg
 
Krull":2ugt3558 said:
MN Senator and Doctor: Hospitals Get Paid More to List Patients as COVID-19 and Three Times as Much if the Patient Goes on Ventilator

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...ree-times-much-patient-goes-ventilator-video/

Maybe you can’t hear good? Must be that treble from the CCV.

Here’s the difference between you and me. I’m actually reading the document in entirety thats being referenced and taking it all into consideration and come up with my own critical thinking. You continue cherry pick bits that lack major contextual clarification. All you do is keep copying and pasting Someone else’s else biased interpretation of a document Rather than just reading it and it’s entirety. Its actually pretty clear and it’s guidelines. Also what is the benefit of wasting tests and resources on someone who’s already passed while we’re still amid the peak of the crisis. They’re not telling people just to put covered for everything. They are giving examples in which a person has a known CLOSE contact/exposure with someone who is tested positive as well as displaying the common symptoms of Covid AND has passed prior to a positive confirmation. They’re directing them To put it in one of the two sections That lists underlying conditions as well as presumptive underlying conditions. They’re not telling anybody to omit any underlying conditions regarding to the cause of death on the report.

Now based on that, if one is to interpret that they are being coached to inflate the numbers of COVID, They should really ask for a refund from whichever institution of higher learning they attended.
 
CNutz":26wtxfo6 said:
Picasso":26wtxfo6 said:

Yeah, Madcow is trash, just like Laura inbred.
CNutz, don't you think that's a bit harsh at this moment and time? I mean I'm not into to Butch types but who could tell. I was kinda into Shannon Bream until she appeared to have shown up on the block array unshaven and clearly just popped out of the crib moments before waxing her immoveable mug from the televised display screen. One thing's for sure. The chick is fairly comfortable and a little bit cocky too now that she's got a few months under her Calvin Klein designer's Diamond belt. Word in the studio is she does a good Konk. You Go Girls!
 
https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaki ... th-totals/

Dr. Bukacek is a longtime Montana physician with over 30 years’ experience practicing medicine. Signing death certificates is a routine part of her job. Dr. Bukacek blows the whistle on the way the CDC is instructing physicians to exaggerate COVID 19 on death certificates.



Few people know how much individual power and leeway is given to the physician, coroner, or medical examiner, signing the death certificate. How do I know this? I’ve been filling out death certificates for over 30 years.



More often than we want to admit, we don’t know with certainty the cause of death when we fill out death certificates. That is just life. We are doctors, not God. Autopsies are rarely performed and even when an autopsy is done the actual cause of death is not always clear. Physicians make their best guesstimate and fill out the form. Then that listed cause of death … is entered into a vital records data bank to use for statistical analysis, which then gives out inaccurate numbers, as you can imagine. Those inaccurate numbers then become accepted as factual information even though much of it is false.



This has been the way it has been done for some time, Bukacek says.



So even before we heard of COVID-19, death certificates were based on assumptions and educated guesses that go unquestioned. When it comes to COVID-19 there is the additional data skewer, that is –get this— there is no universal definition of COVID-19 death. The Centers for Disease Control, updated from yesterday, April 4th, still states that mortality, quote unquote, data includes both confirmed and presumptive positive cases of COVID-19. That’s from their website.



Translation? The CDC counts both true COVID-19 cases and speculative guesses of COVID-19 the same. They call it death by COVID-19. They automatically overestimate the real death numbers, by their own admission.



Bukacek refers to a March 24 CDC memo from Steven Schwartz, director of the Division of Vital Statistics for the National Center for Health Statistics, titled “COVID-19 Alert No. 2.”



“The assumption of COVID-19 death,” she says, “can be made even without testing. Based on assumption alone the death can be reported to the public as another COVID-19 casualty.”
 
The NY Times has thousands of employees globally, been around 150+ years, and is a news content generator.

You guys crack me up when you site stories from websites created a few years ago, like the Gatewaypundit. Three people that run a website out of a basement apartment that ineptly bastardize third party content. :lol: :LOL:
 
Back
Top